Skip to main content

Lifecycle Management of Biotherapeutic Dosage Forms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Protein Product Development

Part of the book series: AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series ((AAPS,volume 38))

  • 3557 Accesses

Abstract

Lifecycle management of biotherapeutic dosage forms has become an increasingly important strategy for providing patients with enhanced convenience during storage and administration as well as providing companies with an opportunity to compete in an increasingly crowded marketplace. Often, lifecycle management is first considered after a product becomes available for commercial distribution. This approach can cause delays in innovation and result in a loss of opportunity to serve patients and remain competitive. A thoughtful approach to lifecycle management of dosage forms should begin in early product design, providing a framework for continuous improvement and the ability to take advantage of cumulative learning of both the specific compound as well as the therapeutic area and patients’ needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline—Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2); Step 4 Version August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guidance for Industry—Q9 Quality Risk management; United States FDA June 2006 ICH.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guidance for Industry—Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System; United States FDA April 2009 ICH.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline—Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances (Chemical Entities and Biotechnological/Biological Entities) Q11; Step 4 Version 01 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical Development Success Rates 2006–2015—BIO, Biomedtracker, Amplion (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evens RP. Pharma success in product development—does biotechnology change the paradigm in product development and attrition. AAPS J. 2016;18:281–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warne NW. Development of high concentration protein biopharmaceuticals: the use of platform approaches in formulation development. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;78:208–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rathore AS, Reason AJ, Weiskopf A. Defining critical quality attributes for monoclonal antibody therapeutic products. BioPharm Int. 2014; 27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Current Good Manufacturing Practice Requirements for Combination Products—Draft Guidance published January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallo A. A refresher on net present value. Harvard Bus Rev. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen JT. Improvement of patient convenience in treatment with growth hormone. J Pediatr Endocrinol. 1994;7:175–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guidance for Industry and FDA Review Staff: Target Product Profile—A Strategic Development Process Tool—Draft Guidance published March 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bolge SC, Goren A, Tandon N. Reasons for discontinuation of subcutaneous biologic therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a patient perspective. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:121–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta A, Hindmarsh PC. The use of somatropin (recombinant growth hormone) in children of short stature. Pediatr Drugs. 2002;4:37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goeddel DV, et al. Direct expression in Escherichia coli of a DNA sequence coding for human growth hormone. Nature. 1979;281:544–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Product sales for hGH and FVIII products were obtained from annual financial reports and converted to USD using the yearly average exchange rate.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hemophilia: From Plasma to Recombinant Factors. American Society of Hematology. In: 50 years in hematology: research that revolutionized patient care, www.hematology.org. 2008.

  18. Product histories were obtained from product websites, prescribing information, press releases, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration website, and Pharma Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  19. PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Brief Primer. Merle Myerson; Medscape 28 March 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Delivering on the Potential of Biosimilar Medicines; IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics March 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Warne, N., Balthazor, B., Parr, W. (2018). Lifecycle Management of Biotherapeutic Dosage Forms. In: Warne, N., Mahler, HC. (eds) Challenges in Protein Product Development. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90603-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics