Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voicing Bipolar Futures: The Antarctic Treaty System and Arctic Governance in Historical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competing Arctic Futures

  • 476 Accesses

Abstract

The Antarctic Treaty of 1959 has long been held up as a model for enlightened governance of an international space. This chapter asks how and why the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) regularly has been presented as inspiration for potential future Arctic governance regimes during the past half-century. We examine how legal regimes are freighted with temporally specific values (including geopolitical assumptions); and how the outcomes deemed most valuable may be achieved without replication of the specific legal framework. We begin by tracing how the origins of the ATS have been systematically described as exceptional to rather than exemplary of late 1950s Cold War geopolitics. We then consider how and why particular actors invoked the ATS in discussions of multilateral Arctic governance through the 1970s and 1980s. Finally, we discuss how the ATS has been proposed as a solution during the most recent narrative of crisis in the Arctic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antonello, Alessandro. “Nature Conservation and Antarctic Diplomacy, 1959–1964.” The Polar Journal 4, no. 2 (3 July 2014): 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctic Council. “Agreements.” https://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work/agreements.

  • Arctic Ocean Conference. “The Ilulissat Declaration. Arctic Ocean Conference, Ilulissat Greenland 27–28 May 2008,” 2008. http://www.oceanlaw.org/downloads/arctic/Ilulissat_Declaration.pdf.

  • Armstrong, Terence E., George William Rogers, and Graham Rowley. The Circumpolar North: A Political and Economic Geography of the Arctic and Sub-Arctic. London: Methuen, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronova, Elena. “Geophysical Datascapes of the Cold War: Politics and Practices of the World Data Centers in the 1950s and 1960s.” Osiris 32 (2017): 307–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Peter. “Entering the Age of the Polar Regions: The Arctic and Antarctic Are No Longer Poles Apart.” AMBIO 18, no. 1 (1989): 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Peter. The International Politics of Antarctica. London: Croom Helm, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, Paul Arthur. Science into Policy: Global Lessons from Antarctica. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit. “Antarctica Is a Good Example That Science Can Unite the World, Researcher’s Book Says.” Ohio State Research News, 2001. http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/antarctic.htm.

  • Bloomfield, Lincoln P. “The Arctic: Last Unmanaged Frontier.” Foreign Affairs 60, no. 1 (1981): 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn, Barbara. “The Animals Come to Me; They Know I Share: Inupiaq Kinship, Changing Economic Relations and Enduring World Views on Alaska’s North Slope.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bones, Stian. “SCAR as a Healing Process? Reflections on Science and Polar Politics in the Cold War and beyond—The Case of Norway.” In Antarctica and the Humanities, edited by Peder Roberts, Lize-Marié van der Watt, and Adrian Howkins, 231–249. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, Scott. “An Ice Cold War.” The New York Times, August 8, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, Scott. “The Great Game Moves North.” Foreign Affairs, January 8, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabant, Malcolm. “Inuit Hunters’ Plea to the EU: Lift Ban Seal Cull or Our Lifestyle Will Be Doomed.” The Guardian, May 16, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breum, Martin. Når isen forsvinder: Danmark som stormagt i Arktis, Grønlands rigdomme og kampen om nordpolen. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, Murray. “Russia’s New Claim to North Pole Puts Pressure on Canada, Expert Says.” The Globe and Mail, August 4, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Cassandra M., Larry B. Crowder, Lisa M. Curran, Robert B. Dunbar, David G. Ainley, Klaus J. Dodds, Kristina M. Gjerde, and U. Rashid Sumaila. “Science-Based Management in Decline in the Southern Ocean.” Science 354, no. 6309 (14 October 2016): 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, Rip. “The Political Origins of the Antarctic Treaty.” Polar Record 46, no. 1 (January 2010): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, Sanjay. The Polar Regions: A Political Geography. Chichester and New York: Wiley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chown, Steven L. “Antarctic Treaty System Past Not Predictive.” Science 339, no. 6116 (11 January 2013): 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Miyase, Annika E. Nilsson, and Nina Wormbs. “Globalization, Climate Change and the Media: An Introduction.” In Media and the Politics of Arctic Climate Change: When the Ice Breaks, edited by Miyase Christensen, Annika E. Nilsson, and Nina Wormbs, 1–25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corell, Robert, ed. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, Klaus. “Assault on the Unknown: Geopolitics, Antarctic Science, and the International Geophysical Year (1957–8).” In New Spaces of Exploration: Geographies of Discovery in the Twentieth Century, edited by Simon Naylor and James R. Ryan, 148–172. London: Tauris, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, Klaus, and Mark Nuttall. The Scramble for the Poles: The Geopolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel, Ronald E. “Constituting the Postwar Earth Sciences: The Military’s Influence on the Environmental Sciences in the USA After 1945.” Social Studies of Science 33, no. 5 (1 October 2003): 635–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Aant. “Antarctica: The Construction of a Continent by and for Science.” In Denationalizing Science, edited by Elisabeth Crawford, Terry Shinn, and Sverker Sörlin, 73–106. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Aant. “Through the Lens of the Polar Years: Changing Characteristics of Polar Research in Historical Perspective.” Polar Record 45, no. 4 (October 2009): 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. “Resolution of 9 October 2008 on Arctic Governance.” October 9, 2008. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2008-0474&language=EN.

  • Guardian Environment Blogs. “Plan to Create Massive Antarctic Ocean Sanctuaries Blocked by Surprise Challenge from Russia and Ukraine.” The Guardian, July 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Jacob Darwin. Oceanographers and the Cold War: Disciples of Marine Science. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Jacob Darwin. “Mastery of Landscapes and Seascapes. Science at the Strategic Poles during the International Geophysical Year.” In Extremes: Oceanography’s Adventures at the Poles, edited by Keith Rodney Benson and Helen M. Rozwadowski, 201–225. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications/USA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Jacob Darwin. Arming Mother Nature: The Birth of Catastrophic Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, Adrian. “Science, Environment, and Sovereignty: The International Geophysical Year in the Antarctic Peninsula Region.” In Globalizing Polar Science: Reconsidering the International Polar and Geophysical Years, edited by Roger D. Launius, James Rodger Fleming, and David H. DeVorkin, 245–264. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, Adrian. The Polar Regions: An Environmental History. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, Adrian. Frozen Empires: An Environmental History of the Antarctic Peninsula. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSH the Prince Albert of Monaco. “Speech. 50th Anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty. Science-Policy Interactions in International Governance. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.” November 30, 2009. http://www.fpa2.com/downloads/Washington_Antarctic_en.pdf.

  • ICSU/WMO Joint Committee for IPY 2007–2008. “The Scope of Science for the International Polar Year 2007–2008.” Geneva, 2007. http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/ipy-science-plan/IPY-Science-Plan.pdf.

  • Jacobsson, Marie. “Building the International Legal Framework for Antarctica.” In Science Diplomacy: Science, Antarctica, and the Governance of International Spaces, edited by Paul Berkman, Michael A. Lang, David Walton, and Oran Young, 1–16. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, Michael T. “Rushing for the Arctic’s Riches.” The New York Times, December 7, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, Timo, and Erik Molenaar. International Governance and Regulation of the Marine Arctic: Overview and Gap Analysis. Oslo: WWF International Arctic Programme, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige, John. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriwoken, Lorne, Laurence Cordonnery, and Alan D. Hemmings. “Nexus and Imbroglio: CCAMLR, the Madrid Protocol and Designating Antarctic Marine Protected Areas in the Southern Ocean.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 30, no. 4 (23 November 2015): 727–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launius, Roger D., James Rodger Fleming, and David H. DeVorkin, eds. Globalizing Polar Science: Reconsidering the International Polar and Geophysical Years. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowlan, Linda. “Arctic Legal Regime for Environmental Protection.” IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 44. The World Conservation Union, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, Naomi, and John Krige, eds. Science and Technology in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Richard C. and Klaus Dodds, eds. Polar Geopolitics? Knowledges, Resources and Legal Regimes. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raspotnik, Andreas. The European Union and the Geopolitics of the Arctic. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Peder, Klaus Dodds, and Lize-Marié van der Watt. “‘But Why Do You Go There?’ Norway and South Africa in the Antarctic during the 1950s.” In Science, Geopolitics and Culture in the Polar Region: Norden Beyond Borders, edited by Sverker Sörlin, 79–110. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogne, Odd, Volker Rachold, Louwrens Hacquebord, and Bob Corell. 25 Years of International Arctic Research Cooperation: IASC after 25 Years. Potsdam: International Arctic Science Committee (IASC), 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauven, John. “Saving the Arctic Is Environmentalism’s Biggest Challenge yet.” The Guardian, August 24, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Karen N. “Ice and Mineral Resources.” In Exploring the Last Continent: An Introduction to Antarctica, edited by Daniela Liggett, Bryan Storey, Yvonne Cook, and Veronika Meduna, 487–504. Basel: Springer International Publishing, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadian, Jessica. The Politics of Arctic Sovereignty: Oil, Ice and Inuit Governance. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Justine D, Aleks Terauds, Martin J. Riddle, Hugh P. Possingham, and Steven L. Chown. “Antarctica’s Protected Areas Are Inadequate, Unrepresentative, and at Risk.” PLoS Biology 12, no. 6 (17 June 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavridis, James. “Lessons from the White Continent.” Foreign Policy, February 23, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Richard. “The Arctic’s Big Year—Save It Now or Be Sorry Later.” Los Angeles Times, March 17, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, Suzette V. “Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.” In Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, edited by Armin von Bogdandy and Rüdiger Wolfrum, 131–168. Vol. 14. Leiden: Brill 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Editorial Board. “Giving Up on Antarctica.” The New York Times, September 16, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchetti, Simone, and Peder Roberts, eds. The Surveillance Imperative: Geosciences During the Cold War and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Submissions, Through the Secretary-General of the United Nations, to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, pursuant to Article 76, Paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_submissions.htm.

  • van der Watt, Lize-Marié. “Return to Gondwanaland: South Africa, Antarctica, Minerals and Apartheid.” The Polar Journal 3, no. 1 (1 June 2013): 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Watt, Lize-Marié, Peder Roberts, and Julia Lajus. “Institutions and the Changing Nature of Arctic Research During the Early Cold War.” In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Watt, Susanna M.E. “Out in the Cold: Science and the Environment in South Africa’s Involvement in the Sub-Antarctic and Antarctic in the Twentieth Century.” PhD thesis, University of Stellenbosch, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, Njord. “The EU and the Arctic: European Foreign Policy in the Making.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics 3, no. 1 (2012): 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Lize-Marié van der Watt & Peder Roberts

Authors
  1. Lize-Marié van der Watt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peder Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Nina Wormbs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van der Watt, LM., Roberts, P. (2018). Voicing Bipolar Futures: The Antarctic Treaty System and Arctic Governance in Historical Perspective. In: Wormbs, N. (eds) Competing Arctic Futures. Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91617-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91617-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91616-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91617-0

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation