Abstract
The commercialization of any product hinges on consumer acceptance. Genetic engineering has faced an uphill battle in this regard since the introduction of genetically engineered (GE) crops in the 1990s. Public perception of GE animals is generally negative, with biomedical applications being more positively perceived than agricultural applications. To date most GE animals have been developed in private or university laboratories for research purposes. Opposition to GE animals is often conflated with opposition to use of animals in research in general, as well as opposition to aspects of intensive animal agriculture. In general, concerns about animal biotechnology are influenced by (1) views around the moral status of animals, the boundary between “natural” and “unnatural,” and perceived risks and benefits of GE animals to health and the environment (personal and cultural characteristics); (2) the purpose of the application, the method(s) being used, and the motivation of the research group making the genetic modification (research characteristics); (3) the species being modified (animal characteristics). As such, it is difficult to generalize about public perception of GE animals as a discrete category. The first GE food animal approval, the AquAdvantage salmon, in 2015, followed years of regulatory delay partially resulting from the negative public perception of genetic engineering. There are a number of new animal applications in development, enabled by new methods, which specifically target traits for animal health and well-being. A nuanced consideration of these applications by those that are not intrinsically opposed to the technology may positively impact public perception of GE animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abah J, Ishaq MN, Wada AC (2010) The role of biotechnology in ensuring food security and sustainable agriculture. Afr J Biotechnol 9(52):8896–8900
Adalja A, Sell T, McGinty M, Boddie C (2016) Genetically Modified (GM) mosquito use to reduce mosquito-transmitted disease in the us: a community opinion survey. PLOS current outbreaks, 2016 May 25. Edition 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.1c39ec05a743d41ee39391ed0f2ed8d3
Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (2002) Animals and biotechnology. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100419143351/http://www.aebc.gov.uk/aebc/pdf/animals_and_biotechnology_report.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 17:35–54
Arjó G, Portero M, Piñol C, Viñas J, Matias-Guiu X, Capell T, Bartholomaeus A, Parrott W, Christou P (2013) Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: and in depth analysis of the Séralinin et al. study claiming that Roundup™ Ready corn or the Herbicide Roundup™ cause cancer in rats. Transgenic Res 22(2):255–267
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (1999) Ethics, morality and animal biotechnology. http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/documents/animal-biotechnology-pdf/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Blancke S, Van Breusegem F, De Jaeger G, Braeckman J, Van Montagu M (2016) Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition. Trends Plant Sci 20(7):414–418
Bode L, Vraga EK (2015) In related news, that was wrong: the correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. J Commun 65:619–638
Bredahl L (2001) Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food—results of a cross-national survey. J Consum Policy 24(1):23–61
Carlson DF, Lancto CA, Zang B, Kim ES, Walton M, Oldeschulte D, Seabury C, Sonstegard TS, Fahrenkrug SC (2016) Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines. Nat Biotech 34:479
Carroll D, Charo RA (2015) The societal opportunities and challenges of genome editing. Genome Biol 16:242
Caswell M, Fuglie K, Klotz C (2003) Agricultural biotechnology: an economic perspective. Novinka Books, New York
Ceccoli S, Hixon W (2011) Explaining attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the European Union. Int Polit Sci Rev 33(3):301–319
Cooke JG, Downie R (2010) African perspectives on genetically modified crops: assessing the debate in Zambia, Kenya, and South Africa. http://csis.org/files/publication/100701_Cooke_AfricaGMOs_WEB.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (2010) Ethical implications of animal biotechnology: considerations for animal welfare decision making. http://www.cast-science.org/publications/?ethical_implications_of_animal_biotechnology_considerations_for_animal_welfare_decision_making&show=product&productID=2952. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Crawford SC (2003) Hindu bioethics for the twenty-first century. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
Critchley CR (2008) Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Underst Sci 17(3):309–327
Curtis KR, Moeltner K (2007) The effect of consumer risk perceptions on the propensity to purchase genetically modified foods in Romania. Agribusiness 23(2):563–278
De Witt A, Osseweijer P, Pierce R (2015) Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the "Integrative Worldview Framework". Public Underst Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 0963662515592364, E-pub ahead of print July 3, 2015
Driscoll JW (1992) Attitudes towards animal use. Anthrozoös 5:32–39
Driscoll J (1995) Attitudes toward animals: species ratings. Soc Anim 3(2):139–150
Einsiedel EF (2005) Public perceptions of transgenic animals. Rev Sci Tech 24(1):149–157
Epstein R (1998) Buddhism and biotechnology. http://online.sfsu.edu/repstein/GEessays/Buddhism%20and%20Biotechnology.htm. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Finucane ML (2002) Mad cows, mad corn and mad communities: the role of socio-cultural factors in the perceived risk of genetically-modified food. Proc Nutr Soc 61(1):31–37
Flipse SM, Osseweijer P (2013) Media attention to GM food cases: an innovation perspective. Public Underst Sci 22(2):185–202
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009) Codex Alimentarius. Rome, Italy
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013) Biotechnologies at work for smallholders: case studies from developing countries in crops, livestock and fish
Forsberg CW, Meidinger RG, Liu M, Cottrill M, Golovan S, Phillips JP (2013) Integration, stability and expression of the E. coli phytase transgene in the Cassie line of Yorkshire Enviropig. Transgenic Res 22(2):379–389
Frewer L, Miles S, Marsh R (2002) The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Anal 22(4):701–711
Frewer L, Lassen J, Kettlitz B, Scholderer J, Beekman V, Berdal KG (2004) Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food Chem Toxicol 42(7):1181–1193
Frewer L, Bergmann K, Brennan M, Lion R, Meertens R, Rowe G et al (2011) Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Food Sci Technol 22:442–456
Frewer L, van der Lans I, Fischer A, Reinders M, Menozzi D, Zhang X et al (2013) Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci Tech 30:142–152
Furnham A, McManus C, Scott D (2003) Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoös 16(2):135–146
Gabriel KI, Rutledge BH, Barkley CL (2012) Attitudes on animal research predict acceptance of genetic modification technologies by university undergraduates. Soc Anim 20:381–400
Gallegos J (2017) GMO salmon caught in U.S. regulatory net, but Canadians have eaten 5 tons. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/08/04/gmo-salmon-caught-in-u-s-regulatory-net-but-canadians-have-eaten-5-tons/?utm_term=.0d6ec3f269fc. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ganiere P, Chern WS, Hahn D (2006) A continuum of consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the United States. J Agr Resour Econ 31(1):129–149
Gaskell G, Allum N, Bauer M, Durant J, Allansdottir A, Bonfadelli H et al (2000) Biotechnology and the European public. Nat Biotechnol 18(9):935–938
Gaskell G, Allum NC, Stares SR (2003) Europeans and biotechnology in 2002: Eurobarometer 58.0. European Commission, Brussels
Gaskell G, Allum N, Wagner W, Kronberger N, Torgersen H, Hampel J, Bardes J (2004) GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Anal 24(1):185–194
Gjerris M (2012) Animal biotechnology: the ethical landscape. In: Brunk CG, Hartley S (eds) Designer animals: mapping the issues in animal biotechnology. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Gordon JW, Scangos GA, Plotkin DJ, Barbosa JA, Ruddle FH (1980) Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by microinjection of purified DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77(12):7380–7384
Grunert KG, Bech-Larsen T, Lahteenmaki L, Ueland O, Astrom A (2004) Attitudes towards the use of GMOs in food production and their impact on buying intention: the role of positive sensory experience. Agribusiness 20(1):95–107
Gupta N, Fischer A, Frewer L (2011) Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: a review. Public Underst Sci 21(7):782–795
Hagelin J, Hau J, Carlsson HE (1999) Undergraduate university students' views of the use of animals in biomedical research. Acad Med 74(10):1135–1137
Hagelin J, Carlsson HE, Hau J (2003) An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Underst Sci 12:67–81
Hallerman E, Grabau E (2016) Crop biotechnology: a pivotal moment for global acceptance. Food Energy Secur 5(1):3–17
Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Aquino HL, Cuite CL, Lang JT (2003) Public perceptions of genetically modified foods: a national study of American knowledge and opinion (RR-1003-004). Food Policy Institute, Cook College, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ, Ebert KM, Brinster RL (1985) Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection. Nature 315(6021):680–683
Herzog HA, Galvin S (1997) Common sense and the mental lives of animals: an empirical approach. In: Mitchell RW (ed) Anthropormorphism, anecdotes and animals. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 237–253
Hess S, Lagerkvist CJ, Redekop W, Pakseresht A (2013) Consumers’ evaluation of biotechnology in food products: new evidence from a meta-survey. Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2013 AAEA & CAES joint annual meeting, Washington, DC. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/151148/2/Consumers%20Evaluation%20of%20Biotechnology%20in%20Food%20Products%202013%20final.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Hoban TJ (2004) Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology (ESA Working Paper No. 04-09). http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/23810/1/wp040009.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Houghton JR, Rowe G, Frewer LJ, Van Kleef E, Chryssochoidis G, Kehagia O et al (2008) The quality of food risk management in Europe: perspectives and priorities. Food Policy 33:13–26
Hudson J, Caplanova A, Novak M (2015) Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains. Appetite 92:303–313
International Food Information Council (2014) Consumer perceptions of food technology survey. http://www.foodinsight.org/surveys/2014-food-technology-survey. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ipsos Social Research Institute (2013) Community attitudes towards emerging technology issues—biotechnology (ISRI Project 12-025766-01). http://www.industry.gov.au/industry/IndustrySectors/nanotechnology/Publications/Documents/Emergingtechstudybio.docx. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
James C (2016) Global status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops 2016. ISAAA brief no. 52. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY
Jasper J, Nelkin D (1992) The animal rights crusade. The Free Press, New York, NY
Jayaraman K, Jia H (2012) GM phobia spreads in South Asia. Nat Biotechnol 30(11):1017–1019
Kaiser M (2005) Assessing ethics and animal welfare in animal biotechnology for farm production. Rev Sci Tech 24(1):75–87
Kalof L, Dietz T, Stern PC, Guagnano GA (1999) Social psychosocial and structural influences on vegetarian beliefs. Rural Sociol 64:500–511
Kendall HA, Lobao LM, Sharp JS (2006) Public concern with animal well-being: place, social structural location, and individual experience. Rural Sociol 71(3):399–428
Knight A (2009) Perceptions, knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process. Public Underst Sci 18(2):177–188
Knight S, Barnett L (2008) Justifying attitudes towards animal use: a qualitative study of people's views and beliefs. Anthrozoös 21:31–42
Knight S, Nunkoosing K, Vrig A, Cherryman J (2003) Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes towards how animals are used. Soc Anim 11:179–198
Knight S, Vrij A, Cherryman J, Nunkoosing K (2004) Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind. Anthrozoös 17(1):43–62
Knight JG, Mather DW, Holdsworth DK, Ermen DF (2007) Acceptance of GM food—an experiment in six countries. Nat Biotechnol 25(5):507–508
Kronberger N, Wagner W, Nagata M (2013) How natural is “more natural”? The role of method, type of transfer, and familiarity for public perceptions of cisgenic and transgenic modification. Sci Commun:1–25
Lazaris A, Arcidiaconon S, Huang Y, Zhou J-F, Duguay F, Chretien N, Karatzas CN (2002) Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 295:472–476
Leahy PJ, Mazur A (1980) The rise and fall of public opposition in specific social movements. Social Stud Sci 10(3):259–284
Li R, Wang Q, McHughen A (2015) Chinese government reaffirms backing for GM products. Nat Biotechnol 33(10):1029
Logar N, Pollock LK (2005) Transgenic fish: is a new policy framework necessary for a new technology? Environ Sci Policy 8(1):17–27
Lund TB, McKeegan DEF, Cribbin C, Sandoe P (2016) Animal ethics profiling of vegetarians, vegans and meat-eaters. Anthrozoös 29(1):89–106
Lusk J, Murray S (2015) Food demand survey. FooDS 2(9):1–5
Lusk J, McFadden B, Rickard B (2015) Which biotech foods are most acceptable to the public? Biotechnol J 10:13–16
Marchant GE, Stevens YA (2016) A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation. GM Crops & Food 64(4):233–242
Marques M, Critchley C, Walshe J (2015) Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: how trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Underst Sci 24(5):601–618
McColl KA, Clarke B, Doran TJ (2013) Role of genetically engineered animals in future food production. Aust Vet J 91(3):113–117
Melodlesi A (2011) Vatican panel backs GMOs. Nat Biotechnol 29(1):11
Mielby H, Sandøe P, Lassen J (2012) The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies. Public Underst Sci 22(2):155–168
Moerbeek H, Casimir G (2005) Gender differences in consumers' acceptance of genetically modified foods. Int J Consum Stud 29(4):308–318
Mora C, Menozzi D, Kleter G, Aramyan L, Valeeva N, Zimmerman K, Reddy G (2012) Factors affecting the adoption of genetically modified animals in the food and pharmaceutical chains. Bio-based Appl Econ 1(3):313–329
Navaro J, Maldonado E, Pedraza C, Cavas M (2001) Attitudes among animal research among psychology students in Spain. Psychol Rep 89:227–236
Network of African Science Academies (2015) Harnessing modern agricultural biotechnology for Africa’s economic development: recommendations to policymakers. http://www.interacademies.net/File.aspx?id=28031. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Novoselova T, Meuwissen M, Huirne R (2007) Adoption of GM technology in livestock production chains: an integrating framework. Food Sci Technol 18:175–188
Ormandy E (2009) Worldwide trends in the use of animals in research: the contribution of genetically-modified animal models. ATLA-Altern Lab Anim 37:63–65
Ormandy E, Schuppli C (2014) Public attitudes toward animal research: a review. Animals 4:391–408
Ormandy E, Schuppli C, Weary D (2012) Factors affecting people's acceptance of the use of zebrafish and mice in research. ATLA-Altern Lab Anim 40(6):321–333
Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2007) Options for future discussions on genetically modified and cloned animals. Paper presented at the pew initiative on food and biotechnology workshop, Washington, DC
Pew Research Center (2015) Public and scientists' views on science and society. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Pifer LK (1996) Exploring the gender gap in young adults' attitudes about animal research. Soc Anim 4(1):37–52
Pifer L, Shimizu K, Pifer R (1994) Public attitudes toward public research: some international comparisons. Soc Anim 2:95–113
Pin R, Gutteling J (2009) The development of public perception research in the genomics field: an empirical analysis of the literature in the field. Sci Commun 31(1):57–83
Priest SH (2000) US public opinion divided over biotechnology? Nat Biotechnol 18(9):939–942
Priest SH, Bonfadelli H, Rusanen M (2003) The "trust gap" hypothesis: predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Anal 23(4):751–766
Puduri V, Govindasamy R, Lang JT, Onuango B (2005) I will not eat it with a fox; I will not eat it in a box: what determines acceptance of GM food for American consumers? Choices 20:257–261
Qaim M, Kouser S (2013) Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS One 8(6):e64879
Rodriguez L, Abbott E (2007) Communication, public understanding and attitudes toward biotechnology in developing nations: a meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on agricultural biotechnologies: new frontiers and products—economics, policies and science, Ravello, Italy
Rollin BE (2014) The perfect storm—genetic engineering, science, and ethics. Sci & Educ 23:509–517
Ruane J, Sonnino A (2011) Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries and their possible contribution to food security. J Biotechnol 156(4):356–363
Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, London, UK
Samadi S, Barberousse A (2015) Species. In: Heams PHT, Lecointre G, Silberstein M (eds) Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences. Springer Science, New York, NY
Sanchez D (2015) Genetically modified crops: how attitudes to new technology influence adoption. Australian Council of Learned Academies. http://www.acola.org.au/PDF/SAF05/4Genetically%20modified%20crops.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Sanderson J (2013) Pigoons, Rakunks and Crakers: Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake and genetically engineered animals in a (Latourian) hybrid world. Law and Humanities 7(2):218–239
Sandler RL (2015) Food ethics. Routledge, New York, NY
Scholderer J, Frewer LJ (2003) The biotechnology communication paradox: experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. J Consum Policy 26(2):125–157
Schuppli CA (2011) Decisions about the use of animals in research: ethical reflection by animal ethics committee members. Anthrozoös 24(4):409–425
Schuppli C, Weary D (2010) Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research. Public Underst Sci 19(6):686–697
Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P (2016) Evidence for absolute moral opposition to genetically modified food in the United States. Perspect Psychol Sc 11(3):315–324
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2005) Handbook of the convention on biological diversity including its cartagena protocol on biosafety, 3rd edn. Friesen, Montreal
Shaw A (2002) “It just goes against the grain.” Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK. Public Underst Sci 11(3):273–291
Sheehy H, Legault M, Ireland D (1998) Consumer and biotechnology: a synopsis of survey and focus group research. J Consum Policy 21:359–386
Sherkow JS, Greely HT (2015) The history of patenting genetic material. Annu Rev Genet 49:161–182
Siegrist M (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Anal 20(2):195–203
Smyth SJ, Kerr WA, Phillips PWB (2015) Global economic, environmental and health benefits from GM crop adoption. Glob Food Secur-Agr 7:24–29
Steinhart H (2006) Novel foods and novel processing techniques as threats and challenges to a hypersensitive world. In: Gilissen LJEJ, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HFJ, Bogers RJ (eds) Allergy matters: new approaches to allergy prevention and management, vol 10, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 63–75
Stephan HR (2015) Cultural politics and the transatlantic divide over GMOs: cultures of nature. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK
Swami V, Furnham A, Christopher AN (2008) Free the animals? Investigating attitudes toward animal testing in Britain and the United States. Scand J Psychol 49(3):269–276
Tizard M, Hallerman E, Fahrenkrug S, Newell-McGloughlin M, Gibson J, de Loos F, Wagner S, Laible G, Han JY, D’Occhio M, Kelly L, Lowenthal J, Gobius K, Silva P, Cooper C, Doran T (2016) Strategies to enable the adoption of animal biotechnology to sustainably improve global food safety and security. Transgenic Res 25(5):575–595
Townsend E, Campbell S (2004) Psychological determinants of willingness to tast and purchase genetically modified food. Risk Anal 24(5):1385–1393
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2015) FDA has determined that the aquadvantage salmon is as safe to eat as non-ge salmon. https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm472487.htm Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Vazquez-Salat N (2013) Are good ideas enough? The impact of socio-economic and regulatory factors on GMO commercialisation. Biol Res 46(4):317–322
Vazquez-Salat N, Houdebine L (2013) Will GM animals follow the GM plant fate? Transgenic Res 22(1):5–13
Veil SR, Reno J, Freihaut R, Oldham J (2015) Online activists vs. Kraft foods: a case of social media hijacking. Public Relat Rev 41:103–108
Vis F (2014) To tackle the spread of misinformation online we must first understand it. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/24/tackle-spread-misinformation-online. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Wagner W, Kronberger N, Nagata M, Sen R, Holtz P, Palacios F (2010) Essentialist theory of ‘hybrids’: from animal kinds to ethnic categories and race. Asian J Soc Psychol 13(4):232–246
Waltz E (2016) GM salmon declared fit for dinner plates. Nat Biotechnol 34(1):7–9
Waltz E (2017) First genetically engineered salmon sold in Canada. Nature 548:148
Wells DL, Hepper PG (1997) Pet ownership and adults' views on animal use. Soc Anim 5:45–63
World Health Organization (2016) Glossary: food security. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4671e/y4671e06.htm. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
YouGov (2016) Survey. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/qcjryhyo22/tabs_HP_Science_20160410.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge research funding support from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant (BRAG) program, US Department of Agriculture, under award numbers 2011-68004-30367, 2013-68004-20364, 2015-67015-23316, 2015-33522-24106, and 2017-33522-27097-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Eenennaam, A.L., Young, A.E. (2018). Public Perception of Animal Biotechnology. In: Niemann, H., Wrenzycki, C. (eds) Animal Biotechnology 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92348-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92348-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92347-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92348-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)