Abstract
This chapter explores the formation of a digital intimate public via the actions of readers in relating to texts. Drawing on the work of Michael Warner (Public Culture 14:49–50, 2002), I resituate reading and the digital literacy required as central to social participation in digital publics. Following the insights of Louise Rosenblatt (The Reader, the Text, the Poem, Southern Illinois, London, 1978), I suggest that reading in the WSWCM public is an imaginative social act, in which readers co-construct texts through ‘girlfriend’ knowledges derived from mediated and social cultures of femininity. I explain how Tumblr’s architectures blur the distinctions between reading and blogging, inviting a sameness based on shared imaginaries, knowledges and literacies that are conducive to public formation. Particularly due to the GIF and caption format of the texts, a high degree of reader involvement and knowledge is required. At the same time, competencies in classification are required as part of this digital literacy. Reading involves a ‘database logic’ (Manovich in The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001) in making meaning out of GIFs, sorting, distilling and instrumentalising situations, bodies and meanings in ways that often assume a disconnection from social and historical contexts. This classificatory competency departs from a presumed location of whiteness and middle class membership, in this public, meaning that not all readers can belong in the same way.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Andrejevic, Mark, Alison Hearn, and Helen Kennedy. 2015. “Cultural Studies of Data Mining: Introduction.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5): 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577395.
Ang, Ien. 1985. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Translated by Della Couling. London and New York: Methuen & Co.
Ash, James. 2015. “Sensation, Networks and the GIF: Toward an Allotropic Account of Affect.” In Networked Affect, edited by Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit, 119–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2012. Authentic TM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.
Beech, Jennifer. 2017. “Facebook and Absent-Present Rhetorics of Whiteness.” In Rhetorics of Whiteness: Postracial Hauntings in Popular Culture, Social Media, and Education, edited by Tammie M. Kennedy, Joyce Irene Middleton, and Krista Ratcliffe, 132–144. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Beer, David. 2014. Popular Culture and New Media: The Politics of Circulation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benioff, David, and D.B. Weiss. 2011. Game of Thrones. United States: HBO Enterprises.
Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
Burgess, Jean. 2011. “User-Created Content and Everyday Cultural Practice: Lessons from YouTube.” In Television as Digital Media, edited by James Bennett and Niki Strange, 311–331. Durham: Duke University Press.
Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, Digital Media and Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Casserly, Meghan. 2012. “#WhatShouldWeCallMe Revealed: The 24-Year Old Law Students Behind the New Tumblr Darling.” Last Modified March 29. http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/03/29/whatshouldwecallme-revealed-24-year-old-law-students-tumblr-darling/. Accessed March 25.
Cho, Alexander. 2011. “Queer Tumblrs, Networked Counterpublics.” Conference Papers—International Communication Association, 1–37.
Cho, Alexander. 2015. “Queer Reverb: Tumblr, Affect, Time.” In Networked Affect, edited by Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit, 43–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Choi, Grace Y., and Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz. 2017. “Giving a New Makeover to STEAM: Establishing YouTube Beauty Gurus as Digital Literacy Educators Through Messages and Effects on Viewers.” Computers in Human Behavior 73: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.034.
Collins, James, and Richard K. Blot. 2003. Literacy and Literacies: Texts, Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, Margaret, and Ngaire Naffine. 2001. Are Persons Property? Legal Debates About Property and Personality. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Dobson, Amy Shields. 2011. “Hetero-Sexy Representation by Young Women on MySpace: The Politics of Performing an ‘Objectified’ Self.” Outskirts: Feminisms Along the Edge 25. Accessed June 18, 2013.
Fink, Marty, and Quinn Miller. 2014. “Trans Media Moments: Tumblr, 2011–2013.” Television & New Media 15 (7): 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476413505002.
Fuchs, Christian. 2015. Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Gee, James Paul. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hammer, Jessica. 2007. “Agency and Authority in Role-Playing ‘Texts’.” In A New Literacies Sampler, edited by Michelle Knobel and Colin Lankshear, 67–94. New York: Peter Lang.
Hart, Matt. 2015. “Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study.” Young 23 (3): 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308815577878.
Isin, Engin, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2015. Being Digital Citizens. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Karolides, Nicholas J. 1991. Reader Response in the Classroom: Evoking and Interpreting Meaning in Literature. New York: Longman.
Kennedy, Tammie M., Joyce Irene Middleton, and Krista Ratcliffe. 2005. “The Matter of Whiteness: Or, Why Whiteness Studies Is Important to Rhetoric and Composition Studies.” Rhetoric Review 24 (4): 359–373.
Lentin, Alana, and Justine Humphry. 2016. “Antiracism Apps: Framing Understandings and Approaches to Antiracism Education and Intervention.” Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1240824.
Lessig, Lawrence. 2008. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: The Penguin Press.
Livingstone, Sonia. 2008. “Engaging With Media—A Matter of Literacy?” Communication, Culture & Critique 1 (1): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00006.x.
Locke, Terry. 2005. “Louise Rosenblatt: Thanks for the Memory.” The English Journal 94 (5): 17–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/30047336.
Mailloux, Steven. 2005. “In Memoriam: Louise M. Rosenblatt, 1904–2005.” PMLA 120 (3): 886–887.
Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.
McRobbie, Angela. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
Miller, Vincent. 2008. “New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (4): 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856508094659.
Miltner, Kate, and Tim Highfield. 2017. “Never Gonna GIF You Up: Analyzing the Cultural Significance of the Animated GIF.” Social Media + Society 3 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117725223.
Nakamura, Lisa. 2008. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Nakamura, Lisa. 2014. “‘I WILL DO EVERYthing That Am Asked’: Scambaiting, Digital Show-Space, and the Racial Violence of Social Media.” Journal of Visual Culture 13 (3): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914546845.
Ortega, Mariana. 2006. “Being Lovingly, Knowingly Ignorant: White Feminism and Women of Color.” Hypatia 21 (3): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01113.x.
Pantaleo, Sylvia. 2013. “Revisiting Rosenblatt’s Aesthetic Response Through The Arrival.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 36: 125–134.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2014. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Radway, Janice. 1984. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Rambukkana, Nathan. 2016. “From #RaceFail to #Ferguson: The Digital Intimacies of Race- Activist Hashtag Publics.” In Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, edited by Nathan Rambukkana, 29–46. New York: Peter Lang.
Rault, Jasmine. 2017. “White Noise, White Affects: Filtering the Sameness of Queer Suffering.” Feminist Media Studies 17 (4): 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1326557.
Renninger, Bryce. 2015. “Where I can be Myself … Where I can Speak my Mind”: Networked Counterpublics in a Polymedia Environment. New Media & Society 17 (9): 1513–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481453009.
Rheingold, Howard. 2012. Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’.” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673.
Rosenblatt, Louise M. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem. London: Southern Illinois University Press.
Ross, Thomas. 1997. “Innocence and Affirmative Action.” In Critical White Studies, 27–32. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sanders, April. 2012. “Rosenblatt’s Presence in the New Literacies Research.” Talking Points 24 (1): 2–6.
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Siles, Ignacio. 2012. “Web Technologies of the Self: The Arising of the ‘Blogger’ Identity.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01581.x.
Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2013. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. London: Routledge.
Stacey, Jackie. 1994. Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London: Routledge.
Street, Brian V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strle, Danielle. 2013. “In Conversation with Danielle Strle of Tumblr.” Last Modified September 20. http://library.fora.tv/2013/09/20/In_Conversation_with_Danielle_Strle_of_Tumblr. Accessed August 10.
Sundén, Jenny. 2003. Material Virtualities. New York: Peter Lang.
Tiidenberg, Katrin, and Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2015. “Selfies, Image and the Re-making of the Body.” Body and Society 21(4): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x15592465.
van Dijck, José. 2015. “After Connectivity: The Era of Connectication.” Social Media + Society 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578873.
van Doorn, Niels, Liesbet van Zoonen, and Sally Wyatt. 2007. “Writing from Experience: Presentations of Gender Identity on Weblogs.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 14 (2): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807075819.
van Zoonen, Liesbet. 1994. Feminist Media Studies, the Media, Culture & Society Series. London: Sage.
Warner, Michael. 2002. “Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14 (1): 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49.
White, Michele. 2006. The Body and the Screen: Theories of Internet Spectatorship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, Raymond. 1961. The Long Revolution. London: Chatto & Windus.
Winch, Alison. 2013. Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kanai, A. (2019). The Classificatory Reader: Relating to Others Through Digital Texts. In: Gender and Relatability in Digital Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91515-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91515-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91514-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91515-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)