Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“What if Nature Were Trying to Get Back at Us?”: Animals as Agents of Nature’s Revenge in Horror Cinema

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
American Revenge Narratives

Abstract

This chapter surveys and maps the late twentieth-century American sub-genre of “nature takes revenge” films. It shows how this strand of animal horror cinema follows complex narrative templates with different ecological messages. Through comparative analysis, it tracks five types of tales: (1) Humans venture into “nature,” where they encounter wild animals. (2) Animals are reduced to projection screens for the human. (3) Explicitly environmentalist horror films that employ animals as nature’s tools to restore order and the “natural” balance on the planet, relieving humanity of ecological accountability. (4) Films about mutations and hybridizations caused by human actions that highlight the entanglement of nature and culture. (5) Animal apocalypse films that envision an imminent post-human age suffering from the vestiges of anthropogenic actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Agney, Jeremy. 2015. The Creation of the Cowboy Hero: Fiction, Film and Fact. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, Stacy. 2001. “Discomforting Creatures: Monstrous Natures in Recent Films.” In Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism, edited by Karla Armbruster and Kathleen R. Wallace, 279–96. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Richard. 1997. “Avian Metaphor in The Birds.” Hitchcock Annual 6: 40–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby, Braden R., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2011. The Techno-Human Condition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Animal Studies Group. 2006. “Introduction.” In Killing Animals, edited by The Animal Studies Group, 1–9. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Phillip. 2005. “What Animals Mean, in Moby-Dick, for Example.” Textual Practice 19 (1): 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Steve. 2000. The Postmodern Animal. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, Nandita, and Vartan P. Messier. 2008. “The Multitudinous Seas: Matter and Metaphor.” In This Watery World: Humans and the Sea, edited by Vartan P. Messier and Nandita Batra, 1–19. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, John. 1971. “Animal World.” New Society 18: 1042–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. “Why Look at Animals?” In Why Look at Animals?, 12–31. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Birds (1963; Universal City, CA: Universal Pictures, 2013), Blu-ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousé, Derek. 2000. Wildlife Films. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, William. 1981. Of Plymouth Plantation, 1620–1647. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budianksy, Stephen. 1995. Nature’s Keepers: The New Science of Nature Management. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, Lawrence. 1995. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Neil, and Alasdair Kean. 1997. American Cultural Studies: An Introduction to American Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Rachel L. 2002. Silent Spring: 40th Anniversary Edition. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day of the Animals (1977; Habichtswald: DigiDreams Studios, 2016), Blu-ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Crèvecœur, Hector St. John. 1997. Letters from an American Farmer. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Wheeler Winston. 2010. A History of Horror. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, Lindiwe. 2009. African Film and Literature: Adapting Violence to the Screen. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2005. Society and Solitude. New York: Cosimo Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enge, Kevin M. et al. 2004. “Status of the Nile Monitor (Varanus niloticus) in Southwestern Florida.” Southeastern Naturalist 3 (4): 571–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, Cynthia. 2000. The Naked and the Undead: Evil and the Appeal of Horror. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frogs (1972; Rugby: 88 Films, 2016), Blu-Ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambin, Lee. 2012. Massacred by Mother Nature: Exploring the Natural Horror Film. Baltimore, MD: Midnight Marquee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, Al. 2013. Earth in the Balance: Forging a New Common Purpose. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersdotter, Katarina, Niklas Hållén, and Johan Höglund. 2015. “Introduction.” In Animal Horror Cinema: Genre, History and Criticism, edited by Katarina Gregersdotter, Johan Höglund, and Niklas Hållén, 1–18. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzly (1976; Habichtswald: DigiDreams Studios, 2016), Blu-ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzly Park (2008; Cologne: Splendid Film, 2008), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, Elizabeth. 1996. “Intolerable Ambiguity: Freaks as/at the Limit.” In Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body, edited by Rosemarie Garland Thompson, 55–65. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, Jhan. 1998. Green Cultural Studies: Nature in Film, Novel, and Theory. Moscow: University of Idaho Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, Margaret. 1986. “The Birds: A Mother’s Love.” A Hitchcock Reader, edited by Marshall Deutelbaum and Leland Poague, 279–87. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I. Q. 2016. Cult Film as a Guide to Life: Fandom, Adaptation, and Identity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, Peter. 2013. The Horror Film. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, David. 2000. Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivakhiv, Adrian J. 2013. Ecologies of the Moving Image: Cinema, Affect, and Nature. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaws (1975; Universal City, CA: Universal Pictures, 2012), Blu-ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdom of the Spiders (1977; Glendale, AZ: Code Red, 2017), Blu-ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, James. 2001. “The Postmodernist’s Journey into Nature: From Philo of Alexandria to Pocahontas and Back Again, By Way of Jean-François Lyotard.” In From Virgin Land to Disney World: Nature and Its Discontents in the USA of Yesterday and Today, edited by Bernd Herzogenrath, 33–52. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2014. “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene.” New Literary History 45 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippit, Akira Mizuta. 2000. Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisboa, Maria Manuel. 2011. The End of the World: Apocalypse and Its Aftermath in Western Culture. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Yuri Mikhailovich [as Lotman, Juri]. 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Translated by Ann Shukman. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. The Structure of the Artistic Text. Translated by Gail Lenhoff and Ronald Vroon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, Cotton. 2005. On Witchcraft. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, Herman. 1977. Moby-Dick. Norwalk, CT: Easton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn. 2002. The Columbia Guide to American Environmental History. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogen, David, Scott Patrick Sanders, and Joanne B. Karpinski. 1993. “Introduction.” In Frontier Gothic: Terror and Wonder at the Frontier in American Literature, edited by David Mogen, Scott Patrick Sanders, and Joanne B. Karpinski, 13–27. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Kim. 2011. Nightmare Movies: Horror on Screen Since the 1960s. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillip, Kendall R. 2005. Projected Fears: Horror Films and American Culture. Greenwood, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. 2013. “Three Worlds: Dwelling and Worldhood on Screen.” In Screening Nature: Cinema beyond the Human, edited by Guinevere Narraway and Anat Pick, 21–36. London: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, Val.. 2000. “Being Prey.” In The Ultimate Journey: Inspiring Stories of Living & Dying, edited by James O’Reilly, Sean O’Reilly, and Richard Sterling, 128–46. New York: Travelers’ Tales.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——–. 2012. “Meeting the Predator.” In The Eye of the Crocodile, edited by Lorraine Shannon, 9–21. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prey (2007; Potsdam: Galileo Medien AG, 2007), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prophecy (1979; Los Angeles, CA: Paramount Pictures, 2002), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rise of the Animals (2011; Munich: Alive, 2015), Blu-ray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Andrew. 1994. The Chicago Gangster Theory of Life: Nature’s Debt to Society. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, Jennifer. 2015. “Polluting and Perverting Nature: The Vengeful Animals of Frogs.” In Animal Horror Cinema: Genre, History and Criticism, edited by Katarina Gregersdotter, Johan Höglund, and Niklas Hållén, 58–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, Michel. 1995. The Natural Contract. Translated by Elizabeth Macarthur and William Paulson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, Steven. 1993. The Cinematic Body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skal, David J. 2001. The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror. New York: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoreau, Henry David. 1991. “Walking.” In Nature—Walking, edited by John Elder, 69–122. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trump, Donald J. (@realDonaldTrump). 2012. “The Concept Of Global Warming.” Twitter. 6 November; 8.15 pm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, Andrew. 1989. Monsters and Mad Scientists: A Cultural History of the Horror Movie. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2014. “Leonardo DiCaprio (UN Messenger of Peace) at the Opening of Climate Summit 2014.” Video. 23 September. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTyLSr_VCcg.

  • Whitehead, Dan. 2012. Tooth and Claw: A Field Guide to “Nature Run Amok” Horror Movies. Cheadle: The Zebra Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williston, Byron. 2015. The Anthropocene Project: Virtue in the Age of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Robin. 2002. Hitchcock’s Films Revisited. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan … and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worland, Rick. 2007. The Horror Film: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1992. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of American Studies, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

    Michael Fuchs

Authors
  1. Michael Fuchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of General Studies, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Kyle Wiggins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, M. (2018). “What if Nature Were Trying to Get Back at Us?”: Animals as Agents of Nature’s Revenge in Horror Cinema. In: Wiggins, K. (eds) American Revenge Narratives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93746-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation