Abstract
This chapter presents different national government structures and regulative frameworks, as well as the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) international initiatives towards current and future risks of human health related to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and analyzes how those structures and frameworks influence the use of antibiotics in different countries. This chapter zooms in on Denmark as an interesting case for two reasons: relatively strong regulations and governance both in the human and the veterinarian sectors and a relatively low use of antibiotics both on humans and animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarestrup, F. M. (1999). Association between the consumption of antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry and the occurrence of resistant bacteria among food animals. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 12, 279–285.
Aulakh, P. S., & Gencturk, E. F. (2000). International principal–agent relationships: Control, governance and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 521–538.
DANMAP. (2016). DANMAP (2015)—Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.danmap.org/Downloads/Reports.aspx
Elgie, R. (2002). The politics of the European Central Bank: Principal-agent theory and the democratic deficit. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110120219
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2014. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net), Stockholm.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, European Food Safety Authority, European Medicines Agency. (2015). ECDC/EFSA/EMA first joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals: Joint Interagency Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance Analysis (JIACRA). Report of EFSA Journal, 13, 4006. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4006
European Commission. (2015). ECDC/EFSA/EMA first joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals. European Food Safety Authority.
European Medicines Agency. (2014). Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 26 EU/EEA countries in 2012. Fourth ESVAC report, London.
Eurostat. (2014). Pig farming in the European Union: Considerable variations from one Member State to another. Statistics in Focus 15/2014.
Gelband, H., Miller-Petrie, M., Pant, S., Gandra, S., Levinson, J., White, A., & Laxminarayan, R. (2015). The state of the world’s antibiotics 2015. Washington, DC: The Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy.
OECD. (2015). Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicator. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Stivers, T. (2007). Prescribing under pressure: Parent-physician conversations and antibiotics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
WHO. (2017). Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 5th revision. Geneva: WHO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jensen, C.S. (2019). Governing the Consumption of Antimicrobials: The Danish Model for Using Antimicrobials in a Comparative Perspective. In: Jensen, C.S., Nielsen, S.B., Fynbo, L. (eds) Risking Antimicrobial Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90656-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90656-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90655-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90656-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)