Skip to main content

Cluster Advantage and Firm Performance: A Shift into the Future!

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agglomeration and Firm Performance

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 580 Accesses

Abstract

The spatial concentration or agglomeration of economic activity leads to the emergence of externalities in the form of collective resource pools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Marshall (1890), Arrow (1962) and Romer (1986) put forward a concept, which was later formalized by the seminal work of Glaeser et al. (1992) and became known as the Marshall-Arrow-Romer (MAR) mode.

References

  • Alcacer, J., & Chung, W. (2014). Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1749–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F., De Noni, I., & Orsi, L. (2018). Mapping inventors’ networks to trace knowledge flows among EU regions. In A. Isaksen et al. (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems—New avenues for regional innovation systems - theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F., Gottardi, G., & Rullani, E. (Eds.). (2003). The technological evolution of industrial districts. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F., & Hervàs-Oliver, J. L. (Eds.). (2017). Unfolding cluster evolution. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. (2009). Life cycle Vs multiple path dependency in industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Dirk Fornahl, D. (2011). Cluster evolution and a roadmap for future research. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1295–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: Productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6, 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W., & Kalnins, A. (2001). Agglomeration effects and performance: A test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 969–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Belussi, F. (2017). The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions. Research Policy, 47(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervás-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., Estelles-Miguel, S., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2017). Radical innovation in Marshallian industrial districts. Regional Studies, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervás-Oliver, J. L., et al. (2017). The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. Research Policy, 46(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Rojas Alvarado, R., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: Who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, 52(3), 338–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics: An introductory volume. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., & Marshall, M. P. (1920). The economics of industry. London: Macmillan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2011). Performance differentials within geographic clusters. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouder, R., & St. John, C. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographic clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1192–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12), 1175–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–19891. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Madhok, A., & Li, S. (2014). Agglomeration and clustering over the industry life cycle: Toward a dynamic model of geographic concentration. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/Smj.2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Professor Dr. Hervas-Oliver has received financial support from ECO-63645-R (MINECO/FEDER) from the Spanish Ministry of Economics, Industry and Competitiveness. Additionally, this work is part of the research project PRAT 2014 “Moving knowledge into action: exploring the micro-foundation of an innovation ecosystem”, funded by the University of Padova and headed by Prof. Dr. Silvia Rita Sedita. CPDA142857/14.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hervas-Oliver, JL., Belussi, F. (2018). Cluster Advantage and Firm Performance: A Shift into the Future!. In: Belussi, F., Hervas-Oliver, JL. (eds) Agglomeration and Firm Performance. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90575-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics