Abstract
Posterior cervical foraminotomy was first described in the mid-twentieth century as a treatment for symptomatic neural foraminal stenosis. This technique is best used in cases of posterior or lateral compression of the nerve root. Because of its high rate of success in alleviating symptoms and relatively low risk of complications, it is employed frequently. Approximately 50 years after the introduction of the open approach, minimally invasive adaptations of the technique were developed. The open and minimally invasive approaches allow comparable decompression of the nerve root and similar rates of successful symptom improvement. The minimally invasive approach is associated with decreased blood loss, decreased hospital stay, and reduced postoperative muscle spasm and pain. This chapter reviews the indications, surgical planning considerations, optimal positioning, relevant anatomy, and surgical technique for the open and minimally invasive approaches to the posterior cervical foraminotomy. We also address the potential pitfalls of this technique and identify prophylactic measures to prevent them from occurring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Dodwad S-JM, Dodwad S-NM, Prasarn ML, et al. Posterior cervical foraminotomy: indications, technique, and outcomes. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29:177–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000384.
Hiremath GK, Perez-Cruet MJ. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. In: Schmidek and sweet operative neurosurgical techniques. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012. p. 1771–6.
Rhee JM, Yoon T, Riew KD. Cervical radiculopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:486–94. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200708000-00005.
Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa K. The spurling test and cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2002;27:156–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200201150-00007.
Fast A, Parikh S, Marin EL. The shoulder abduction relief sign in cervical radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:402–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00460797.pdf.
Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1178–84.
Dyck P. Cervical foraminotomy: indications and technique. In: Watkins III RG, Watkins IV RG, editors. Surgical approaches to the spine. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2015. p. 277–82.
Angevine PD, McCormick PC. Posterior approach to cervical degenerative disease. In: Youmans neurological surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. p. 2868–75.
Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE, et al. Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine. 2009;34:955–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2fd5.
Roh SW, Kim DH, Cardoso AC, Fessler RG. Endoscopic foraminotomy using a microendoscopic discectomy system in cadaveric specimens. Neurosurg Focus. 1998;4:E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.1998.4.2.5.
Clark J, Abdullah K, Steinmetz M, et al. Minimally invasive versus open cervical foraminotomy: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2011;1:009–14. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1296050.
Williams RW. Microcervical foraminotomy: an alternative posterior technique for intractable radicular pain. In: Watkins III RG, Watkins IV RG, editors. Surgical approaches to the spine. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2015. p. 283–8.
Raynor RB. Anterior or posterior approach to the cervical spine: an anatomical and radiographic evaluation and comparison. Neurosurgery. 1983;12:7–13.
Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, et al. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years’ clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:347–56. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.12.SPINE08576.
Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, et al. Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:727–31. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.SPINE131110.
Clarke MJ, Ecker RD, Krauss WE, et al. Same-segment and adjacent-segment disease following posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:5–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.2.
Çağlar Y, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, et al. Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970138.
Zeidman SM, Ducker TB. Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for radiculopathy: review of 172 cases. Neurosurgery. 1993;33:356–62.
Skovrlj B, Gologorsky Y, Haque R, et al. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Spine J. 2014;14:2405–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.048.
Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey HMJ, Shackelford GE. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
MROZ posterior cervical_foramenotomy (MPG 16491 kb)
Supplementary Data 61.2
Sciubba_Final (PPTX 46551 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boone, C., Mroz, T., Goodwin, C.R., Witham, T., Sciubba, D. (2019). Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy. In: Koller, H., Robinson, Y. (eds) Cervical Spine Surgery: Standard and Advanced Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93432-7_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93432-7_61
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93431-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93432-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)