Skip to main content

Economic Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1100 Accesses

Abstract

In a sustainable waste collection and management system, the economic component is traditionally an imperative factor for the decisions and justifications of all operations. The calculation of the cost and revenue components associated with waste collection systems must be taken into account and analyzed from an integrated waste management perspective. Additionally, the willingness and the affordability of citizens to finance the waste collection and management system are also vital to the success of any collection and management system. In this chapter presented and discussed are the waste collection costs, the financial concerns of waste management systems and instruments of waste policy, and the public and private sector financing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelli I, Abdelmalek F, Djelloul A, Mesghouni K, Addou A (2016) GIS-based approach for optimised collection of household waste in Mostaganem city (Western Algeria). Waste Manag Res 34:417–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adamsen C, Blagoeva T, Ilisescu AR, Le Den X, Nielsen SS (2016) Legal assistance on the application of public procurement rules in the waste sector – final report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch A, Brunner PH (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 32:461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arribas C, Blazquez C, Lamas A (2010) Urban solid waste collection system using mathematical modelling and tools of geographic information systems. Waste Manag Res 28:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assis R (2011) Depreciation methods (in Portuguese: Métodos de amortização). http://www.rassis.com/artigos/Economia/Metodos%20de%20Amortizacao.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2015

  • Bel G, Miralles A (2003) Factors influencing the privatisation of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Stud 40:1323–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilitewski B, Härdtle G, Maek K, Weissbach A, Boeddicker H (1994) Waste management. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilitewski B, Werner P, Reichenbach J (2004) Handbook on the implementation of Pay-As-You-Throw as a tool for urban waste management. Eigenverlag des Forum für Abfallwirtschaft und Altlasten e. V., Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm R, Folz D, Kinnaman T, Podolsky M (2010) The costs of municipal curbside recycling and waste collection. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:864–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolaane B, Isaac E (2015) Privatization of solid waste collection services: lessons from Gaborone. Waste Manag 40:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch N, Pedraja F, Suárez-Pandiello J (2001) The efficiency of refuse collection services in Spanish municipalities: do non-controllable variables matter? Institut d'Economia de Barcelona, Centre de Recerca en Federalisme fiscal I Economia regional, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskovic G, Jovicic N, Jovanovic S, Simovic V (2016) Calculating the costs of waste collection: a methodological proposal. Waste Manag Res 34:775–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouhamed A, Chaabouni J (2008) Partenariat public-privé en Tunisie: Les conditions de succès et d’échec. Int J Technol Manag Sustain Dev 7:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan S, Thomas J (2001) Economies of scale and scope: a cost analysis of municipal solid waste services. Land Econ 77:548–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho JM (2011) Annex 5: municipal solid waste management costs (in Portuguese: Anexo 5: Custos de sistema de gestão de resíduos urbanos). www.ua.pt/ReadObject.aspx?obj=18467. Accessed 23 Sep 2015

  • Chang NB, Pires A (2015) Sustainable solid waste management: a systems engineering approach. IEEE Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury M (2009) Searching quality data for municipal solid waste planning. Waste Manag 29:2240–2247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (2004) Smart (Pay-as-You-Throw) implementation handbook. http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/reduce_reuse_recycle/payt/ct_dep_smart_implementation_handbook_parts_1_thru_4.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2018

  • D’Onza G, Greco G, Allegrini A (2016) Full cost accounting in the analysis of separated waste collection efficiency: a methodological proposal. J Environ Manag 167:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén L, Lagerkvist A (2010) Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden. Waste Manag 30:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén L, Åberg H, Lagerkvist A, Berg PE (2009) Inconsistent pathways of household waste. Waste Manag 29:1798–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delloite (2004) Model of calculation of counterpart amount (in Portuguese: Modelo de cálculo do valor de contrapartida - versão final). Instituto dos Resíduos, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf E, Gradus RHJM (2004) Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste: the case of The Netherlands. Resour Energy Econ 26:353–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan K, Süleyman S (2003) Report: cost and financing of municipal solid waste collection services in Istanbul. Waste Manag Res 21:480–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin J, Navarro P (1988) How markets for impure public goods organize the case of households refuse collection. J Law Econ Organ 4:217–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços de Águas e Resíduos (ERSAR) (2014) Tariff regulation for municipla solid .waste management service (in Portuguese: Regulamento tarifário do serviço de gestão de resíduos urbanos). http://www.ersar.pt/. Accessed 3 Jun 2015

  • European Commission (2015) Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects – economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio MP (2011) Waste collection multi objective model with real time traceability data. Waste Manag 31(12):2391–2405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folz DH (1999) Recycling policy and performance: trends in participation, diversion, and costs. Public Work Manag Policy 4:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberini R, Galloni L, Rimini B, Beltrami FO (2009) Evaluation and comparison of waste collection services. In: Abstracts of the twelfth international waste management and landfill symposium, Sardinia, 9–11 Oct 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamberini R, Del Buono D, Lolli F, Rimini B (2013) Municipal solid waste management: identification and analysis of engineering indexes representing demand and costs generated in virtuous Italian communities. Waste Manag 33:2532–2540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez MI (2008) The performance of Spanish solid waste collection. Waste Manag Res 26:327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose MD (2006) A GIS based transport model for solid waste disposal – a case study on Asansol municipality. Waste Manag 26:1278–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girth AM, Hefetz A, Johnston JM, Warner ME (2012) Outsourcing public service delivery: management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Admin Rev 72:887–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GIZ GmbH (2015) Economic instruments in solid waste management: applying economic instruments for sustainable solid waste management in low and middle-income countries. https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2015-en-waste-management-economic-instruments.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2018

  • Gomes AP (2008) Separate collection of the biodegradable fraction of MSW: an economic assessment. Waste Manag 28:1711–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Torre, P. L., Adenso-Díaza, B., Ruiz-Torres, R. (2003). Some comparative factors regarding recycling collection systems in regions of the USA and Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 69 (2), 129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulart A (2003) Comparison of deep collection system with traditional system. Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology (TUT)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaver F (1999) Strategic outsourcing – a structured approach of outsourcing decisions and iniatives. AMACOM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco G, Allegrini M, Del Lungo C, Savellini PG, Gabellini L (2015) Drivers of solid waste collection costs Empirical evidence from Italy. J Clean Prod 106:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage OS (2008) An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: the case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Manag 28:1720–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg D (2002) Costs for municipal waste management in the EU: final report to directorate general environment, European Commission. Eunomia Research & Consulting, Ltd, on behalf of Ecotec-Research & Consulting

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series knowledge papers, nr. 15. Urban Development & Local Government Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Pan T, Kao J (2011) Performance assessment for municipal solid waste collection in Taiwan. J Environ Manag 92:1277–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen R, Buysse J, Gellynck X (2013) Cost comparison between private and public collection of residual household waste: multiple case studies in the Flemish region of Belgium. Waste Manag 33:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson O (2006) The effect of dynamic scheduling and routing in a solid waste management system. Waste Manag 26:875–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse A, Kakabadse N (2005) Outsourcing: current and future trends. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 47:183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karadimas N, Papatzelou K, Loumos V (2007) Optimal solid waste collection routes identified by the ant colony system algorithm. Waste Manag Res 25:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinyua BK (2015) Determinants of outsourcing services as a cost reduction measure in devolve government: a case study of Narobi city country, Kenya. Eur J Bus Soc Sci 4:12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling M, Seyring N, Tzanova P (2016) Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: an approach based on the analytic hierarchy process. Waste Manag Res 34:912–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komilis DP (2008) Conceptual modeling to optimize the haul and transfer. Waste Manag 28:2355–2365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen A, Vrgoc M, Christensen T, Lieberknecht P (2009) Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance. Waste Manag Res 27:652–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen A, Merrild H, Moller J, Christensen T (2010) Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark). Waste Manag 30:744–754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavita, M (2008) Multi-material door-to-door collection routes (in Portuguese: Circuitos de recolha selectiva multi-material porta-a-porta). Dissertation, IST/UTL – Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J (2004) National paradigm and 3R policy (reverse logistics) (in Portuguese: Panorama 999 nacional e a polÚtica dos 3R (logÚstica inversa)). In: Abstracts from the Recursos, resÚduos e 1000 reciclagem, IST, Lisbon, 25 Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J, Oliveira R, Brito J (2007) Reverse logistics (in Portuguese: A logística inversa). http://seminarios.ist.utl.pt/03-04/des/IST-seminario/sprod/3sessao. Accessed Dec 26 2013

  • López JV, Soriano F, Aguilar M, León B, Ramos-Catalina P, Carretero C (2007) MetodologÚa de Contenerización para residuos de envases ligeros: caso de Aranjuez. E.T.S.I. de Montes. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Dpto. IngenierÚa Forestal. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Massouda M, El-Fadelb M, Malak AA (2003) Assessment of public vs private MSW management: a case study. J Environ Manag 69:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod F, Cherrett T (2011) Waste collection. In: Letcher TM, Vallero DA (eds) Waste: a handbook for management. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 61–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller L, Delbridge P (1995) Waste management in Hampshire feedback on the strategy, December 1995. Miller Associates and PDA International

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TTT, Wilson GB (2010) Fuel consumption estimation for kerbside municipal solid waste (MSW) collection activities. Waste Manag Res 28:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary P, Walsh P (1995) Decision maker’s guide to solid waste management, 2nd edn. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, RCRA Information Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson H (2003) Ownership and production costs: choosing between public production and contracting-out in the case of Swedish refuse collection. Fisc Stud 24:451–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018) Extended producer responsibility. http://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/extendedproducerresponsibilityhtm. Accessed 4 May 2018

  • Padovani E, Young DW (2008) Toward a framework for managing high-risk government outsourcing: field research in three Italian municipalities. J Public Procure 8:215–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D, Brisson I (1995) The economics of waste management. In: Hester RE, Harrison RM (eds) Waste treatment and disposal. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Perman R, Common M, McGilvray J, Ma Y (2003) Natural resource and environmental economics, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J (2004) Evolving partnerships in the collection of urban solid waste in the developing world. In: Isa B, Post J, Furedy C (eds) Solid waste management and recycling: actors, partnerships and policies in Hyderabad, India. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 21–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rada E, Ragazzi M, Fedrizzi P (2013) Web-GIS oriented systems viability for municipal solid waste selective collection optimization in developed and transient economies. Waste Manag 33:785–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje WL, Murphy C (1992) Rubbish! The archaeology of garbage. Harper Collins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach J (2008) Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe – a review of pilot research and implementation studies. Waste Manag 28:2809–2814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoma FZ (2010) Environmental & economical optimization for municipal solid waste collection problems, a modeling and algorithmic approach case study. In: WSEAS international conference on mathematical methods, computational techniques and intelligent systems, Sousse, Tunisia, May 3–6, 2010, pp 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci M (2003) Economic assessment of separate collection cost: tools to optimize it and the advantage of operative integration. In: Abstracts from the future of source separation of organic waste in Europe. Barcelona, Spain, 15–16 Dec 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzoli A, Montemanni R, Lucibello E, Gambardella L (2007) Ant colony optimization for realworld vehicle routing problems – from theory to applications. Swarm Intell 1:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues S (2016) Classification and benchmarking of urban waste collection systems (in portuguese: Classificação e benchmarking de sistemas de recolha de resíduos urbanos). Dissertation, NOVA University of Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues S, Martinho G, Pires A (2016a) Waste collection systems part A: a taxonomy. J Clean Prod 113:374–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues S, Martinho G, Pires A (2016b) Waste collection systems part B: benchmarking. J Clean Prod 139:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge N, De Jaeger S (2012) Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing. Waste Manag 32:1968–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjeevi V, Shahabudeen P (2016) Optimal routing for efficient municipal solid waste transportation by using ArcGIS application in Chennai, India. Waste Manag Res 34:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos RF, Santana F, Antunes P, Martinho MG, Jordão L, Sirgado P, Neves AG (1994) Municipal solid waste management system of Lisbon – Cost analysis (in Portuguese: Sistema de resíduos sólidos do município de Lisboa – Análise da estrutura de custos do sistema de resíduos sólidos). Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, NOVA University of Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekdar A, Mistry P (2001) Evaluation of multifarious solid waste management systems – a goal programming approach. Waste Manag Res 19:391–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson U (2000) Modelling of waste collection – a general approach to calculate fuel consumption and time. Waste Manag Res 18:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sora M, González J (2014) Economic balance of door-to-door and road containers waste collection for local authorities and proposals for its optimization. Commissioned by the Association of Catalan Municipalities for Door-to-Door Selective collection to Fundació ENT

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens B (1978) Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection services: the case of Ireland. Econ Soc Rev 31:129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • SusValueWaste (2017) Private or .public waste management? http://www.susvaluewaste.no/2017/10/12/private-or-public-waste-management/. Accessed 4 May 2018

  • Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S (1993) Integrated solid waste management engineering: principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997) Full cost accounting for municipal solid waste management: a handbook. United States Environmental Protection, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk MP, Schouten M (2004) The dynamics of the European water supply and sanitation market. In: Abstracts from AWRA international specialty conference 2004, University of Dundee, 29 Aug – 2 Sept 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal RG (2001) Integrated analysis for pre-sorting and waste collection schemes implemented in Spanish cities. Waste Manag Res 19:380–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins E, Hogg D, Mitsios A, Mudgal S, Neubauer S, Reisinger H, Troeltzsch J, Van Acoleyen M (2012) Use of economic instruments and waste management performances – final report. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/final_report_10042012.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pires, A., Martinho, G., Rodrigues, S., Gomes, M.I. (2019). Economic Perspective. In: Sustainable Solid Waste Collection and Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93200-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics