Skip to main content

Geomorphic, Geo-tectonic, and Hydrologic Attributes and Landslide Probability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Prediction

Abstract

Landslides are caused due to the prevalence of geomorphic, tectonic, and hydrologic parameters which changes slope materials state and force them to move down slope. Darjeeling Himalaya exhibits a wide range of all these parameters and as a result of which slope failure has become a quite common phenomena in every monsoon which inflicts a great damage to human lives and properties. To mitigate the landslides and its destructive nature, the relationship between landslides location and various landslides occurrence factors are to be analysed scientifically. In the present work, various data layers such as elevation, slope aspect, slope angle, slope curvature, geology, soil, lineament density, distance to lineament, drainage density, distance to drainage, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetted index (TWI), rainfall, normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI) and land use and land cover (LULC) were prepared in ARC GIS environment. To assess the probability of each class of the landslide causative factors, frequency ratio (FR) value was estimated considering both landslide affected pixels and landslide non-affected pixels. The derived frequency ratio established the relationship between the probability of landslide and each class of the landslide causative factor. The study revealed that steep slope zones; south, south-east, and south-west facing slope; high positive and high negative curvature areas; areas of weak lithology; places close to drainage; locations close to lineaments; high stream power index and high topographic wetness index areas; and land use character of wasteland dry/barren land, wastelands with scrub, forest, agricultural single crop and agricultural plantation are registered with high frequency ratio and high landslide probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharyya, S. K. (2007). Evolution of the Himalayan Paleogene foreland basin, influence of its litho-packet on the formation of thrust-related domes and windows in the Eastern Himalayas—A review. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 31, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K. J., & Kirkby, M. J. (1979). A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24(1), 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, K., & Mitra, G. (2009). A new kinematic evolutionary model for the growth of a duplex—An example from the Rangit duplex, Sikkim Himalaya, India. Gondwana Research, 16, 697–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani, F., Casagli, N., Evmini, L., Righini, G., & Menduni, G. (2005). Landslide hazard mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides, 2, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, R. J. (1972). Lias Clay: Weathering processes and their effect on shear strength. Geotechnique, 15, 403–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, A., Lanteri, L., Ramasco, M., & Troisi, C. (2005). Systematic GIS based landslide inventory as the first step for effective landslide hazard management. Landslide, 2, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0025-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. J. (1989). Landslides: Causes, consequences and environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. J. (1999). Prediction of rainfall triggered landslides: A test of the antecedent water status model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24, 825–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, D. (1991). A simple definition of a landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 43, 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, M., Burger, G., Buma, J., & Gasparetto, P. (2000). Impact of climate change on slope stability using expanded downscaling. Engineering Geology, 55, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, W. E., Reiss, R., Hsu, M. & Montgomery, D. R. (1995). A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes 9, 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, W. E., Bellugi, D. & Real de Asua, R. (2001). Validation of the shallow landslide model SHALSTAB for forest management. In M. S. Wigmosta & S. J. Burges (Eds.), Land Use and Watersheds: Human influence on hydrology and geomorphology in urban and forest areas. American Geophysical Union Water Science and Application 2, 195–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermini, L., Catani, F., & Casagli, N. (2005). Artificial neural network applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology, 66, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonstad, M. A. (2003). Spatial variation in the Power of Mountain stream in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, New Mexico. Geomorphology, 55(1–4), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, M., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (2008). Comparing landslide inventory map. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 94, 268–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glade, T. (1998). Establishing the frequency and magnitude of landslide-triggering rainstorm events in New Zealand. Environmental Geology, 35, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Cardinali, M., Galli, M., & Ardizzone, F. (2005). Landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 72, 272–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javed, A., Ahmad, R., & Khanday, M. Y. (2009). Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Jounal of Idian, 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, G. (1997). Geology of Arunachal Pradesh. Bangalore: Geological Society of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Fort, P. (1975). Himalayas the collided range; present knowledge of the continental arc. American Journal of Science, 275A, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. & Sambath, T. (2006). Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environmental Geology, 50, 847–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Pradhan, B. (2007). Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides, 4(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, S., & Maiti, R. (2013). Integrating the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the frequency ratio (FR) model in landslide susceptibility mapping of Shivkhola Watershed, Darjeeling Himalaya. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4(4), 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matin, A., & Mazumder, S. (2009). Deformation mechanisms in the frontal Lesser Himalayan Duplex in Sikkim Himalaya, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 118, 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R., & Dietrich, W. E. (1994). A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow land sliding. Water Resources Research, 30(4), 1153–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., & Ladson, A. R. (1991). Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrological Processes, 5, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukul, M. (2010). First-order kinematics of wedge-scale active Himalayan deformation: Insights from DarjilingeSikkimeTibet (DaSiT) wedge. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 39, 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo, P., Di Lisio, A., Russo, F., & Zelano, A. (2008). Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics: a case study in southern Italy. Natural Hazards, 47(3), 411–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi, H. R., Pradhan, B., & Gokceoglu, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards, 63, 965–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, N. J. (2000). Feedback effects of rainfall triggered shallow landsliding. In E. Bromhead, N. Dixon, & M. L. Ibsen (Eds.), Landslide in research, theory and practice (pp. 1239–1244). Cardiff: Thomas Telford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. K. (1976). Some problems of stratigraphy and tectonics of the Darjeeling and Sikkim Himalayas. Geological Survey of India, Miscellaneous Publication, 24, 379–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozos, D., Bathrellos, G. D., & Skilodimou, H. D. (2011). Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system (RES) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods, based on landslide susceptibility maps, compiled in GIS environment: A case study from the Eastern Achai County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environment and Earth Science, 63(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybar, J. (1997). Increasing impact of anthropogenic activities upon natural slope stability. In P. G. Marinos, G. C. Koukis, G. C. Tsiambaos, & G. C. Stournaras (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Geology and Environment, 23-27 June 1997, Athens, Greece (pp. 1015–1020). Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. M., Roering, J. J., Stock, J. D., Dietrich, W. E., Montgomery, D. R., & Schaub, T. (2001). The variability of root cohesion as an influence on shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38, 995–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber, L., & Gornitz, V. (1983). River profiles along Himalayan arc as indicators of active tectonics. Tectonophysics, 92, 335–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shroder, J. F., & Bishop, M. P. (1998). Mass movement in the Himalaya: New insights and research directionns. Geomorphology, 26, 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Y., Bhat, G. M., Sharma, V., Pandita, S. K., & Thakur, K. K. (2012). Reservoir induced landslide at Assar, Jammu and Kashmir: A case study. Journal of the Geological Society of India 80(3), 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha-Roy, S. (1973). Tectonic evolution of the Darjeeling Himalayas. Quarterly Journal Geological, Mining and Metallurgical Society (India), 48, 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, A. (2006). Earth-Science Reviews, 76, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, A., Dubey, C. S., Webb, A. A. G., Kelty, T. K., Grove, M., Gehrels, G. E., et al. (2010). Geologic correlation of the Himalayan orogen: part 1. Structural geology, U-Pb zircon geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the Shillong Plateau and its neighbouring regions in NE India. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 122, 336–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mandal, S., Mondal, S. (2019). Geomorphic, Geo-tectonic, and Hydrologic Attributes and Landslide Probability. In: Statistical Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Prediction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93897-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics