Skip to main content
  • 1673 Accesses

Abstract

Patients with especially cervical lateral soft disc herniation profit a lot from a posterior microdiscectomy. When patient selection is good, the results are comparable to ACDF as well as the reoperation rate at the index level. Other advantages are missing of adverse events of the ventral access and an absent necessity for a device. But adjacent segment operation rate seems also to be comparable to ACDF so that the motion-preserving effect of posterior microdiscectomy might not prevent adjacent segment degeneration.

There are two ways for operation especially concerning the approach: classic midline or transmuscular. The transmuscular approach has less morbidity but is more difficult to learn.

In the literature, there are not many RCTs concerning posterior microdiscectomy so the level of evidence is not high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Iyer S, Kim HJ. Cervical radiculopathy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9(3):272–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Skovrlj B, Gologorsky Y, Haque R, Fessler RG, Qureshi SA. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Spine J. 2014;14(10):2405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang TY, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy. Spine J. 2015;15(5):971–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu WJ, Hu L, Chou PH, Wang JW, Kan WS. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Orthop Surg. 2016;8(4):425–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutman G, Rosenzweig DH, Golan JD. The surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(6):E365–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bastian Storzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Storzer, B., Koller, H. (2019). Posterior Microdiscectomy. In: Koller, H., Robinson, Y. (eds) Cervical Spine Surgery: Standard and Advanced Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93432-7_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93432-7_62

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93431-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93432-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics