Skip to main content

Toward a Comparative Political Economy of Reactive States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economies of Turkey and Greece

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

Kutlay offers a comparative analysis of the Turkish and Greek cases with particular reference to three-stage framework. Chapter 7 lays out the main findings of the present book. Accordingly, in-depth analysis of four episodes in two reactive states puts the parts of the conceptual framework together. Main findings advance the debate on reform dynamics in reactive states, on the centrality of crisis narratives approach in explaining the divergence of post-crisis outcomes, and on the role of policy entrepreneurs in instigating paradigmatic changes in the aftermath of economic crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Atul Kohli et al., “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium,” World Politics 48, no. 1 (1995): 1–49.

  2. 2.

    This phrase belongs to John Gerard Ruggie, which is quoted in Jeffrey W. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik, “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24, no. 2 (1999): 50.

  3. 3.

    Shawn Donnelly, “Power Politics and the Undersupply of Financial Stability in Europe,” Review of International Political Economy 21, no. 4 (2014): 980–1005.

  4. 4.

    Jawaharlal Nehru, Jawaharlal Nehru’s Speeches 1949–1953 (New Delhi: The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1954), 144.

  5. 5.

    For interview data, see Chap. 4.

  6. 6.

    Interview with senior official of TÜRK-İŞ, September 10, 2014; interview with senior official of DİSK, September 9, 2014; interview with senior advisor to President, TÜSİAD, September 24, 2014; interview with senior advisor to Kemal DerviŞ September 26, 2014.

  7. 7.

    E. Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu, “Introduction: Citizenship, Identity, and the Question of Democracy in Turkey,” in E. Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu, Citizenship in a Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences (London: Routledge), 11.

  8. 8.

    Ünay, Neoliberal Globalization and Institutional Reform, 170.

  9. 9.

    Francesca Gambarotto and Stefano Solari, “The Peripheralization of Southern European Capitalism Within the EMU,” Review of International Political Economy 22 (4): 788–812. Also see Fouskas and Dimoulas, Greece, Financialization, and the EU.

  10. 10.

    Susan Watkins, “Another Turn of the Screw,” New Left Review, no. 75 (2012): 12.

  11. 11.

    Valentina Pop, “Merkel Under Fire for ‘Lazy Greeks’ Comment,” EUobserver, May 19, 2011.

  12. 12.

    Quoted in Nick Malkoutzis, “Is Greece a Failed State?” Foreign Policy, March 1, 2012.

  13. 13.

    Peter A. Hall, “The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis,” German Politics 21, no. 4 (2012): 365.

  14. 14.

    For the analysis of the interview data, see Chap. 6.

  15. 15.

    For the full list of my interviews with the representatives of Greek political parties, trade unions, business associations, and third-party observers see appendix. Also see, Liz Alderman and Jack Ewing, “Most Aid to Athens Circles Back to Europe,” New York Times, May 29, 2012.

  16. 16.

    Interview with senior official, SEV, June 24, 2014; interview with senior advisor to the President of SEV, June 23, 2014; interview with former senior official, SEV, June 25, 2014.

  17. 17.

    Linda Weiss, “The State in the Economy: Neoliberal or Neoactivist?” in Glenn Morgan et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 183–209.

  18. 18.

    Also see Öniş and Şenses, “Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and Reactive State,” METU Studies in Development.

  19. 19.

    That being said, I should underline that the long-term causes of political polarization, political patronage, clientelism, and lopsided state-business and state-labor relations are beyond the scope of this study.

  20. 20.

    For a discussion on comparative political economy of labor markets in Greece and Turkey, see Özgün Sarımehmet Duman, The Political Economy of Labour Market Reforms: Greece, Turkey and the Global Economic Crisis (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).

  21. 21.

    For an early review, see Tommasia and Velascoa, “Where Are We in the Political Economy of Reform,” The Journal of Policy Reform. Also see, Allan Drazen and William Easterly, “Do Crises Induce Reform? Simple Empirical Tests of Conventional Wisdom,” Economics and Politics 13, no. 2 (2001): 129–157.

  22. 22.

    Rodrik, “Understanding Economic Policy Reform,” Journal of Economic Literature, 27.

  23. 23.

    Boin, McConnell and ‘t Hart, eds., Governing After Crisis.

  24. 24.

    Kostas A. Lavdas, Spyridon N. Litsas, and Dimitrios V. Skiadas, Stateness and Sovereign Debt: Greece in the European Conundrum (New York: Lexington Books, 2013).

  25. 25.

    Ulrich Beck, German Europe (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013). For the structure of economic exchange mechanisms between Germany and southern Europe that underpin unbearable power asymmetries, see Annamaria Simonazzi, Andrea Ginzburg, and Gianluigi Nocella, “Economic Relations Between Germany and the Southern Europe,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37, no. 3 (2013): 653–675.

  26. 26.

    Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 16.

  27. 27.

    Zahariadis, “The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects,” 74.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., 80.

  29. 29.

    Bakır, “Policy Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change,” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 593.

  30. 30.

    Matthias Matthijs, “Mediterranean Blues: The Crisis in Southern Europe,” Journal of Democracy 25, no. 1 (2014): 102.

References

  • Alderman, Liz and Jack Ewing. “Most Aid to Athens Circles Back to Europe.” New York Times, May 29, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakır, Caner. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change: Multilevel Governance of Central Banking Reform.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 22, no. 4 (2009): 571–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. German Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul ‘t Hart. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Shawn. “Power Politics and the Undersupply of Financial Stability in Europe.” Review of International Political Economy 21, no. 4 (2014): 980–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, Allan, and William Easterly. “Do Crises Induce Reform? Simple Empirical Tests of Conventional Wisdom.” Economics and Politics 13, no. 2 (2001): 129–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duman, Özgün Sarımehmet. The Political Economy of Labour Market Reforms: Greece, Turkey and the Global Economic Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouskas, Vassilis K., and Constantine Dimoulas. Greece, Financialization, and the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambarotto, Francesca, and Stefano Solari. “The Peripheralization of Southern European Capitalism within the EMU.” Review of International Political Economy, ifirst version (2014): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. “The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis.” German Politics 21, no. 4 (2012): 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyman, E. Fuat, and Ahmet İçduygu. “Introduction: Citizenship, Identity, and the Question of Democracy in Turkey.” In Citizenship in a Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences, edited by E. Fuat Keyman, and Ahmet İçduygu, 1–28. London: Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Atul, Peter Evans, Peter J. Katzenstein, Adam Przeworski, Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, James C. Scott, and Theda Skocpol. “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium.” World Politics 48, no. 1 (1995): 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavdas, Kostas A., Spyridon N. Litsas, and Dimitrios V. Skiadas. Stateness and Sovereign Debt: Greece in the European Conundrum. New York: Lexington Books, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24, no. 2 (1999): 5–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijs, Matthias. “Mediterranean Blues: The Crisis in Southern Europe.” Journal of Democracy 25, no. 1 (2014): 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehru, Jawaharlal. Jawaharlal Nehru's Speeches 19491953. New Delhi: The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Ziya, and Fikret Şenses. “Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and Reactive State: Major Policy Shifts in Post-War Turkish Economic Development.” METU Studies in Development, no. 34 (2007): 251–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pop, Valentina. “Merkel Under Fire for ‘Lazy Greeks’ Comment.” EUobserver, May 19, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXIV (1996): 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonazzi, Annamaria, Andrea Ginzburg, and Gianluigi Nocella. “Economic Relations between Germany and the Southern Europe.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37, no. 3 (2013): 653–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasia, Mariano, and Andrés Velascoa. “Where are we in the Political Economy of Reform.” The Journal of Policy Reform 1, no. 2 (1996): 187–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ünay, Sadık. Neoliberal Globalization and Institutional Reform: The Political Economy of Development Planning in Turkey. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Susan. “Another Turn of the Screw.” New Left Review, no. 75 (2012): 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. “The State in the Economy: Neoliberal or Neoactivist?” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, edited by Glenn Morgan, John Campbell, Colin Crouch, Ove Kai Pedersen, and Richard Whitley, 183–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, Nikolaos. “The Multiple Streams Framework: Structures, Limitations, Prospects.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 65–92. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kutlay, M. (2019). Toward a Comparative Political Economy of Reactive States. In: The Political Economies of Turkey and Greece. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92789-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics