Abstract
Assisted reproduction using in vitro fertilization (IVF) is an established therapy when sperm and egg cannot meet inside the body and was originally developed as treatment for infertility but advances in the spectrum of therapeutic alternatives have broadened indications to include also patients with genetic problems and lately, fertility preservation. Uterus transplantation is today the only available treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility enabling them to reach a pregnancy and live birth, where assisted reproduction constitutes an integral part of the treatment. In this chapter, pretreatment assessments and considerations prior to inclusion and some clinical aspects of IVF treatments from the initial Swedish study are covered. In view of the rapid spread of this combined assisted reproduction technique and transplantation procedure, our focus is toward the assessment of the effectiveness of these interventions in recognition of the possibility that they may become future routine clinical practice, in addition to some aspects of potential for further developments time ahead.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amato P. Ovarian reserve testing. In: Falcone T, Hurd W, editors. Clinical reproductive medicine and surgery. Cham: Springer; 2017.
Beall SA, DeCherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801.
Ben-Rafael Z, Bar-Hava I, Levy T, Orvieto R. Simplifying ovulation induction for surrogacy in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1470–1.
Bento F, Esteves SC, Agarwal A, editors. Quality management in ART clinics: a practical guide. New York: Springer; 2013. isbn:978-1-4419-7139-5.
Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2014;385:607–16.
Brännström M, Bokström H, Dahm-Kähler P, Diaz-Garcia C, Ekberg J, et al. One uterus bridging three generations: first live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:261–6.
Cerne A, Bergh C, Borg K, Ek I, Gejervall AL, et al. Pre-ovarian block versus paracervical block for oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2916–21.
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, GarcĂa-Velasco JA. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:281–9.
De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, Santos-Ribeiro S, Camus M, Van de Velde H, et al. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2442–9.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Ciappina N, Fontana E, Borruto F. Laparoscopic findings and pelvic anatomy in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1111–5.
Friedler S, Grin L, Liberti G, Saar-Ryss B, Rabinson Y, et al. The reproductive potential of patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome using gestational surrogacy: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32:54–61.
Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AEP, Kollen BJ, et al. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:458–70.
Karlström PO, Holte J, Hadziosmanovic N, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Olofsson JI. Does ovarian stimulation regimen affect IVF outcome? a two-centre, real-world retrospective study using predominantly cleavage-stage, single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36:59–66.
Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15:6.
Matsota P, Kaminioti E, Kostopanagiotou G. Anesthesia related toxic effects on in vitro fertilization outcome: burden of proof. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:475362.
Olofsson JI, Banker MR, Sjoblom LP. Quality management systems for your in vitro fertilization clinic’s laboratory: why bother? J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6:3–8.
Oppelt P, Renner SP, Kellermann A, Brucker S, Hauser GA, et al. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:792–7.
Pribenszky C, Nilselid AM, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:511–20.
Raziel A, Vaknin Z, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Herman A, et al. Ultrasonographic-guided percutaneous transabdominal puncture for oocyte retrieval in a rare patient with Rokitansky syndrome in an in vitro fertilization surrogacy program. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1760–3.
Raziel A, Friedler S, Gidoni Y, Ben Ami I, Strassburger D, Ron-El R. Surrogate in vitro fertilization outcome in typical and atypical forms of Mayer–Rokitansky Küster–Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:126–30.
Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, Taylor B, Tallon N, et al. The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(4):683–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2.
Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjö T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.
Tobias T, Sharara FI, Franasiak JM, Heiser PW, Pinckney-Clark E. Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice. Fertil Res Pract. 2016;2:1.
Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363.
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). 2006. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Van Wely M, Kwan I, Burt AL, Thomas J, Vail A, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG. Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):CD005354. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005354.pub2.
WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Cambridge: WHO Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Wikland M, Nilsson L, Hansson R, Hamberger L, Janson PO. Collection of human oocytes by the use of sonography. Fertil Steril. 1983;39:603–8.
Wikland M, Enk L, Hammarberg K, Nilsson L. Use of a vaginal transducer for oocyte retrieval in an IVF/ET program. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15:245–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nilsson, L.B., Olofsson, J.I. (2020). Assisted Reproduction Before and After Uterus Transplantation. In: Brännström, M. (eds) Uterus Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94162-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94162-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94161-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94162-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)