Skip to main content

Janus’s Interspecies Faces: Biomorphic Transformations in the Ecology of Mind in James Cameron’s Avatar

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Film in the Anthropocene

Abstract

James Cameron’s Avatar (Three-Disc Extended Collector’s ed. Los Angeles: Produced by Twentieth Century Fox, in Associating with Dune Entertainment, Ingenious Film Partners, and Lightstorm Entertainment, 2009.) represents both the optimistic dreams and the postcolonial nightmares rising with digital media in the new era. The film is a technical masterpiece and, on a superficial level, provides a vision of panhuman and interspecies liberation in the context of colonialism and imperialism, here expanded to interplanetary spaces. Yet, at the same time, as its critics point out, the film becomes itself a vehicle of colonialist expansion, importing Eurocentric subjectivity and entrepreneurial exploitation into its hero’s, Jake Sully’s, composite human-Na’vi persona. Thus, film audiences are transported by the film into a fantasy of being heroes of democratization and indigenous rights while, in fact, being implicit in cultural and economic imperialism. Which view is right? For a wider perspective on the film, I draw upon Jason Moore’s Capitalism in the Web of Life, to combine dialectics with cybernetics in a critical-theoretical viewing of Avatar. Mental ecology forms the “mind” inextricably linked with the “bodies” of human and the myriad other species who form the laboring multitude of Gaia rising toward universal emancipation. The critical model here might be invoked in the interpretation of Black Panther (2018), and other films epitomizing conflicts of the Anthropocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alētheia is the Greek word meaning “truth, truthfulness.” It is derived from alethes “true,” literally “not concealing,” from the privative prefix a- “not” + lethe “forgetfulness, oblivion, concealment”—Online Etymological Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com/word/alethea, accessed April 16, 2018.

  2. 2.

    The language was created by linguistics PhD Paul Frommer of USC. See “Learn Na’vi” (2018), https://learnnavi.org/, accessed March 16, 2018.

  3. 3.

    How one would come to understand colonialism and act responsibly on that understanding without becoming complicit in it, Thakur does not make clear. Is not standing by in inaction when one is confronted with exploitation also ethically unacceptable? Žižek (2010) argues that the Maoist Naxalite rebels in India in rebellion against the state to protect their indigenous lands are a case comparable to the Na’vi. But in what way is Maoism not a doubly foreign ideological intervention—Chinese and European Marxist—in the first place, not to mention their weapons, imported from colonialist powers to India, he does not explain. If the Naxalites were left with agrarian tools to resist the modern Indian or British army, would that be a preferable course of action? Would the “indigenous ideology” of caste be of any help? The quandary is typical, as I suggest, of the postcolonial condition as it is experienced by former colonizers and colonized alike. Recall John Marshall’s decision to intervene in Namibia and the critical response of his anthropological colleagues (see Chap. 6, in this volume). See Narayan (2015) for a study of Naxalism and Maoism in India.

  4. 4.

    I believe that Moore’s evaluation of cybernetics—“the unification [provided by the Anthropocene narrative] is not dialectical; it is the unity of the cyberneticist—a unity of fragments, an idealist unity that severs the constitutive historical relations that have brought the planet to its present age of extinction” (2017b, 2)—is overly pessimistic. See “Cybernetics and Dialectics” below.

  5. 5.

    Birds more easily identified and consumed the lighter moths in the darkened landscape, so that the proportion of darker ones in the population grew proportionately (see Cook and Saccheri 2012; Rudge 2005). Note that the population, rather than the phenotype, exhibits adaptive flexibility in Bateson’s terms.

  6. 6.

    See especially Beniger’s account of a DNA-prototype’s evolution four billion years ago in light of Maxwell’s demon and the processes of crystal formation (1986, 44–57, 68–71) as well as Chap. 2, in this volume. For more recent research along the lines suggested by Beniger see Cartwright and Mackay (2012); Fraccia et al. (2015); for a more accessible account, see University of Colorado at Boulder (2015).

  7. 7.

    A 16-mm copy of Hitlerjunge Quex in German, including Bateson’s partially complete commentary in intertextual slides, is available for rent from the Museum of Modern Art. A DVD copy of the original film with English subtitles is available from International Historic Films. See film title in the Works Cited below. For contemporary commentary, see Erich Rentschler (1996, 53).

  8. 8.

    See Booss-Bavnbec and Høyrup (2003) and especially Bernhardt and Ruhmann (2003).

  9. 9.

    See, for example, Wallace-Wells (2017), “annotated edition,” which incorporates criticisms by scientists that illustrate the current state of controversy over the state of global ecology as well as Marzek (2016), Dyer (2010), Oreskes and Conway (2014).

  10. 10.

    The passage is also cited by Althusser in his commentary (2015), and implicit in Žižek’s (1989, 10–14) critical appraisal of Sohn-Rethel’s (1978) and Althusser’s (above, Part 1, §13–14, 66–75) readings of the text as well as by Hartsock’s and Smith’s (1979–1980) critique of Althusser’s reading.

  11. 11.

    Kant argues, accordingly, “no cognition can occur in us … without the unity of consciousness that precedes all data” ([1887] 1998a, § A106–107, 232; 1998b, 214). See Chap. 8, in this volume.

  12. 12.

    For a good argument to the effect that David Hume was not the barefoot empiricist he is often made out to be, see Buckle (2004); he might well have been a rationalist.

  13. 13.

    See Wapshott (2011) for Hayek’s debate with John Maynard Keynes that defined the contours of modern capitalist economics.

  14. 14.

    See Wilkes (1997) for commentary on Aristotle’s conception of psuchē or “soul” and Descartes idea of “mind” or res cogitans; see Aristotle (2016) for a good current translation and commentary.

References

  • Adas, Michael. 1989. Machines as the Measure of Man: Science, Technology, and the Ideologies of Western Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adlakha, Siddhant. 2018. Thor: Ragnarok: Marvel from a Postcolonial Perspective. Village Voice, 10 November. Accessed March 16, 2018, https://www.villagevoice.com/2017/11/10/thor-ragnarok-marvel-from-a-postcolonial-perspective/.

  • Althusser, Louis. 2015. Reading Capital: The Complete Edition. Translated by Ben Brewster and David Fernbach. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1961. De Anima. Edited with introduction and commentary by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. De Anima. Translated with an introduction and commentary by Christopher Shields. Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Gregory. 2000a. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000b. Conscious Purpose versus Nature. In Steps, 432–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000c. A Theory of Play and Fantasy. In Steps, 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000d. The Logical Categories of Learning and Communication. In Steps, 279–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000e. The Role of Somatic Change in Evolution. In Steps, 346–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000f. An Analysis of Nazi Film: Hitler Jungequex. In The Study of Culture at a Distance, ed. Margaret Mead, 331–347. New York: Bergahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Nora, dir., and producer. 2010. An Ecology of Mind: A Daughter’s Portrait of Gregory Bateson. Impact Media. Accessed November 24, 2017. http://www.anecologyofmind.com/.

  • Baucom, Ian. 2015. ‘Moving Centers:’ Climate Change, Critical Method, and the Historical Novel. Modern Language Quarterly 76 (2): 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla. 2011. Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniger, James R. 1986. The Control Revolution: The Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. 1998. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, Bernhelm, and Ingo Ruhmann, eds. 2003. On Facts and Fiction in ‘Information Warfare’. In Mathematics and War. Edited by Booss-Bavnbeck and Jens Høyrup, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, William. 1988. Complete Poetry and Prose. Edited by David B. Erdman. Commentary by Harold Bloom. Newly Rev. ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booss-Bavnbec, Bernhelm, and Jens Høyrup, eds. 2003. Mathematics and War. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Stewart, ed. 1968–1972. The Whole Earth Catalog. Accessed November 24, 2017. http://www.wholeearth.com/history-whole-earth-catalog.php.

  • Bröckling, Ulrich. 2013. Das unternehmerische Selbst: Soziologie einer Subjektivierungsform. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufman. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckle, Stephen. 2004. Hume’s Enlightenment Tract: The Unity and Purpose of An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, James, dir. 2009. Avatar. Three-Disc Extended Collector’s ed. Los Angeles: Produced by Twentieth Century Fox, in Associating with Dune Entertainment, Ingenious Film Partners, and Lightstorm Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Julyan H.E., and Alan L. Mackay. 2007. Avatar. Twentieth Century Fox: Film script. Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Beyond Crystals: The Dialectic of Materials and Information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 370: 2807–2822. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 35 (2, Winter): 197–222. Accessed March 16, 2018. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/596640.

  • Coll, Steve. 2004. Ghost Wars. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Directorate S. New York: Penguin–Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogler, Ryan. 2018. Black Panther. Burbank: Marvel Studios.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L.M., and I.J. Saccheri. 2012. The Peppered Moth and Industrial Melanism: Evolution of a Natural Selection Case Study. Heredity 110 (3): 207–212. Accessed March 16, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costner, Kevin, dir. 1990. Dances with Wolves. Los Angeles. Orion Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargis, Manohla. 2018. Review: ‘Black Panther’ Shakes Up Marvel Universe. New York Times, February 6. Accessed March 16, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/06/movies/black-panther-review-movie.html.

  • Davis, Adam. 2013. Native Images: The Otherness and Affectivity of the Digital Body. Jump Cut 55 (Fall). Accessed November 26, 2017. http://ejumpcut.org/archive/jc55.2013/DavisCGI/index.html.

  • Duncan, Jody, and Lisa Fitzpatrick. 2010. The Making of Avatar. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Gwynn. 2010. Climate Wars: The Fight for Survival as the World Overheats. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Friedrich. 2001. The Dialectics of Nature. Marxists Internet Archive. Originally published in German and Russian, 1925. Accessed December 11, 2017. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/EngelsDialectics_of_Nature_part.pdf.

  • Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et Punir: Naissance de la Prison. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraccia, Tommaso P., Gregory P. Smith, Giuliano Zanchetta, Elvezia Paraboschi, Yougwooo Yi, David M. Walba, Giorgio Dieci, Noel A. Clark, and Tommaso Bellini. 2015. Abiotic Ligation of DNA Oligomers Templated by Their Liquid Crystal Ordering. Nature Communications 6 (6424). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7424.

  • Gabriel, Mike, and Eric Goldberg, dirs. 1995. Pocahontas. Burbank: Walt Disney Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, Henri A. 2014. Neoliberalism’s War on Higher Education. New York: Haymarket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, William A. 2006. Karl Popper and the Social Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabiner, Ellen. 2012. I See You: The Shifting Paradigms of James Cameron’s Avatar. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grbic, Jovana. 2009. Behind Avatar: Science, Technology, Art and Design. ScriptPhD, December 14. http://scriptphd.com/from-the-lab/2009/12/14/behind-avatar-science-technology-art-and-design/.

  • Hadot, Pierre. 1993. Plotinus or the Simplicity of Vision. Translated by Michael Chase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries-Jones, Peter. 2010. Bioentropy, Aesthetics and Meta-dualism: The Transdisciplinary Ecology of Gregory Bateson. Entropy 12: 2359–2385. Accessed February 29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12122359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, Nancy, and Neil Smith. 1979–1980. On Althusser’s Misreading of Marx’s 1857 ‘Introduction’. Science and Society 43 (4, Winter): 486–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heims, Stephen. 1980. John von Neumann and Norbert Wiener, from Mathematics to the Technologies of Life and Death. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The Cybernetics Group. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1647. Elementa Philosophica De Cive. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Donald. 1985. Theophrastus as Ecologist. Environmental Review 9 (4, Winter). Special Issue: Roots of Ecological Thought: 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 2017. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Jonathan Bennett. Early Modern Texts. Originally published in 1781. Accessed December 11, 2017. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/hume1748.pdf.

  • Hutton, Noah. 2010. The Neuroscience of Avatar. The Beautiful Brain. Accessed February 16, 2018. thebeautifulbrain.com/2010/01/the-neuroscience-of-avatar/.

  • Jay, Martin. 1993. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1998a. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Alan Wood. Originally published in German in 1887. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, Ian. 2007. Fateful Choices: Decisions that Changed the World 1940–1941. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, Friedrich. 2010. Optical Media. Translated by Anthony Ens. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Enlarged ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, Richard, and Richard Lewontin. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, David. 1980. Gregory Bateson: The Legacy of a Scientist. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logevall, Fredrik. 2012. Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America’s Vietnam. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, James. 2000. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1971. Introduction to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by S. W. Ryazanskaya. Originally written in 1857. London: Lawrence and Wishart. Marxists Internet Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzek, Robert P. 2016. The end(s) of Immanence in the Anthropocene: Militarized Ecologies and the Future of Deleuzian Thought. Journal for Cultural Research 20 (4): 380–397. Accessed December 11, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2016.1168974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maté, Aaron. 2010 ‘Avatar’ Director James Cameron Follows Box Office Success with Indigenous Struggles. Democracy Now. Produced by Amy Goodman. Accessed December 2, 2017. https://www.democracynow.org/2010/4/27/avatar_director_james_cameron_follows_box.

  • Maxwell, Clerk. 1871. The Theory of Heat. London: Longman’s, Green, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1992. The Idea of Teleology. Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (1): 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, Warren S. 1965. The Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Margaret, and Gregory Bateson. 1976. For God’s Sake Margaret! CoEvolution Quarterly 10 (June 21): 32–44. Accessed November 24, 2017. http://www.wholeearth.com/issue/2010/article/361/for.god’s.sake.margaret.

  • Meehan, Sean Ross. 2013. Ecology and Imagination: Emerson, Thoreau, and the Nature of Metonymy. Criticism 55 (2, Spring): 299–329. Accessed December 12, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2013.0014.

  • Michigan State University (MSU) Library. Companies Involved in Cloning Research. Accessed November 20, 2017. http://staff.lib.msu.edu/skendall/cloning/companies.htm.

  • Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of our Ecological Crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (3): 594–630. Accessed November 19, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.

  • ———. 2017b. The Capitalocene Part II: Accumulation by Appropriation and the Centrality of Unpaid Work/Energy, 1–43. Accessed November 19, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1272587.

  • Mulvey, Laura. 1975. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen 16 (3): 6–18. Accessed November 19, 2017. https://doi-org.ezproxy.fau.edu/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.

  • Mumford, Lewis. 1970. The Pentagon of Power. In Myth of the Machine, part 2. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, S. 2015. Naxalism and Maoism in India. New Delhi: Gyan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1987. Sämtliche Briefe. Kritische Studienausgabe. Edited by Giogio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, vol. 6. January 1880–December 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Gay Science. Translated by Josephine Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Schreibmaschinentexte. Complete Edition: Facsimiles and critical commentary. Weimar: Bauhaus-Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2007. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, and Species Membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online Archive of California (OAC). 2008. Online Archive of California: Inventory of the Gregory Bateson Papers. Accessed November 24, 2017. http://www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt029029gz/entire_text/.

  • Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2014. The Collapse of Western Civilization: A View from the Future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, Stephen. 1997. The Cybernetic Delirium of Norbert Wiener. Edited by Arthur Kroker and Marilouise Kroker. CTheory. Accessed March 16, 2018. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14641.

  • Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. In Originally published in German as Die Logic der Forschung 1934. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Open Society and Its Enemies. New One-Volume ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rentschler, Eric. 1996. Emotional Engineering: Hitler Youth Quex (1933). In The Ministry of Illusion: Nazi Cinema and Its Afterlife, 53–70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, David W. 2005. The Beauty of Kettlewell’s Classic Experimental Demonstration of Natural Selection. BioScience 55 (4): 369–375. Accessed March 16, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0369:TBOKCE]2.0.CO;2.

  • Rudolph, Conrad. 2011. Inventing the Exegetical Stained-Glass Window: Suger, Hugh, and a New Elite Art. The Art Bulletin 93 (4): 399–422. Accessed December 7, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2011.10786016.

  • Shearmur, Jeremy. 1986. Popper’s Critique of Marxism. Critical Review 1 (1): 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Bradley R. 2008. Economists with Guns: Authoritarian Development and U.S.–Indonesian Relations, 1960–1968. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn-Rethel, A. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan. 1977. On Photography. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1985. Can the Subaltern Speak?: Speculations on Widow Sacrifice. Wedge 7/8 (Winter/Spring): 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff, Hans, dir. 1933. Hitlerjunge Quex. Babelsberg: Ufa Studios. English Subtitled Version available from International Historic Films. Accessed November 24, 2017. https://ihffilm.com/22927.html.

  • Stevens, Justice et al. 2010. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (No. 08–205). Legal Information Institute. Cornell University of Law. Supreme Court of the United States, January 21. Accessed February 19, 2018. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-205.ZX.html.

  • Szilard, Leo. 1972. On the Decrease of Entropy in a Thermodynamic System by the Intervention of Intelligent Beings. In The Collected Works of Leo Szilard, Scientific Papers, ed. Bernard T. Feld and Gertrud Weiss Szilard, vol. 1, 120–133. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, Gautam Basu. 2015. Postcolonial Theory and Avatar (Film Theory in Practice). London: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, Alberto. 2008. The Open Secret of Real Abstraction. Rethinking Marxism 20 (2): 273–287. Accessed March 16, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690801917304.

  • Trinh T. Minh-ha, dir. 2001. The Fourth Dimension. Digital Color. 87 minutes. New York: Women Make Movies.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Colorado at Boulder. 2015. New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA. ScienceDaily, April 7. Accessed December 10, 2017. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150407095635.htm.

  • Varela, Francisco J., Eleanor Rosch, and Evan Thompson. 2016. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Wells, David. 2017. The Uninhabitable Earth, Annotated Edition. New York Magazine, July 14. Accessed November 30, 2017. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/climate-change-earth-too-hot-for-humans-annotated.html.

  • Wapshott, Nicholas. 2011. Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Daniel R. 1998. Postmodern Ecology: Communication, Evolution, and Play. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Nietzsche’s Demonology: Beyond Good and Evil in the Mode of Information. Resetting Theory. Ctheory RTO19, February 2009. Accessed December 4, 2017. http://ctheory.net/ctheory_wp/nietzsches-demonology/.

  • Wiener, Norbert. 1954. The Human Use of Human Beings. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961. Cybernetics, or, Control and Communication in the Organism and the Machine. Rev. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. God and Golem, Inc. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, Anthony. 1980. System and Structure: Essays in Communication and Exchange. 2nd ed. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, K.V. 1997. Psuchē versus The Mind. In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, ed. Martha C. Nussbaum, 109–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemeckis, Robert, Director. 1988. Who Framed Roger Rabbit? Touchstone Pictures: Burbank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Avatar: Return of the Natives. New Statesman, March 4. Accessed November 21, 2017. https://www.newstatesman.com/film/2010/03/avatar-reality-love-couple-sex.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

White, D. (2018). Janus’s Interspecies Faces: Biomorphic Transformations in the Ecology of Mind in James Cameron’s Avatar. In: Film in the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93015-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics