Skip to main content

Engaging: The Choice and Use of Participatory Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Further Reading and Sources of Inspiration

  • Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2011). Arts based research. London/Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn-Giddings, C., & Cook, T. (2016) Editorial. Concluding thoughts: Virtual issue on the theme of “creative expression” in action research. Educational Action Research http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pdf/EARJ-VSI-Editorial.pdf

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Abma, T. A. (1998). Storytelling as inquiry in a mental hospital. Qualitative Health Research, 8(6), 821–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A. (2001). Opening thoughts. In T.A. Abma (Eds.), Dialogue in evaluation. Evaluation, 7(2): 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A. (2005). Responsive evaluation: Its meaning and special contribution to health promotion. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A. (2018) Dialogue and deliberation, new approaches to the inclusion of patients in research agenda setting, action research. Feb 26, 2018. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1476750318757850

  • Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2005). Sharing stories: Narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28(1), 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T.A., Leyerzapf, H., & Landeweer, E. (2016), Responsive evaluation in the Interferencezone between system and lifeworld. American Journal of Evaluation, 1–14, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016667211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. (2000). Theatre of the oppressed (3rd ed.). London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (1998). The importance of mess in action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (2009). The purpose of mess in action research: Building rigour through a messy turn. Educational Action Research, 17(2), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (2011). Towards Inclusive Living: A case study of the impact of inclusive practice in neurorehabilitation/neuro-psychiatry services. DoH Policy Programme Long Term Neurological Conditions http://www.ltnc.org.uk/research_files/impact_inclusive.html

  • Cook, T., & Hess, E. (2007). What the camera sees and from whose perspective? Fun: methodologies for engaging children in enlightening adults. Childhood, 14(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. (1997). Participatory action research in Colombia: Some personal feelings. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences (pp. 107–112). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. 1978 ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and justification. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013). Position Paper 1: What is Participatory Health Research? Editorial Group: Michael T. Wright, Germany (lead); Irma Brito, Portugal; Tina Cook, UK; D Janet Harris, UK; Maria Elisabeth Kleba, Brazil; Wendy Madsen, Australia; Jane Springett, Canada; Tom Wakeford, UK www.icphr.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2011). Focus groups. Contingent articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 545–561). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madriz, E. (2000). Focus groups in feminist research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 835–850). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, L. (2003). Rhetorical spaces: Participation and pragmatism in the evaluation of community health work. Evaluation, 9(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (2007). My story is my living educational theory. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 308–329). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, M., Wallerstein, N., Sussman, A., Avila, M., & Belone, L. Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power: The Impact of Positionality on Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Processes and Outcomes, Critical Sociology, published first online 30 May 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513516025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munn-Giddings, C., & Cook, T. (2016) Editorial. Concluding thoughts: Virtual issue on the theme of “creative expression” in action research. Educational Action Research http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pdf/EARJ-VSI-Editorial.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierse, C., Schipper, K., van Zadelhoff, E., van de Griendt, J., & Abma, T. A. (2012). Collaboration and co-ownership in research. Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations, 15(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x/abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pushor, D., & Clandinin, D. J. (2009). The interconnections between narrative inquiry and action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 290–300). London: Sage Publications Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, R. (2017). The mother of all questions. Chicago: HaymarketBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B. (2002). Inhabiting each other’s castles: Towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration. In C. Day, J. Elliott, B. Somekh, & R. Winter (Eds.), Theory and practice in action research: Some international perspectives (pp. 79–104). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumara, D. J., & Luce-Kapler, R. (1993). Action research as a writerly text: Locating co-labouring in collaboration. Education Action Research, 1(3), 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Auerbach, E. (2004). Problem-posing at work: Popular educators guide. Edmonton: Grass Roots Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2006). Using community based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7(3), 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abma, T. et al. (2019). Engaging: The Choice and Use of Participatory Methods. In: Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93191-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93191-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93190-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93191-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics