Skip to main content

Effects of Being Located in a Cluster on Economic Actors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Agglomeration and Firm Performance

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 609 Accesses

Abstract

The greatest assets of clusters are their positive external effects or knowledge spillovers generated through the colocation of firms of the same or similar industries. These externalities can have a positive influence on various performance indicators, not only for firms inside clusters but for the entire region in which clusters are embedded as well. However, several empirical studies show that these positive results do not always manifest themselves. Moderating effects such as industry- or country-specific as well as cluster- and firm-specific characteristics play important roles. Therefore, the goal of this chapter is to provide an overview on the effects both inside and outside of clusters identified in empirical studies, thereby investigating the following indicators: innovativeness, productivity, employment growth and wage level, entrepreneurship, survival probability and growth of start-ups as well as resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed overview, see, for example, McCann and Folta (2008) and Sedita et al. (2012).

  2. 2.

    The authors however recognize that there also is a vast amount of case studies dealing with the effects of being located in a cluster (e.g. Saxenian 1994).

  3. 3.

    Clusters that benefited from the public support “poles de competitivité”, which started in 2005 (Martin et al. 2014).

References

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in cluster innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basant, R., Chandra, P., & Upadhyayula, R. (2011). Knowledge flows and capability building in the Indian IT sector: A comparative analysis of cluster and non-cluster locations. Indian Institute of Management Banglador, Working Paper No. 2011-10-02

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, C., & Breschi, S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowiecki, K. J. (2013). Geographic clustering and productivity: An instrumental variable approach for classical composers. Journal of Urban Economics, 73(1), 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., Burgees J., Festing M., Royer S., & Steffen, C. (2007). The value adding web – A conceptual framework of competitive advantage realisation in clusters. WP n. 27 Berlin. ESCt-EAP Euröpish Wirtshaft Hochschule Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G. (2008). Spatial agglomeration, technological innovations, and firm productivity: Evidence from Italian industrial districts. Growth and Change, 39(3), 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., Montresor, S., & Vittucci Marzetti, G. (2012). Firms’ death rate and spatial agglomeration. Evidence on the resilience of Italian local production systems. Rivista di Economica e statistica del territorio, 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., & Folta, T. (2000). Entrepreneurship and hightechnology clusters. In D. L. Sexton & H. Landström (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 348–367). Malden: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. CES Research Paper No. 10-31, Center for Economic Studies (CES), US Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. NBER Working Paper series, Working Paper 18250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Porter M. E., & Stern, S. (2015). Clusters and the great recession. DRUID 2015, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFI. (2015). Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und Technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expósito-Langa, M., Molina-Morales, F. X., & Tomás-Miquel, J.-V. (2015). Innovation in clusters: Exploration capacity, networking intensity and external resources. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(1), 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L. (2015). Do clusters encourage innovation? A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2008). On building clusters versus leveraging synergies in the design of innovation policy for developing economies. In U. Blien & G. Maier (Eds.), The economics of regional clusters: Networks, technology and policy (pp. 191–213). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festing, M., Royer, S., & Steffen, C. (2012). Unternehmenscluster schaffen Wettbewerbsvorteile - Eine Analyse des Uhrenclusters in Glashütte. Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation, 81(4), 264–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Baik, Y.-s. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (Eds.), Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems (pp. 38–57). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D., Heimer, T., Campen, A., Talmon-Gros, L., & Treperman, J. (2015). Cluster als Paradigma der Innovationspolitik - Eine erfolgreiche Anwendung von Theorie in der politischen Praxis? Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr, 13–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D., & Menzel, M.-P. (2003). Co-development of firm foundings and regional clusters. Diskussionspapiere der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Hannover. Hannover: Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D., & Sorenson, O. (2008). Geographic clustering in biotechnology: Social networks and firm foundings. In T. Brenner & H. Patzelt (Eds.), Handbook of bioentrepreneurship (pp. 35–51). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Cefis E. and Stam E. (2013). Industrial dynamics and clusters: A survey. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, Discussion Papers Series nr: 13-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2009). The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: When distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation. Journal of Econonmic Geography, 9(2), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervas-Oliver, J-L. and Sempere-Ripoll F. (2014). Agglomerations and firm performance: How does it work, who benefits and how much?. INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 2014-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketels, C., & Protsiv, S. (2013). Clusters and the new growth path for Europe. Work Package 301: MS47 “Research paper on the role of clusters for the new growth path”, Working Paper no. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J., Arikan, A. T., Van Oort, F., & Raspe, O. (2016). Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison. Environment and Planning A, 48(1), 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-Y. (2009). Do firms in clusters invest in R&D more intensively? Theory and evidence from multi-country data. Research Policy, 38(7), 1159–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzel, N. (2017). Does embeddedness in clusters enhance firm survival and growth? An establishment-level analysis using CORIS data. Regional Studies, 51(4), 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, G., & Trippl, M. (2012). Pitfalls and booby traps of cluster policy. SRE-Discussion Papers 2012/01. Vienna: WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2011). Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2008). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. Discussion Paper No. DP6858. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2014). Are clusters more resilient in crises? Evidence from French exporters in 2008-2009. Presented at the conference “The Factory Free Economy: What next for the 21st century” 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2008). Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 532–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2011). Performance differentials within geographic clusters. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, F., Huang, Q., Tsagdis, D., & Tüselmann, H. J. (2007). Is there evidence to support porter-type cluster policies? Regional Studies, 41(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Clusters, innovation and entrepreneurship. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 549–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D. L., & Brown, M. W. (2015). Who benefits from agglomeration? Regional Studies, 49(1), 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedita, S. R., Lazzeretti, L., & Caloffi, A. (2012). The birth and the rise of the cluster concept. DRUID 2012. CBS: Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12), 1175–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, G. M., Vinodrai, T., Gertler, M. S., & Wolfe, D. A. (2010). Do clusters make a difference? Defining and assessing their economic performance. Regional Studies, 44(6), 697–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(2), 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., & Lindqvist, G. (2010). The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics, 34(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel, M. (2015). ‘One for all and all for one’: Cluster, employment, and the global economic crisis. Evidence from the German mechanical engineering industry. Papers in Regional Science, 94(2), 273–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Fornahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fornahl, D., Grashof, N., Söllner, C. (2018). Effects of Being Located in a Cluster on Economic Actors. In: Belussi, F., Hervas-Oliver, JL. (eds) Agglomeration and Firm Performance. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90575-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics