Skip to main content

Burden and Risk Assessment of Foodborne Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food Safety Economics

Part of the book series: Food Microbiology and Food Safety ((PRACT))

Abstract

Foodborne illness is typically associated with acute gastroenteritis, caused by intestinal infection by bacteria, viruses, or parasites. The actual scope of foodborne disease is however much broader than this. Intestinal infections with common pathogens such as Campylobacter or Salmonella may result in disabling complications, long-term health outcomes, or even death. Furthermore, foodborne hazards include a broad range of microbiological and chemical agents, several of which are able to cause extra-intestinal disease, e.g., central nervous system manifestations due to congenital toxoplasmosis or cancer due to heavy metal exposure.

In addition to the health impacts, the economic burden of foodborne disease affects many segments of society, e.g., the individual who becomes sick from consuming tainted food, the retailer who sells the contaminated product, the food producer who allows contamination, and the government agencies that monitor, investigate, and regulate all incur costs from foodborne disease. Accordingly, economists have been very interested in assessing the costs associated with foodborne disease.

In this chapter, we present an overview of the key methodological approaches that have been used to generate estimates of the health and economic burden of foodborne disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

DALY:

Disability-adjusted life year

EFSA:

European Food Safety Authority

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

FSMA:

Food Safety Modernization Act

GBD:

Global Burden of Disease

QALY:

Quality-adjusted life year

QoL:

Quality of life

RASFF:

Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed

SMPH:

Summary measure of population health

VSL:

Value of statistical life

VSLY:

Value for a statistical life year

WHO:

World Health Organization

WTA:

Willingness to accept

WTP:

Willingness to pay

YLD:

Years lived with disability

YLL:

Years of life lost

References

  • Adler MD. QALY’s and policy evaluation: a new perspective. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2006;6:1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldy JE, Smyth SJ. Heterogeneity in the Value of Life (No. w20206). National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnade C, Calvin L, Kuchler F. Consumer response to a food safety outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 linked to spinach. Appl Econ Perspect Pol. 2009;31:734–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batz MB, Hoffmann S, Morris JG. Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation. J Food Prot. 2012;75:1278–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batz M, Henke E, Kowalcyk B. Long-term consequences of foodborne infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2013;27:599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batz M, Hoffmann S, Morris JG Jr. Disease-outcome trees, EQ-5D scores, and estimated annual losses of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for 14 foodborne pathogens in the United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014;11:395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS. A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J (London). 1965;75:493–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwknegt M, Knol AB, van der Sluijs JP, Evers EG. Uncertainty of population risk estimates for pathogens based on QMRA or epidemiology: a case study of Campylobacter in the Netherlands. Risk Anal. 2014;34:847–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby JC, Frenzen PD. Food safety and product liability. Food Pol. 1999;24:637–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby JC, Roberts T. The economics of enteric infections: human foodborne disease costs. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1851–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Alimentarius Commission Procedural Manual. 16th ed. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. 2006. ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/ProcManuals/Manual_16e.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2017.

  • Devleesschauwer B, Maertens de Noordhout C, Smit GSA, Duchateau L, Dorny P, Stein C, et al. Quantifying burden of disease to support public health policy in Belgium: opportunities and constraints. BMC Public Health. 2014a;14:1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devleesschauwer B, Havelaar AH, Maertens de Noordhout C, Haagsma JA, Praet N, Dorny P, et al. Calculating disability-adjusted life years to quantify burden of disease. Int J Public Health. 2014b;59:565–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devleesschauwer B, Havelaar AH, Maertens de Noordhout C, Haagsma JA, Praet N, Dorny P, et al. DALY calculation in practice: a stepwise approach. Int J Public Health. 2014c;59:571–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devleesschauwer B, Haagsma JA, Angulo FJ, Bellinger DC, Cole D, Döpfer D, et al. Methodological framework for World Health Organization estimates of the global burden of foodborne disease. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142498. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific opinion on the development of a risk ranking framework on biological hazards. EFSA J. 2012;10:2724. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific opinion on the development of a risk ranking toolbox for the EFSA BIOHAZ panel. EFSA J. 2015;13:3939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food safety risk analysis: a guide for national food safety authorities (food and nutrition paper 87). 2006. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0822e/a0822e.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2017.

  • Grace D. Food safety in developing countries: an overview. Hemel Hempstead: Evidence on Demand; 2015. https://doi.org/10.12774/eod_er.oct2015.graced.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grocery Manufacturers Association. Recall execution effectiveness: collaborative approaches to improving consumer safety and confidence. 2010. http://www.gmaonline.org/downloads/research-and-reports/WP_RecallExecution.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2017.

  • Grocery Manufacturers Association. Capturing recall costs: Measuring and recovering the losses. 2011. http://www.gmaonline.org/file-manager/images/gmapublications/Capturing_Recall_Costs_GMA_Whitepaper_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2017.

  • Haagsma JA, Polinder S, Stein CE, Havelaar AH. Systematic review of foodborne burden of disease studies: quality assessment of data and methodology. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;166:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.05.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Haninger K. Willingness to pay for food safety: sensitivity to duration and severity of illness. Am J Agric Econ. 2007;89:1170–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haninger K, Hammitt JK. Diminishing willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year: valuing acute foodborne illness. Risk Anal. 2011;31:1363–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelaar AH, Braunig J, Christiansen K, Cornu M, Hald T, Mangen MJ, et al. Towards an integrated approach in supporting microbiological food safety decisions. Zoonoses Public Health. 2007;54:103–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelaar AH, Kirk MD, Torgerson PR, Gibb HJ, Hald T, Lake RJ, et al. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001923. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DJ, Shogren JF, Shin SY, Kliebenstein JB. Valuing food safety in experimental auction markets. Am J Agric Econ. 1995;77:40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Batz MB, Morris JG Jr. Annual cost of illness and quality-adjusted life year losses in the United States due to 14 foodborne pathogens. J Food Prot. 2012;75:1292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Maculloch B, Batz M. Economic burden of major foodborne illnesses acquired in the United States. EIB-140, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain MA, Dawson CO. Economic impact of food safety outbreaks on food businesses. Foods. 2013;2:585–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. Improving food safety through a one health approach. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keithlin J, Sargeant JM, Thomas MK, Fazil A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of non-typhoidal Salmonella cases that develop chronic sequelae. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1333–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniesner TJ, Viscusi WK, Ziliak JP. Willingness to accept equals willingness to pay for labor market estimates of the value of a statistical life. J Risk Uncertain. 2014;48:187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoumanis KP, Aspridou Z. Moving towards a risk-based food safety management. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2016;12:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangen MJ, Batz MB, Käsbohrer A, Hald T, Morris JG, Taylor M, et al. Integrated approaches for the public health prioritization of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens. Risk Anal. 2010;30:782–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangen MJ, Plass D, Havelaar AH, Gibbons CL, Cassini A, Mühlberger N, BCoDE Consortium, et al. The pathogen- and incidence-based DALY approach: an appropriate [corrected] methodology for estimating the burden of infectious diseases. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauskopf JA, French MT. Estimating the value of avoiding morbidity and mortality from foodborne illnesses. Risk Anal. 1991;11:619–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor T, Lasher A, Klontz K, Brown B, Nardinelli C, Zorn D. The per case and total annual costs of foodborne illness in the United States. Risk Anal. 2015;35:1125–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JJ, Allen PG, Stevens TH, Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environ Res Econ. 2005;30:313–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ. Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72:429–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, Lim S, Lozano R, Michaud C, et al. GBD 2010: design definitions and metrics. Lancet. 2012;380:2063–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Enhancing food safety: the role of the Food and Drug Administration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayga RM, Woodward R, Aiew W. Willingness to pay for reduced risk of foodborne illness: a nonhypothetical field experiment. Can J Agric Econ. 2006;54:461–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollinger M, Guthrie J, Bovay J. The food safety performance of ground beef suppliers to the national school lunch program. ERR-180, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma MA, Ribera LA, Bessler D, Paggi M, Knutson RD. Potential impacts of foodborne illness incidences on market movements and prices of fresh produce in the US. J Agric Appl Econ. 2010;42:731–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter CK, Tribble DR, Aliaga PA, Halvorson HA, Riddle MS. Infectious gastroenteritis and risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:781–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozo VF, Schroeder TC. Evaluating the costs of meat and poultry recalls to food firms using stock returns. Food Pol. 2016;59:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resende-Filho MA, Buhr BL. Economics of traceability for mitigation of food recall costs. SSRN 995335. 2010; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.995335.

  • Ribera LA, Plama MA, Paggi M, Knutson M, Masabni JG, Anciso J. Economic analysis of food safety compliance costs and foodborne illness outbreaks in the United States. HortTechnology. 2012;22:150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T. Human illness costs of foodborne bacteria. Am J Agric Econ. 1989;71:468–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T, Kowalcyk B, Buck P, Blaser MJ, Frenkel JK, Lorber B, et al. The long-term health outcomes of selected foodborne pathogens. The Center for Foodborne Illness Research & Prevention. 2009. http://enhs.umn.edu/news/pdfs/CFIFinalReport.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2017.

  • Salin V, Hooker NH. Stock market reaction to food recalls. Rev Agric Econ. 2001;23:33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon JA, Haagsma JA, Davis A, de Noordhout CM, Polinder S, Havelaar AH, Cassini A, Devleesschauwer B, Kretzschmar M, Speybroeck N, Murray CJ, Vos T. Disability weights for the global burden of disease 2013 study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e712–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00069-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M-A, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff RL. Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States. J Food Prot. 2012;75:123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff RL. State estimates for the annual cost of foodborne illness. J Food Prot. 2015;78:1064–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo S, Jang SS, Miao L, Almanza B, Behnke C. The impact of food safety events on the value of food-related firms: an event study approach. Int J Hosp Manag. 2013;33:153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo S, Jang SS, Almanza B, Miao L, Behnke C. The negative spillover effect of food crises on restaurant firms: did Jack in the box really recover from an E. coli scare? Int J Hosp Manag. 2014;39:107–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin SY, Kliebenstein J, Hayes DJ, Shogren JF. Consumer willingness to pay for safer food products. J Food Saf. 1992;13:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF, Shin SY, Hayes DJ, Kliebenstein JB. Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Am Econ Rev. 1994;84:255–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisl MF, Roe BE. Consumer willingness-to-pay to reduce the probability of retail foodborne pathogen contamination. Food Pol. 2010;35:521–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd EC. Economic loss from foodborne disease and non-illness related recalls because of mishandling by food processors. J Food Prot. 1985;48:621–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA’s draft approach for designating high-risk foods as required by section 204 of FSMA. 2014. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/guidanceregulation/fsma/ucm380212.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2017.

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA food safety modernization act (FSMA). 2017. https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/default.htm. Accessed 08 May 2017.

  • U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Circular A-4: Regulatory analysis. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Management and Budget; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Aldy JE. The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain. 2003;27:5–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 2000–2011. Global Health Estimates Technical Paper. WHO/HIS/HSI/GHE/2013.4. 2013. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/GlobalDALYmethods_2000_2011.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2017.

  • World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/dose_response.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brecht Devleesschauwer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Devleesschauwer, B., Scharff, R.L., Kowalcyk, B.B., Havelaar, A.H. (2018). Burden and Risk Assessment of Foodborne Disease. In: Roberts, T. (eds) Food Safety Economics. Food Microbiology and Food Safety(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92138-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics