Skip to main content

How to Integrate Economic, Social, and Political Theory: Revise the Rationality Principle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Impact of Critical Rationalism
  • 382 Accesses

Abstract

Economic research is often isolated from social and political deliberations. Politicians put distinct results together in ad hoc ways. This state of affairs is explained as a result of equating rationality with coherence, system, and justification; the rationality principle, according to which social facts are to be explained as the result of coherent and/or justified plans of individuals, is singled out as the prime source of the isolation. A revised version is proposed which dispenses with the need for justification and/or coherence for (partially) rational action of individuals. Partially rational actions are attempts to solve problems within given institutional contexts; individual rationality is a social activity whose value depends on the quality of social standards which individuals use to guide their thought. This revision removes barriers between economic, social, and political theories, without blocking social scientific explanation. Indeed, it opens up possibilities now blocked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1960. Methodological Individualism. British Journal of Sociology 11: 214–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975a. Institutional Individualism. British Journal of Sociology 26: 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975b. Methodological Individualism and Institutional Individualism. In Rationality: The Critical View, ed. Joseph Agassi and Ian Jarvie, 119–150. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Neo-Classical Economics as 18th Century Theory of Man. Fundamenta Scientiae 9 (2/3): 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Bye-Bye, Weber. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (1): 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Knowledge Personal or Social. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4): 522–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Liberal Nationalism for Israel. Jerusalem: Gefen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Hans. 1972a. Ökonomische Ideologie und politische Theorie. Göttingen: Verlag Otto Schwartz & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972b. Konstruktion und Kritik. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Kritische Vernunft und menschlichen Praxis. Stuttgart: Philip Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Traktat über Rationale Praxis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Freiheit und Ordnung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Marktsoziologie und Entscheidungslogik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Lawrence. 2003. The Foundation of Economic Methodology: A Popperian Perspective. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1965. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Commons, John R. 1934. Institutional Economics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1974. Homo Sociologicus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1987. How Institutions Think. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. 1974. Legitimation of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Reply to Critics. In The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner, ed. John A. Hall and Ian C. Jarvie, 670–672. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Lawrence E., and Samuel P. Huntington, eds. 2000. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, Friedrich A. 1976. Economic Freedom and Representative Government. In Royal Society of Arts. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Stanford M. 2005. The Embedded Corporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettwark, Eugene, Merrill Silverstein, Vern L. Bengston, and Ynez Wilson Hirst. 2003. Theories About Families, Organizations, and Social Supports. In Global Aging and Challenges to Families, ed. Vern L. Bengston and Ariela Lowenstein, 27–53. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1961. The Economic Growth of the United States, 1790 to 1860. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Comments. In The Economic Role of the State, ed. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 107–116. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. The Open Society and Its Enemies [1945]. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. The Rationality Principle. In Popper Selections, ed. David Miller, 357ff. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, Jeremy. 1996. Hayek and After: Hayekian Liberalism as a Research Program. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1994. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. The Economic Role of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, Viktor. 2002. Rational Choice vs. Program-Based Behavior. Rationality and Society 14: 7–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, Its Deficiency and Its Evolutionary Alternative. Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein. 1949. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walrus, Léon. 1965. Elements of Pure Economics: Or the Theory of Social Wealth. Translated by William Jaffé. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 1979. Ernest Gellner: A Wittgensteinian Rationalist. Philosophica 8 (4): 741–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. How Do Institutions Steer Events? An Inquiry into the Limits and Possibilities of Rational Thought and Action. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Philosophical Anthropology Can Help Social Scientists Learn from Empirical Tests. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 37 (3): 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Popper and Sen on Rationality and Economics: Two (Independent) Wrong Turns Can Be Remedied with the Same Program. In Rethinking Popper, ed. Zuzana Parusniková and Robert Cohen, 369–378. Netherland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. New Social Tasks for Cognitive Psychology; or, New Cognitive Tasks for Social Psychology. The American Journal of Psychology 127 (4): 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Critical Rationalists Much Too Narrow Contribution to Der Positivismusstreit: Alternative Political Theories Which Conform to Fallibilist, Individualist Methodologies Were Needed Then and Are Needed Today. Journal for Classical Sociology 15: 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1986. Economic Organization: Firms, Markets, and Policy Control. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Industrial Organization. Hants, Broomfield, and Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. The Mechanisms of Government. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg, 77–107. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wettersten, J. (2019). How to Integrate Economic, Social, and Political Theory: Revise the Rationality Principle. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics