Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beckett's Intuitive Spectator
  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces key concepts that will be employed throughout the subsequent chapters. Situated in the intersection between the concepts of habit and intuition, this monograph is divided into four sections. Section 1.1 Habit clarifies the concept of Habit in Beckett’s writings. Section 1.2 Intuition defines Intuition as we consider its opposition to the concept of Habit established in the first section. Section 1.3 Disjunction explains how a sense of disjunction in Beckett’s characters and audiences is the result of the tension between Habit and Intuition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Samuel Beckett, Not I, Footfalls , Rockaby. Directed by Walter Asmus, performance by Lisa Dwan, 12 Feb. 2014. Royal Court Theatre, London.

  2. 2.

    S. E. Gontarski, “The Business of Being Beckett: Beckett’s Reception in the USA,” in The International Reception of Samuel Beckett, edited by Mark Nixon and Matthew Feldman (London: Continuum, 2009), 26.

  3. 3.

    Simon Critchley, Very Little... Almost Nothing (London: Routledge, 2004), 151.

  4. 4.

    Ibid., 180.

  5. 5.

    Linda Ben-Zvi, “Beckett, McLuhan, and Television: The Medium, the Message, and ‘the Mess’,” in Beckett at 100: Revolving It All, edited by Linda Ben-Zvi and Angela Moorjani (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 280–1.

  6. 6.

    Jonathan Bignell, Beckett on Screen: The Television Plays (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2009), 159.

  7. 7.

    Chris Ackerley. “Beckett on Screen: The Television Plays (Review).” Modern Drama 54, no. 3 (2011): 384, accessed May 15, 2014, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/455883

  8. 8.

    Wolfgang Iser, “Do I write for an audience?” PMLA 115, no. 3 (May, 2000): 314, accessed May 20, 2016, http://www.jstor.org/stable/463451. For more on Iser’s Reader Response Theory, please see The implied reader: patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1974); The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, c1978); The fictive and the imaginary: charting literary anthropology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, c1993).

  9. 9.

    Henri Bergson, Time and Freewill: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, trans. F. L. Pogson , 3rd edn (London: G. Allen, 1913); Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. J. M. D. Meiklejohn (New York: Prometheus Books, 1990).

  10. 10.

    Bergson , The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans . R. Ashley Audra and Cloudesley Brereton (London: Macmillan and Co, 1935), 98.

  11. 11.

    Time and Freewill, p. 127.

  12. 12.

    Steven Connor, “Slow Going.” (presentation, Critical Beckett Conference, University of Birmingham, September 26, 1998). http://www.stevenconnor.com/slow.htm; Stephen Barker, “Qu’est-ce que c’est d’après in Beckettian time,” in Beckett after Beckett, ed. S. E. Gontarski and Anthony Uhlmann (Tallahassee: Florida University Press, 2006), 98–115; Anthony Uhlmann, Beckett and the Philosophical Image (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006); S. E. Gontarski, “Recovering Beckett’s Bergsonism,” in Beckett at 100: Revolving it all, ed. Linda Ben-Zvi and Angela Moorjani (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 93–106.

  13. 13.

    Samuel Beckett, Proust , in The Grove Centenary Edition: Poems, Short Fiction, and Criticism of Samuel Beckett, ed. Paul Auster, Vol. 4, 1st ed. (New York: Grove Press, 2006), 515.

  14. 14.

    Ulrika Maude, “Beckett and the Laws of Habit,” Modernism/modernity 18, no. 4 (November 2011): 820, accessed July 24, 2014, http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modernism-modernity/v018/18.4.maude.html

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Bergson , An Introduction to Metaphysics , trans. T. E. Hulme (London: Macmillan and Co Limited, 1913), 71.

  18. 18.

    Ibid.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 9.

  20. 20.

    Michael R. Kelly, “Introduction: Bergson’s Phenomenological Reception: the Spirit of a Dialogue of Self-Resistance,” in Bergson and Phenomenology, ed. Michael R. Kelly (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 5.

  21. 21.

    See Manfred Milz, “Echoes of Bergsonian Vitalism in Samuel Beckett’s Early Works,” Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 19, no. 1 (2008): 143–54; Graley Herren, Samuel Beckett’s Plays on Film and Television (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); Colin Gardner , Beckett, Deleuze and the Televisual Event: Peephole Art (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).

  22. 22.

    Gontarski, 98.

  23. 23.

    James Knowlson, Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 1996), 124.

  24. 24.

    Quoted in Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Gontarski, 104.

  26. 26.

    Connor, “Slow going”; Kelly, 5.

  27. 27.

    See Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, “Kinesthetic memory: Further critical reflections and constructive analyses” in Body, Memory, Metaphor and Movement, ed. Sabine C. Koch et al. (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 2012), 43- 72 (57 n 8), and Gary Gutting, “Bergson and Merleau-Ponty on Experience and Science,” in Bergson and Phenomenology, ed. Michael R. Kelly (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 63–77; Henri Bergson, Matter and Memory, trans. N. M. Paul and W. S. Palmer, 1912 Macmillan ed. (New York: Dover Publications, 2004), 137–8.

  28. 28.

    See Stanton B. Garner Jr., “‘Still Living Flesh’: Beckett , Merleau-Ponty, and the Phenomenological Body,” Theatre Journal 45, no.4 (December 1993): 443–60, accessed June 15, 2014, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3209015; Anna McMullan, Theatre on Trial (London and New York: Routledge, 1993); Ulrika Maude, “‘Material of a Strictly Peculiar Order’: Beckett, Merleau-Ponty and Perception,” Beckett and Phenomenology, ed. Ulrika Maude and Matthew Feldman (London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009); Trish McTighe, The Haptic Aesthetic in Samuel Beckett’s Drama (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

  29. 29.

    Ian S. Miller and Kay Souter, Beckett and Bion: The (Im)Patient Voice in Psychotherapy and Literature (London: Karnac Books, 2013), 91.

  30. 30.

    Ibid.

  31. 31.

    See, for example, Adam Piette, “Beckett, Early Neuropsychology and Memory Loss: Beckett’s Reading of Clarapede, Janet and Korsakoff,” in Beckett in the 1990s: 2nd International Beckett Symposium: Selected Papers (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993), 41–8, Peter Fifield, “Beckett, Cotard’s Syndrome and the Narrative Patient,” Journal of Beckett Studies 17, no. 1–2 (2008): 169–86, accessed July 14, 2014, http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/E0309520709000120

  32. 32.

    At this point, it is worth noting that the focus of this book is on the entrapping structure of habit instead of the complex mechanisms of habit formation that have been studied by theorists such as sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, and political theorist Yannis Stavrakakis. Nevertheless, Bourdieu’s concept of the habitus and Stavrakakis’s work on the relation between consumerist behavior and capitalism will be touched upon briefly in Chaps. 2 and 5, respectively.

Bibliography

  • Ackerley, Chris. 2011. Beckett on Screen: The Television Plays (Review). Modern Drama 54(3): 383–385. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/455883. Accessed 15 May 2014.

  • Barker, Stephen. 2006. Qu’est-ce que c’est d’après in Beckettian Time. In Beckett After Beckett, ed. S.E. Gontarski and Anthony Uhlmann, 98–115. Tallahassee: Florida University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2006. Proust. In The Grove Centenary Edition: Poems, Short Fiction, and Criticism of Samuel Beckett, ed. Paul Auster, vol. 4, 1st ed., 511–554. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, Linda. 2008. Beckett, McLuhan, and Television: The Medium, the Message, and ‘the Mess’. In Beckett at 100: Revolving It All, ed. Linda Ben-Zvi and Angela Moorjani, 271–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. 1913a. Time and Freewill: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, 3rd ed. Trans. F. L. Pogson. London: G. Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1913b. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. T. E. Hulme. London: Macmillan and Co. Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1935. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Trans. R. Ashley Audra and Cloudesley Brereton. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignell, Jonathan. 2009. Beckett on Screen: The Television Plays. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, Steven. 1998. Slow Going. Presentation at Critical Beckett Conference, University of Birmingham, September 26. http://www.stevenconnor.com/slow.htm

  • Critchley, Simon. 2004. Very Little... Almost Nothing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gontarski, S.E. 2008. Recovering Beckett’s Bergsonism. In Beckett at 100: Revolving It All, ed. Linda Ben-Zvi and Angela Moorjani, 93–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Business of Being Beckett: Beckett’s Reception in the USA. In The International Reception of Samuel Beckett, ed. Mark Nixon and Matthew Feldman, 24–39. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfgang. 2000. Do I Write for an Audience? PMLA 115(3): 310–314. http://www.jstor.org/stable/463451. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1990. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. J. M. D. Meiklejohn. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Michael R. 2010. Introduction: Bergson’s Phenomenological Reception: The Spirit of a Dialogue of Self-Resistance. In Bergson and Phenomenology, ed. Michael R. Kelly, 1–21. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlson, James. 1996. Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett, 124. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maude, Ulrika. 2011. Beckett and the Laws of Habit. Modernism/Modernity 18(4): 814–821. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modernism-modernity/v018/18.4.maude.html. Accessed 24 July 2014.

  • Miller, Ian S., and Kay Souter. 2013. Beckett and Bion: The (Im)Patient Voice in Psychotherapy and Literature. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, Anthony. 2006. Samuel Beckett and the Philosophical Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chiang, M. (2018). Introduction. In: Beckett's Intuitive Spectator. New Interpretations of Beckett in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91518-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics