Abstract
We describe an operational procedure to build an integrated information system (IIS) for monitoring and evaluating the performance of public broadcasting corporations (PBC). The procedure grounds in a conceptual framework derived from evaluation models, and consists of two stages. The first stage is the selection, through expert judgment, of simple indicators that illustrate the most relevant aspects of the corporations. The second stage is the definition of a system of indicators related to each level of the hierarchy of objectives planned by the corporations. The system of indicators has two levels. The first level is a basic indicator system that allows description and monitoring of the reality of the activities of a corporation on a daily basis. The second level consists of a strategic indicator system, which expresses the consequences that the activities of a PBC generate in its environment, both as short-term effects and as medium and long-term impacts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Amsterdam Protocol on Public Service Broadcasting, 17 June 1997.
- 2.
Specifications of France Télévisions, decree 2009-796, 23 June 2009.
- 3.
RTÉ, Strategy 2012–2017.
References
Bakewell, O., Garbutt, A.: The use and abuse of the logical framework approach INTRAC technical report, SIDA (2005)
Carrasco, S. (coord.): Cómo evaluar proyectos de cultura para el desarrollo: una aproximación metodológica a la construcción de indicadores. AECID, Madrid (2009)
Coll-Serrano, V., Carrasco-Arroyo, S., Blasco-Blasco, O., Vila-Lladosa, L.: Design of a basic system of indicators for monitoring and evaluating spanish cooperation’s culture and development strategy. Eval. Rev. 36, 272–302 (2012)
Coll-Serrano, V., Blasco-Blasco, O., Carrasco-Arroyo, S., Vila-Lladosa, L.: Un sistema de indicadores para el seguimiento y evaluación de la gestión sostenible del patrimonio cultural. Transinformaçao 25, 55–63 (2013)
Dalkey, N., Brown B., Cochran S.: The Delphi method III: Use of self rating to improve group estimates. Research Memorandum, RM-6115-PR, CA: The Rand Corporation (1969)
Dalkey, N.C., Helmer, O.: An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage. Sci. 9, 458–467 (1963)
Gordon, T. J.: The Delphi method. AC/UNU Millennium Project, http://www.gerenciamento.ufba.br/downloads/delphi_method.pdf (1994)
Hallowell, M.R., Gambatese, J.A.: Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136, 99–107 (2010)
Hammond, A. L., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., Woodward, D.: Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resources Institute (1995)
Hanafin, S., Brooks, A.-M., Carroll, E., Fitzgerald, E., Gabhainn, S.N., Sixsmith, J.: Achieving consensus in developing a national set of child well-being indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 80, 79–104 (2007)
Hasselbring, W.: Information system integration. Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 43, 32–38 (2000)
Joint Research Centre-European Commission: Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and User guide. OECD (2008)
Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42, 361–371 (1991)
Landeta, J.: El Método Delphi. Una Técnica de Previsión Para la Incertidumbre. Ariel, Barcelona (1999)
Landeta, J.: Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 73, 467–482 (2006)
Linstone, H. A., Turoff, M.: The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)
Loo, R.: The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: Int. J. Police Strat. and Manag. 25, 762–769 (2002)
Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf. Manag. 42, 15–29 (2004)
Saisana, M., Tarantola, S.: State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Commission, EUR 20408 EN, Joint Research Centre (2002)
Sartorius, R.H.: The logical framework approach to project design and management. Am. J. Eval. 12, 139–147 (1991)
Stufflebeam, D., Shinkfield, A.: Evaluación Sistemática: Guía Teórica y Práctica. Paidós Ibérica, Barcelona (2002)
Wilhelm, W.J.: Alchemy of the oracle: The Delphi technique. Delta Pi Epsilon J. 43, 6–26 (2001)
Worthen, B.R., Sanders, J.R.: Educational Evaluation. Longman, New York (1987)
Zolingen, S.J., Klaasen, C.A.: Selection process in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 70, 317–340 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blasco-Blasco, O., Pérez, P.J., Vila, L.E. (2019). A System of Indicators for Evaluating Public Broadcasting Corporations. In: Túñez-López, M., Martínez-Fernández, VA., López-García, X., Rúas-Araújo, X., Campos-Freire, F. (eds) Communication: Innovation & Quality. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 154. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91860-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91860-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91859-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91860-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)