Abstract
Originally, Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition ignored Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, on the basis that Hegel’s post-Jena writings moved from intersubjectivism to idealism. More recently, however, Honneth has reconsidered the elements of the Phenomenology that consider recognition. Around the same time that he began re-evaluating Hegel’s discussions of recognition, Honneth developed a theory of “elementary recognition” that is a basic level of affective engagement with one’s environment that must be in place before one can take up cognitive relations to others. On its face, Honneth’s study of Hegel’s Phenomenology and his discussion of elementary recognition would seem to be largely unrelated. But as this paper will show, the two works discuss very similar ideas and complement each other quite well. Furthermore, the expansion of some ideas developed in Honneth’s study of the Phenomenology can help respond to criticisms that have been leveled against his theory of elementary recognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Selected Bibliography
Butler, Judith (1987) Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France. New York: Columbia University Press.
Butler, Judith (2008) “Taking Another’s View: Ambivalent Implications.” In Axel Honneth, with Judith Butler, Raymond Geuss, and Jonathan Lear (eds.) Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Edited by Martin Jay. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–119.
Geuss, Raymond. “Philosophical Anthropology and Social Criticism.” In Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, 120–130.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977) Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Honneth, Axel (1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Joel Anderson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Honneth, Axel (2007) “The Social Dynamics of Disrespect: On the Location of Critical Theory Today.” Translated by John Farrell. In Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity, 63–79.
Honneth, Axel (2008) “Reification and Recognition: A New Look at an Old Idea.” Translated by Joseph Ganahl. In Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, 17–94.
Honneth, Axel (2008) “Rejoinder.” Translated by Joseph Ganahl. In Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, 147–159.
Honneth, Axel (2012) “Facets of the Presocial Self: Rejoinder to Joel Whitebook.” In The I in We, 217–231.
Honneth, Axel (2012) “From Desire to Recognition: Hegel’s Grounding of Self-Consciousness.” Translated by Joseph Ganahl. In The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 3–17.
Honneth, Axel (2012) “Preface.” In The I in We, vii–xi.
Honneth, Axel (2014) Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by Joseph Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jütten, Timo (2010) “What Is Reification? A Critique of Axel Honneth.” Inquiry, vol. 53, no. 3: 235–256.
Kant, Immanuel (1964) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by H. J. Paton. New York: Harper.
Lear, Jonathan (2008) “The Slippery Middle.” In Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, 131–143.
McDowell, John (2009) “The Apperceptive I and the Empirical Self: Towards a Heterodox Reading of ‘Lordship and Bondage’ in Hegel’s Phenomenology.” In Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Neuhauser, Frederick (1986) “Deducing Desire and Recognition in the Phenomenology of Spirit.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 24: 243–262.
Oostenbroek, Janine, Thomas Suddendorf, Mark Nielsen, Jonathan Redshaw, Siobhan Kennedy-Costantini, Jacqueline Davis, Sally Clark and Virginia Slaughter (2016) “Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans.” Current Biology, vol. 26: 1–5.
Redding, Paul (2008) “The Independence and Dependence of Self-Consciousness: The Dialect of Lord and Bondsman in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.” In Frederick C. Beiser (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94–110.
Varga, Somogy (2010) “Critical Theory and the Two-Level Account of Recognition—Towards a New Foundation?” Critical Horizons, vol. 11, no. 1: 19–33.
Varga, Somogy and Shaun Gallagher (2012) “Critical Social Philosophy, Honneth and The Role of Primary Intersubjectivity.” European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2: 243–260.
Whitebook, Joel (2001) “Mutual Recognition and the Work of the Negative.” In William Rehg and James Bohman (eds.) Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory, Essays in Honor of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 257–291.
Zurn, Christopher (2015) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berendzen, J.C. (2019). Reciprocity and Self-Restriction in Elementary Recognition. In: Schmitz, V. (eds) Axel Honneth and the Critical Theory of Recognition. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91980-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91980-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91979-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91980-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)