Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Neuropalliative Care pp 205–218Cite as

Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Population-based studies have demonstrated that a significant and increasing proportion of deaths is preceded by a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, defined as a treatment without which life would, with a very high probability, end within a foreseeable period. This chapter discusses ethical considerations around withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments with a focus on neurologic disease. I discuss epidemiology, definitions and terminology, the ethical criteria for guiding decision-making and present a goals of care-based algorithm that may help make clinical decisions near the end of life. This algorithms suggests that treatment should not be administered unless it is both medically appropriate (indicated) and supported by the patient’s autonomous will. If patients or proxies demand a treatment considered medically inappropriate, the ethically correct response depends on the analysis of the underlying reasons of conflict. The chapter ends with some practical suggestions concerning advance care planning, palliative care consultation and clinical ethics consultation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, Nilstun T, Norup M, Paci E, et al. End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet. 2003;362(9381):345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seale C. End-of-life decisions in the UK involving medical practitioners. Palliat Med. 2009;23(3):198–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pennec S, Monnier A, Pontone S, Aubry R. End-of-life medical decisions in France: a death certificate follow-up survey 5 years after the 2005 act of parliament on patients’ rights and end of life. BMC Palliat Care. 2012;11:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schildmann J, Dahmen B, Vollmann J. End-of-life practices of physicians in Germany. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015;140(1):e1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmid M, Zellweger U, Bosshard G, Bopp M. Medical end-of-life decisions in Switzerland 2001 and 2013: who is involved and how does the decision-making capacity of the patient impact? Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA. 2003;290(6):790–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent JL, Berre J, Creteur J. Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment in the intensive care unit: a current European perspective. Chron Respir Dis. 2004;1(2):115–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mark NM, Rayner SG, Lee NJ, Curtis JR. Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1572–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Quill CM, Ratcliffe SJ, Harhay MO, Halpern SD. Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs. Chest. 2014;146(3):573–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seale C. The role of doctors’ religious faith and ethnicity in taking ethically controversial decisions during end-of-life care. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(11):677–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinzbrunner BM. Jewish medical ethics and end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2004;7(4):558–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zientek DM. Artificial nutrition and hydration in Catholic healthcare: balancing tradition, recent teaching, and law. HEC Forum. 2013;25(2):145–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bulow HH, Sprung CL, Reinhart K, Prayag S, Du B, Armaganidis A, et al. The world’s major religions’ points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(3):423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sprung CL, Maia P, Bulow HH, Ricou B, Armaganidis A, Baras M, et al. The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(10):1732–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jox RJ, Krebs M, Fegg M, Reiter-Theil S, Frey L, Eisenmenger W, et al. Limiting life-sustaining treatment in German intensive care units: a multiprofessional survey. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):413–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood GG, Martin E. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42(3):186–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Asch DA, Christakis NA. Why do physicians prefer to withdraw some forms of life support over others? Intrinsic attributes of life-sustaining treatments are associated with physicians’ preferences. Med Care. 1996;34(2):103–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Asch DA, Faber-Langendoen K, Shea JA, Christakis NA. The sequence of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from patients. Am J Med. 1999;107(2):153–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. WHO definition of palliative care 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/.

  20. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):733–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haun MW, Estel S, Rucker G, Friederich HC, Villalobos M, Thomas M, et al. Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(6):Cd011129.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cochrane TI. Withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatment. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;118:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death, Fact sheet updated January 2017. Geneva: WHO; 2017. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alonso A, Ebert AD, Dorr D, Buchheidt D, Hennerici MG, Szabo K. End-of-life decisions in acute stroke patients: an observational cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15:38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holloway RG, Benesch CG, Burgin WS, Zentner JB. Prognosis and decision making in severe stroke. JAMA. 2005;294(6):725–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Steen JT, Radbruch L, Hertogh CM, de Boer ME, Hughes JC, Larkin P, et al. White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliat Med. 2014;28(3):197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veldink JH, Wokke JH, van der Wal G, Vianney de Jong JM, van den Berg LH. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Netherlands. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(21):1638–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tuck KK, Zive DM, Schmidt TA, Carter J, Nutt J, Fromme EK. Life-sustaining treatment orders, location of death and co-morbid conditions in decedents with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(10):1205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seeber AA, Hijdra A, Vermeulen M, Willems DL. Discussions about treatment restrictions in chronic neurologic diseases: a structured review. Neurology. 2012;78(8):590–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jox RJ, Kuehlmeyer K, Klein AM, Herzog J, Schaupp M, Nowak DA, et al. Diagnosis and decision making for patients with disorders of consciousness: a survey among family members. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(2):323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Creutzfeldt CJ, Holloway RG. Treatment decisions after severe stroke: uncertainty and biases. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3405–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rachels J. Active and passive euthanasia. N Engl J Med. 1975;292(2):78–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Munshi L, Dhanani S, Shemie SD, Hornby L, Gore G, Shahin J. Predicting time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):1014–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubenfeld GD. Principles and practice of withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Clin. 2004;20(3):435–51. ix

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Campbell CS, Cox JC. Hospice-assisted death? A study of Oregon hospices on death with dignity. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012;29(3):227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van Beinum A, Hornby L, Ward R, Ramsay T, Dhanani S. Variations in the operational process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(10):e450–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sprung CL, Paruk F, Kissoon N, Hartog CS, Lipman J, Du B, et al. The Durban World Congress Ethics Round Table Conference Report: I. Differences between withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. J Crit Care. 2014;29(6):890–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barilan YM. Rethinking the withholding/withdrawing distinction: the cultural construction of “life-support” and the framing of end-of-life decisions. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2015;10(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Marckmann G, editor. Praxisbuch Ethik der Medizin. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft. isbn:978-3-95466-117-6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, Sheikh A. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ. 2005;330(7498):1007–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jox RJ. Sterben lassen. Über Entscheidungen am Ende des Lebens. Hamburg: Rowohlt; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jox RJ, Schaider A, Marckmann G, Borasio GD. Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(9):540–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Burns JP, Truog RD. Futility: a concept in evolution. Chest. 2007;132(6):1987–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pellegrino ED. Futility in medical decisions: the word and the concept. HEC Forum. 2005;17(4):308–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schneiderman LJ. Defining medical futility and improving medical care. J Bioeth Inq. 2011;8(2):123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Blair RJR, Colledge E, Murray L, Mitchell DG. A selective impairment in the processing of sad and fearful expressions in children with psychopathic tendencies. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2001;29(6):491–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bruno MA, Bernheim JL, Ledoux D, Pellas F, Demertzi A, Laureys S. A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1):e000039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lule D, Zickler C, Hacker S, Bruno MA, Demertzi A, Pellas F, et al. Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:339–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rousseau MC, Baumstarck K, Billette de Villemeur T, Auquier P. Evaluation of quality of life in individuals with severe chronic motor disability: a major challenge. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016;5(2):83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rousseau MC, Pietra S, Nadji M, Billette de Villemeur T. Evaluation of quality of life in complete locked-in syndrome patients. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(11):1455–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Appelbaum PS. Clinical practice. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1834–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hast Cent Rep. 2004;34(2):30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jox RJ. Preparing existential decisions in later life. Advance healthcare planning. In: Schweda M, Pfaller L, Brauer K, Adloff F, Schicktanz S, editors. Planning later life bioethics and public health in ageing societies. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2017. p. 164–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Houben CH, Spruit MA, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Janssen DJ. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(7):477–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Robinson L, Dickinson C, Rousseau N, Beyer F, Clark A, Hughes J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of advance care planning interventions for people with cognitive impairment and dementia. Age Ageing. 2012;41(2):263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2014;28(8):1000–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Austin CA, Mohottige D, Sudore RL, Smith AK, Hanson LC. Tools to promote shared decision making in serious illness: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1213–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Martin RS, Hayes B, Gregorevic K, Lim WK. The effects of advance care planning interventions on nursing home residents: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(4):284–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Oliver DJ, Borasio GD, Caraceni A, de Visser M, Grisold W, Lorenzl S, et al. A consensus review on the development of palliative care for patients with chronic and progressive neurological disease. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(1):30–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kwak J, Wallendal MS, Fritsch T, Leo G, Hyde T. Advance care planning and proxy decision making for patients with advanced Parkinson disease. South Med J. 2014;107(3):178–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Fritz L, Dirven L, Reijneveld JC, Koekkoek JA, Stiggelbout AM, Pasman HR, et al. Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients. Cancers. 2016;8(11).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Levi BH, Simmons Z, Hanna C, Brothers A, Lehman E, Farace E, et al. Advance care planning for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tran LN, Back AL, Creutzfeldt CJ. Palliative care consultations in the Neuro-ICU: a Qualitative Study. Neurocrit Care. 2016;25(2):266–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Creutzfeldt CJ, Engelberg RA, Healey L, Cheever CS, Becker KJ, Holloway RG, et al. Palliative care needs in the Neuro-ICU. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1677–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman RA. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth. 2007;7(2):13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Core competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation Glenview, IL, USA. 2010. Available from: http://www.asbh.org/publications/content/core.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany

    Ralf J. Jox MD, PhD

  2. Geriatric Palliative Care, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Ralf J. Jox MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Ralf J. Jox MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf J. Jox MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Claire J. Creutzfeldt

  2. Professor of Neurology, Chief Neurology Supportive and Palliative Care Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

    Benzi M. Kluger

  3. Professor and Edward A. and Alma Vollertsen Rykenboer Chair, Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA

    Robert G. Holloway

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jox, R.J. (2019). Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment. In: Creutzfeldt, C., Kluger, B., Holloway, R. (eds) Neuropalliative Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93215-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93215-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93214-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93215-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation