Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Balancing Prevention and Protection: Child Protection in England

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
National Systems of Child Protection

Part of the book series: Child Maltreatment ((MALT,volume 8))

Abstract

This chapter presents an analysis of the child protection system in England today. It begins with a discussion of how the policies and priorities which have shaped the system have developed over time and traces the ways in which policy has sought to resolve the continuing tension at the heart of state intervention in family life, that is, the need to balance the needs and rights of children and the rights of parents. The chapter outlines the legal and institutional frameworks that underpin child protection activity today and examines the key policy principles that govern practice, including partnership with parents, the need to ensure stability and permanence for children removed from their parents and the associated need to avoid delay in decision-making. It then charts the current operation of the system through an analysis of patterns of intervention, including assessment, voluntary intervention, child protection plans and compulsory intervention in the form of court-ordered placement in out of home care. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the challenges that children, families and the English child welfare system currently face as a result of the government austerity programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Action for Children, National Children’s Bureau, & The Children’s Society. (2016). Losing in the long run. Trends in early intervention funding. London: Action for Children, National Children’s Bureau & The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J., & Tunstill, J. (1995). Making sense of section 17. Implementing services for children in need within the Children Act 1989. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • All Party Parliamentary Group For Children. (2017). No good options. Report of the inquiry into children’s social care in England. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. (2011a). Early intervention: Smart investment, massive savings. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. (2011b). Early intervention: The next steps. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission. (1994). Seen but not heard – Co-ordinating community child health and social services for children in need within the Children Act 1989. London: The Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. (1998). Regulating child care: From the Children Act 1948 to the present day. Child & Family Social Work, 3, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., & De Haan, M. (2011). Parenting and children’s brain development: The end of the beginning. Journal of Child Psychology And Psychiatry, 52, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, D., Biehal, N., & Henry, L. (2012). Living in children’s residential homes. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehal, N. (2005). Working with adolescents at risk of out of home care: The effectiveness of specialist teams. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 1045–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehal, N. (2014). Maltreatment in foster care: A review of the evidence. Child Abuse Review, 23, 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Garnham, A., Lister, R., & Shaw, M. (2016). Improving children’s life chances. London: Child Poverty Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, C., & Brocklehurst, P. (2014). Safeguarding pressures Phase 4. Manchester: Association of Directors of Children’s Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, C., Brocklehurst, P., & Ellis, A. (2016). Safeguarding pressures Phase 5. Manchester: Association of Directors of Children’s Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Ward, H. (2012). Decision-making within a child’s timeframe. An overview of current research evidence for family justice professionals concerning child development and the impact of maltreatment. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C., Morris, K., Scourfield, J., Sparks, T., & Webb, C. (2018). Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: A universal challenge? Child & Family Social Work, 23(1), 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. J. (2015). Council spending on essential items for children in need rose 20% under coalition Community CareNovember 25th. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2015/11/25/council-spending-essential-items-children-need-rose-20-coalition/

  • Department for Education. (2010). Children looked after by local authorities including adoption: 2009–10. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2015). Children Act 1989: Care planning, placement and case review. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2016a). Characteristics of children in need: 2015 to 2016 Sfr 52/2016. London: National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2016b). Children looked after in England (including adoption) year ending 31 March 2016 Sfr 41/2016. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2017a). Children looked after in England including adoption: 2016 to 2017. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2017b). Planned expenditure on schools, education and children’s services by local authorities in England, 2017–18. Sfr 48/2017, 21 September 2017. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2002). The Children Act report 2002. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Every child matters: Change for children. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (1995). Child protection. Messages from the research. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D., & Shinn, E. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, H. (2011). Child protection practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. A., Marsh, P., & Phillips, D. (1986). In and out of care. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Harding, L. (1991). Perspectives in child care policy. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, N., & Parton, N. (2009). Understanding children’s social care. Politics, policy and practice. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godar, R. (2017). Child protection – A review of the literature on current systems andpractice. London: Research In Practice/Early Intervention Foundation/Local Government Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E., & Guy, J. (2009). The Baby Peter effect and the increase in section 31 Care Order applications. London: CAFCASS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwin, J., & Madge, N. (2010). The concept of significant harm in law and practice. Journal of Children’s Services, 5(2), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (1978). Children in care. The development of the service for the deprived child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2015). Working together to safeguard children. A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, B. (1988). Putting families first. prevention and childcare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. (1998). Children Act 1948 and 1989: Similarities, differences, continuities. Child & Family Social Work, 3, 149–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, G., & Stepney, P. (1995). The Children Act 1989 – Protection or persecution? Family support and child protection in the 1990s. Critical Social Policy, 43, 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham (1997–2013). Rotherham: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2014). The story of Baby P. setting the record straight. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, C., Silverman, F., Steele, B., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. (1962). The battered child syndrome. Journal of The American Medical Association, 81, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord Laming. (2003). The Victoria Climbie inquiry: Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming (Cm 5730). London: Department for Education and Skills/The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Laming. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, S., Hart, R., Jeffes, J., & Wilkin, A. (2010). The impact of the Baby Peter case on applications for Care Orders. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, A., & Fein, E. (1983). Permanency planning: A redefinition. Child Welfare, 62, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, J., Dickens, J., Bader, K., Garside, L., & Young, J. (2017). How is the PLO working? What is its impact on court process and outcome? Family Law Week, 17th February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. (1980). Caring for separated children. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (2005). Safeguarding childhood. Early intervention and surveillance in late modern society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., & Spencer, S. (2015). Safeguarding children from destitution: Local authority responses to families with ‘No recourse to public funds’ COMPAS. Oxford: University Of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffett, N. (2016). DfE: ‘No Link’ between spending on children’s social care and quality, Children and Young People Now, January 12th. https://www.cypnow.co.uk/cyp/news/1155494/dfe-no-link-between-spending-on-childrens-social-care-and-quality

  • Radford, L., Corral, S., Bradley, C., & Fisher, H. L. (2013). The prevalence and impact of child maltreatment and other types of victimization in the UK: Findings from a population survey of caregivers, children and young people and young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., & Lambert, L. (1973). Children who wait. London: Association of British Adoption and Fostering Agencies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J., & Statham, J. (2009). Numbers of children looked after in England: A historical analysis. Child & Family Social Work, 14, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for Social Services. (1974). Report of the inquiry into the care and supervision provided in relation to Maria Colwell. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, R., Kendrick, A., Milligan, I., & Hawthorn, M. (2008). Lessons learnt? Abuse in residential child care in Scotland. Child & Family Social Work, 13, 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (2017). Four in ten children’s services unable to meet legal duties due to funding pressures, finds survey. Community Care, October 31st.  http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2017/10/31/four-ten-childrens-services-unable-meet-legal-duties-due-funding-pressures-finds-survey/

  • Thoburn, J. (2010). Achieving safety, stability and belonging for children in out-of-home care. The search for ‘What Works’ across national boundaries. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 12, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell Trust. (2017). UK foodbank use continues to rise as new report highlights growing impact of universal credit rollout on foodbanks, 25th April. https://www.trusselltrust.org/2017/04/25/uk-foodbank-use-continues-rise/

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, M. (2013). The practical implications of the emerging findings in the neurobiology of maltreatment for looked after and adopted children: Recognising the diversity of outcomes. Adoption And Fostering, 37, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of York, York, UK

    Nina Biehal

Authors
  1. Nina Biehal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Biehal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA

    Lisa Merkel-Holguin , John D. Fluke  & Richard D. Krugman ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biehal, N. (2019). Balancing Prevention and Protection: Child Protection in England. In: Merkel-Holguin, L., Fluke, J.D., Krugman, R.D. (eds) National Systems of Child Protection. Child Maltreatment, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93348-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93348-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93347-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93348-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation