Skip to main content

Language, Speech, and Movement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kinesthetic Spectatorship in the Theatre

Part of the book series: Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance ((CSLP))

  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter (“Language, Speech, Movement”) considers the function of language and verbal performance in the kinesthetic interchange between actors and spectators. Drawing upon the work of cognitive scientists and linguists, it explores two ways that language and speech condition theatrical kinesthesis. The first is through utterance, the kinetic process by which the body moves to produce meaningful sound. The second is through language itself, which—grounded in the body’s sensorimotor capacities—carries its own, linguistically embodied modes of action. In addition to continuing the discussion of Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming begun in Chap. 4, this chapter includes discussions of Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, Shakespeare’s King Lear and Macbeth, and Complicite’s immersive theatre production The Encounter, with Simon McBurney.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jacques Lecoq, The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre, 52.

  2. 2.

    Lecoq does not distinguish between emotion and movement: “Etymologically, the word emotion means ‘setting in motion’” (Moving Body, 48). This understanding parallels Sheets-Johnstone’s phenomenological insight: “In the ordinary course of everyday life, the affective and the kinetic are clearly dynamically congruent: emotion and movement coincide” (Primacy of Movement, 454).

  3. 3.

    Lecoq, Moving Body, 51.

  4. 4.

    See Stanton B. Garner Jr., Bodied Spaces, 120–158. While the embodied nature of language and the conceptual structures it represents have become an important topic in cognitive science and linguistics since the late 1980s, the phenomenological account of these is comparatively undeveloped.

  5. 5.

    Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, 200.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 199.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    David McNeill, Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought, 2.

  10. 10.

    Alvin M. Liberman and Doug H. Whalen, “On the Relation of Speech to Language,” 188.

  11. 11.

    Alvin M. Liberman and Ignatius G. Mattingly, “The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised,” 2.

  12. 12.

    Luciano Fadiga et al., “Speech Listening Specifically Modulates the Excitability of Tongue Muscles: a TMS Study,” 401. A different experiment by K. E. Watkins et al. also associated auditory and visual speech perception with increased activity in the motor system involved in speech production (“Seeing and Hearing Speech Excites the Motor System Involved in Speech Production”).

  13. 13.

    Fadiga et al., “Speech Listening,” 401.

  14. 14.

    Andew N. Meltzoff, “Elements of a Developmental Theory of Imitation,” 28. Also see Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies et al., “A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Vowel Formants in Babbling.”

  15. 15.

    For fuller discussions of Struck Dumb, see Garner, Bodied Spaces, 120–22.

  16. 16.

    Bertolt Brecht, Mother Courage and Her Children, 54.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 55.

  18. 18.

    Ibid.

  19. 19.

    This sequence can be found in Tennessee Williams, A Streetcar Named Desire, 59–60.

  20. 20.

    Antonin Artaud, The Theatre and Its Double, 133. Later in the same essay, Artaud observes, “No one in Europe knows how to scream any more, and particularly actors in trance no longer know how to cry out. Since they do nothing but talk and have forgotten they ever had a body in the theater, they have naturally also forgotten the use of their windpipes” (ibid., 141).

  21. 21.

    Elena Passarello, Let Me Clear My Throat, 5.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 6. For a discussion of Brando’s vocal performances in A Streetcar Named Desire and The Godfather, see Katherine Kinney, “The Resonance of Brando’s Voice.”

  23. 23.

    A man also is available on the balcony to stand in for Stanley when his name is shouted.

  24. 24.

    Passarello’s performance can be viewed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-b6BZwfahw

  25. 25.

    Pinter, Homecoming, 34.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 31.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 33.

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    Shaun Gallagher, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 107.

  30. 30.

    Sheets-Johnstone, Primacy of Movement, xxxi (emphasis in original).

  31. 31.

    See George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By; Johnson, The Body in the Mind; and Lakoff and Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh.

  32. 32.

    See Friedemann Pulvermüller, “Brain Mechanisms Linking Language and Action”; Pulvermüller and Luciano Fadiga, “Active Perception: Sensorimotor Circuits as a Cortical Basis for Language”; and Véronique Boulenger et al., “Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Somatic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension.”

  33. 33.

    David Kemmerer, “Action Verbs, Argument Structure Constructions, and the Mirror Neuron System,” 359.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 359. For a discussion of these overlaps in the context of the mirror-neuron model, see G. Buccino et al., “Listening to Action-Related Sentences Modulates the Activity of the Motor System: A Combined TMS and Behavioral Study.”

  35. 35.

    Kemmerer, “Action Verbs,” 361.

  36. 36.

    Guillemette Bolens, The Style of Gestures: Embodiment and Cognition in Literary Narrative, 39.

  37. 37.

    Lakoff and Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh, 576.

  38. 38.

    Dan I. Slobin, “Verbalized Events: A Dynamic Approach to Linguistic Relativity and Determinism,” 108 (italics and underscoring mine).

  39. 39.

    Ibid., 113.

  40. 40.

    Sophocles, The Three Theban Plays, 218.

  41. 41.

    Riverside Shakespeare, 1333.

  42. 42.

    Ibid.

  43. 43.

    Bert States, “Standing on the Extreme Verge in King Lear and Other High Places,” 425.

  44. 44.

    McNeill, Hand and Mind, 23.

  45. 45.

    David McNeill and Susan D. Duncan, “Growth Points in Thinking-for-Speaking,” 150–52.

  46. 46.

    McNeill, Hand and Mind, 245–72.

  47. 47.

    In their cognitive studies of acting, John Lutterbie and Rick Kemp provide fuller analysis of the language–gesture relationship from the performer’s point of view. Both draw upon McNeill’s analysis of this relationship, while Kemp integrates McNeill’s framework with Lecoq’s movement-based actor training. See Lutterbie, Toward a General Theory of Acting, 117–28, and Kemp, Embodied Acting, 63–92. In Cognition in the Globe, Evelyn B. Tribble argues that the coupling of language and gesture was an attentional and communicative resource for early modern actors and playwrights (85–110). Tribble credits Thomas Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy with the technical innovation of “yoking [. . .] action and accent such that the word extends into the world through the medium of the body” (105).

  48. 48.

    Eugene O’Neill, Four Plays by Eugene O’Neill, 120.

  49. 49.

    Ibid.

  50. 50.

    Riverside Shakespeare, 1364.

  51. 51.

    Dench’s performance can be viewed in the 1979 television version of the Royal Shakespeare Company Macbeth, which replicates the staging of the 1976 theatrical production. See Macbeth.

  52. 52.

    Riverside Shakespeare, 1364.

  53. 53.

    For a fuller discussion of this, see Garner, Bodied Spaces, 131–36.

  54. 54.

    George Home-Cook, Theatre and Aural Attention, 167.

  55. 55.

    The Encounter premiered in August 2015 at the Edinburgh International Festival and opened at the London Barbican Theatre six months later. I attended McBurney’s production on tour at New York’s Golden Theatre in December 2016.

  56. 56.

    Complicite and Simon McBurney, The Encounter, 3.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 41.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., 47.

  59. 59.

    The sound of leaves crunching underfoot was produced by McBurney scrunching the plastic packaging of a water multi-pack around the binaural head.

  60. 60.

    Ibid., 48.

Bibliography

  • Artaud, Antonin. 1958. The Theatre and Its Double. Trans. Mary Caroline Richards. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolens, Guillemette. 2012. The Style of Gestures: Embodiment and Cognition in Literary Narrative. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulenger, Véronique, Olaf Hauk, and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2009. Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Somatic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension. Cerebral Cortex 19 (8): 1905–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, Bertolt. 1955. Mother Courage and Her Children. English version by Eric Bentley. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., L. Riggio, G. Melli, F. Binkofski, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti. 2005. Listening to Action-Related Sentences Modulates the Activity of the Motor System: A Combined TMS and Behavioral Study. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (3): 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Complicite and Simon McBurney. 2016. The Encounter. London: Nick Hern.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boysson-Bardies, Bénédicte, Pierre Halle, Laurant Sagart, and Catherine Durand. 1989. A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Vowel Formants in Babbling. Journal of Child Language 16 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadiga, Luciano, Laila Craighero, Giovanni Buccino, and Giacomo Rizzolatti. 2002. Speech Listening Specifically Modulates the Excitability of Tongue Muscles: A TMS Study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15 (2): 399–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, Stanton B., Jr. 1994. Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home-Cook, George. 2015. Theatre and Aural Attention: Stretching Ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, David. 2006. Action Verbs, Argument Structure Constructions, and the Mirror Neuron System. In Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, ed. Michael A. Arbib, 347–373. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, Rick. 2012. Embodied Acting: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Performance. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, Katherine. 2014. The Resonance of Brando’s Voice. Postmodern Culture 24: 3. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/589569. Accessed 20 July 2016.

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecoq, Jacques. 2002. The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre. Trans. David Bradby. Rev. ed. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, Alvin M., and Ignatius G. Mattingly. 1985. The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised. Cognition 21 (1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, Alvin M., and Doug H. Whalen. 2000. On the Relation of Speech to Language. Trends in Cognitive Science 4 (5): 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutterbie, John. 2011. Toward a General Theory of Acting: Cognitive Science and Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth. 2004. Directed for Television by Philip Casson, Performances by Ian McKellan and Judi Dench. 1987. DVD. Santa Monica: Lionsgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, David, and Susan D. Duncan. 2000. Growth Points in Thinking-for-Speaking. In Language and Gesture, ed. David McNeill, 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, Andew N. 2002. Elements of a Developmental Theory of Imitation. In The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases, ed. Andrew N. Meltzoff and Wolfgang Prinz, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Eugene. 1998. Four Plays by Eugene O’Neill. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarello, Elena. 2012. Let Me Clear My Throat. Louisville: Sarabande.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2005. Brain Mechanisms Linking Language and Action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6 (7): 576–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Luciano Fadiga. 2010. Active Perception: Sensorimotor Circuits as a Cortical Basis for Language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (5): 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J.J.M. Tobin, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2011. The Primacy of Movement. Expanded second ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, Dan I. 2000. Verbalized Events: A Dynamic Approach to Linguistic Relativity and Determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, ed. Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven, 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocles. 1982. The Three Theban Plays. Trans. Robert Fagles. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • States, Bert O. 1982. Standing on the Extreme Verge in King Lear and Other High Places. Georgia Review 36 (2): 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribble, Evelyn B. 2011. Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K.E., A.P. Strafella, and T. Paus. 2003. Seeing and Hearing Speech Excites the Motor System Involved in Speech Production. Neurospsychologia 41 (8): 989–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Tennessee. 1947. A Streetcar Named Desire. New York: Signet.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garner, S.B. (2018). Language, Speech, and Movement. In: Kinesthetic Spectatorship in the Theatre. Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91794-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics