Skip to main content

Towards a Normative Model for the Practice of Cooperation in Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion ((NASR,volume 5))

Abstract

The development cooperation of wealthy with poor countries—whose modern version started in 1949—is currently much debated. Despite improvements in some countries—notably China—and significant results in social sectors, development cooperation has not, in a sustainable way, eradicated massive severe poverty. Moreover, it never could have since it is a manifestation of modernity-gone-wild with its unsustainable systems of mass production and consumption and unequal power relations. This situation raises the question of whether a normative view of development work could be formulated to avoid the pitfalls of unrealistic expectations, on the one hand, and a reduced economistic approach, on the other.

A normative analysis of the practice of development cooperation leads to the conclusion that this practice is founded in and qualified by the formative aspect with meaning-oriented deliberate shaping as normative principle. Religion and worldview play an important role in the direction in which the practice is developing. The view of “development” forms an important element in the directional side of development cooperation. Development in this view is not primarily economic growth, but value realization as the result of cooperative human action in social practices and institutions. Development cooperation should support people in such value realization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Support to poor countries has been called “aid,” or “assistance” for many years. More recently in The Netherlands, the term “development cooperation” has become standard, even though in 2010 the WRR argued that it would be more realistic to speak about assistance (WRR 2010).

  2. 2.

    “It means that 1.22 billion people lived on less than $1.25 a day in 2010, compared with 1.91 billion in 1990,…”; http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview; accessed 25–11–2013.

  3. 3.

    “In all, 2.4 billion people lived on less than US $2 a day in 2010” (World Bank 2013).

  4. 4.

    Even though in philosophy the fact-value split and the character of moral law continues to be debated, in scientific technical as well in public policy discourses the modernist view as presented appears to be predominant. Cf. (Staudinger and Behler 1976; Schuurman 2003; Hottois 1996).

  5. 5.

    The present crisis in development cooperation in many traditional donor countries could well be a symptom of the crisis of certain aspects of modernity; notably, the belief in the rationality and makeability of the world and the role of big institutions.

  6. 6.

    This council provides the description of development in the report mentioned above. It should be noted that the WRR describes modernization primarily in terms of the great institutions of modernity, such as the democratic state with its rule of law and governance bodies, the system of economic production, education, health care, and civil society organizations, etc. It does not deal with the cultural/philosophical backgrounds as presented above.

  7. 7.

    Brazil, Russia, India, China; and sometimes South Africa is also mentioned.

References

  • Adams, W.M. 2009. Green development. Environment and sustainability in a developing world. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, Anna. 2010. Assessing the impact of faith: A methodological contribution, Praxis Note No. 55. Oxford: Intrac; available from http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/690/Praxis-Note-55-Assessing-the-Impact-of-Faith.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec, 2013.

  • Alkira, Sabina. 2006. Religion and development. In The Elgar companion to development economics, ed. David A. Clark, 502–509. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, Necati. 2010. Human nature versus the nature of science and technology: The need for humane science and technology. In Different cultures, one world. Dialogue between christians and muslims about globalizing technology, ed. H. Jochemsen and J. van der Stoep. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, R. 1995. The myth of religious neutrality. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L., S. Vermeulen, R. Leonard, and J. Keeley. 2009. Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London: IIED/FAO/IFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schutter, O. 2010. Report submitted by the special rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter. New York: United Nations. Human rights Council doc.A/HRC/16/49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, McDuie-Ra, and John A. Rees. 2010. Religious actors, civil society and the development agenda: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion. Journal of International Development 22: 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudzwaard, B., M. VanderVennen, and D. van Heemst. 2007. Hope in troubled times. A new vision for confronting global crises. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. 2004. Heresies. Against progress and other illusions. London: Granta books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardini, R. 1963. Religie en openbaring. Hilversum: Lannoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenen, H. 2012. Sage filosofie. Pleidooi voor Afrikaanse wegen naar zelfstandigheid. Antwerpen: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hottois, Gilbert. 1996. Symbool en techniek. (translation of Philosophie et technosciences, 1995). Kampen: Kok.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Rick. 2009. What is distinctive about FBOs? How european FBOs define and operationalize their faith, Praxis Paper 22. Oxford: Intrac; available from http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/482/Praxis-Paper-22-What-is-Distinctive-About-FBOs.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2013.

  • Jochemsen, H. 2006. Normative practices as an intermediate between theoretical ethics and morality. Philosophia Reformata 71: 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Opdat het gras weer bloeie. Ontwikkeling, levenswetenschappen en religie. Rede gehouden bij de openbare aanvaarding van het ambt van bijzonder hoogleraar in de Reformatorische Wijsbegeerte aan de Wageningen Universiteit en Researchcentrum. Wageningen: WUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Van geven naar delen [From Giving to Sharing]. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochemsen, H., and C.J. Reinecke. 2011. Three models for embedding biomedical practices in a traditional cultural context. Genomics & metabolomics in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. In From technology transfer to intercultural development. A disclosive vision of technology for a globalizing world, ed. J. van der Stoep and S. Strijbos. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Terry L. 2004. Oil-led development: Social, political, and economic consequences encyclopedia of energy. Vol. 4, 661–672. Amsterdam: Elsevier Also available from http://politicalscience.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/documents/KarlEoE.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B.B. et al. 2011. Effects of industrial agriculture on climate change and the mitigation potential of small-scale agro-ecological farms. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 6: (No. 020). Also available from http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews/FullTextPDF/2011/20113201156.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2013.

  • MacIntyre, A. 1985. After virtue. A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D., and A.L. St Clair. 2009. Global poverty, ethics and human rights. The role of multilateral organizations, Series Rethinking globalization. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, John. 1990. A green GNP. Dollars and sense. Nov 1990. pp. 6–8. http://wheatoncollege.edu/faculty/files/2011/07/AGreenGNP.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2013.

  • Ovaska, Tomi.2003. The failure of development aid. Cato Journal 23 (2): 175–188; also available from http://www.freetheworld.com/papers/Ovaska.pdf. Accessed on 6 Dec 2013.

  • Petersen, Marie J. 2010. International religious NGOs at the United Nations: A study of a group of religious organizations. The Journal of Humanitarian Cooperation. Available from, http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/847. Accessed 6 Dec 2013.

  • Richards, P. 2010. A green revolution from below? science and technology for global food security and poverty alleviation, Farewell address upon retiring as professor of Technology and Agrarian development. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksoverheid. 2011. Resulaten in ontwikkeling. Available from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/ontwikkelingssamenwerking/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2011/09/07/resultaten-in-ontwikkeling-2009-2010.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2013.

  • Ruivenkamp, G. 2008. Biotechnology in development: Experiences from the South. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers (book plus DVD).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, E. 2003. Faith and hope in technology. Toronto: Clements Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, H., and W. Behler. 1976. Chance und Risiko der Gegenwart. Paderborn: F Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, H.S. 1949. Presidential inaugurals. Available from http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres53.html. Accessed latest on 6 Dec 2013.

  • van den Berg, H., and R. Nijhoff, red. 2009 Bio-energie. Natuurlijk beter? Duurzame inzet van groene grondstoffen. Kort commentaar nr. 13. Amersfoort: Wetenschappelijk Instituut ChristenUnie.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWalt, B. 2006. When African and Western cultures meet. Potchefstroom: Institute of Contemporary Christianity in Africa, 55ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser J. 2010. Down to earth. Thesis, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, M., and J. Bloemhof. 2011. Duurzaamheid. Kiezen voor kwaliteit. Amsterdam: Buijten en Schipperheijn Motief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, A.M. 1985. Creation regained. Eerdmans: Grand Rapids (MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2012. Available from http://data.worldbank.org/country/indonesia. Accessed 22 Nov 2013.

  • ———. 2013. Poverty overview. Available from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview. Accessed 25 Nov 2013.

  • WRR. 2010. Minder pretentie, meer ambitie. Ontwikkelingshulp die verschil maakt, Rapport van de Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; for an English summary see http://www.wrr.nl/english/content.jsp?objectid=5225; see also http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/ontwikkelingssamenwerking/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2011/09/07/resultaten-in-ontwikkeling-2009-2010.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henk Jochemsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jochemsen, H. (2018). Towards a Normative Model for the Practice of Cooperation in Development. In: Buijs, G., Mosher, A. (eds) The Future of Creation Order. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92147-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics