Skip to main content

Clinical Assessment and Differential Diagnosis of Fecal Incontinence and Its Severity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Fecal Incontinence for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Abstract

Assessment and diagnosis of fecal incontinence by the advanced practice nurse involve critical thinking in the process of differential diagnosis of fecal incontinence. Fecal incontinence is a stigmatized condition that requires the advanced practice nurse to approach the patient from a perspective of cultural competence, demonstrating respect and acknowledgment of the sensitive nature of the concern. History taking starts with symptom assessment, as well as gathering a comprehensive health history. The use of a standardized symptom assessment instrument, particularly one that includes quality of life, can be helpful. The physical examination includes abdominal examination, vaginal examination in women, assessment of pelvic muscles in both women and men, and rectal examination. Arriving at the differential diagnosis must take into account the data gathered in the history and physical exam, as well as consideration of the breadth of potential causes, including red flag symptoms and signs. Laboratory investigations for specific conditions that may contribute to fecal incontinence may include tests for suspected hypo- and hyperthyroidism, diabetes, celiac disease, colorectal cancer screening, and infection. Diagnostic imaging to further evaluate fecal incontinence may be ordered by the advanced practice nurse or be accessed through referral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jarvis C. Physical examination and health assessment. Elsevier Health Sciences: St. Louis; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stanhope M, Lancaster J. Public health nursing: population-centered health care in the community. 8th ed. Elsevier Mosby: Maryland Heights, MO; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elstad EA, Taubenberger SP, Botelho EM, Tennstedt SL. Beyond incontinence: the stigma of other urinary symptoms. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(11):2460–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. The Simon Foundation for Continence. First International Conference on Stigma in Healthcare. http://simonfoundation.org/1st-conference-stigma-healthcare/.

  5. Bliss DZ, Mimura T, Berghmans B, Bharucha A, Chiarioni G, Emmanuel A, et al. Assessment and conservative management of faecal incontinence and quality of life in adults. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 6th ed. Bristol: International Continence Society; 2017. p. 1993–2085.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daines J, Baumann L, Scheibel P. Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care. 4th ed. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier Mosby; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rhoads J, Petersen SW. Advanced health assessment and diagnostic reasoning. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nevler A. The epidemiology of anal incontinence and symptom severity scoring. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014;2(2):79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KNL, Donovan JL. A patient-centered approach to developing a comprehensive symptom and quality of life assessment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(1):82–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KN, Abrams P, Donovan JL. Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-completed questionnaire for evaluating anal incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life: the ICIQ-B. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(10):1235–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sansoni J, Hawthorne G, Fleming G, Marosszeky N. The revised faecal incontinence scale: a clinical validation of a new, short measure for assessment and outcomes evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):652–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: a quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:9–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44(1):77–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bliss DZ, Larson SJ, Burr JK, Savik K. Reliability of a stool consistency classification system. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2001;28(6):305–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haylen B, Maher C, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Withagen M. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:137–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riss P, Koch M. Evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse. In: Principles and practice of urogynaecology. New Delhi: Springer India; 2015. p. 107–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laycock J. Pelvic muscle exercises: physiotherapy for the pelvic floor. Urol Nurs. 1994;14:136–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association Medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Orkin BA, Sinykin SB, Lloyd PC. The digital rectal examination scoring system (DRESS). Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1656–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cannon JA. Evaluation, diagnosis, and medical management of rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(01):016–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart DB Sr, Gaertner W, Glasgow S, Migaly J, Feingold D, Steele SR. Clinical practice guideline for the management of anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(1):7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Birnbaum E, editor. Surgical anatomy of the colon, rectum, and anus. Cham: Springer International; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Theys T, Kho KH. The saddle and the horse’s tail: Cauda equina syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(7):914–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein A, Pinto-Powell R. Introductory clinical reasoning curriculum. MedEdPortal. 2016.; https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10370

  27. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(594):e29–37. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X616346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnan B, Babu S, Walker J, Walker AB, Pappachan JM. Gastrointestinal complications of diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2013;4(3):51–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):656–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamada T, Inadomi J, Bhattacharya R, Dominitz J, Hwang J. Yamada’s handbook of gastroenterology. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen F. Hunter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hunter, K.F., Dickinson, T., Haggar, V. (2018). Clinical Assessment and Differential Diagnosis of Fecal Incontinence and Its Severity. In: Bliss, D. (eds) Management of Fecal Incontinence for the Advanced Practice Nurse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90704-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90704-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90703-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90704-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics