Skip to main content

Writing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bonn Handbook of Globality
  • 574 Accesses

Abstract

Writing is an only seemingly self-explanatory everyday term. In the ancient Egyptian culture, for example, no distinction was made between “writing” and “drawing/painting,” and we know this terminology similarly from the Greek culture. Exactly this terminological width was also practiced in the Mayan culture. If the substantial difference between writing and painting was not terminologically expressed, this could mean that in this cultural perspective, the emblematic was in focus as the common denominator. We can operate with the differentiation between writing in a narrower sense and writing in a broader sense. Specific to writing in a narrower sense is a certain phonetic dimension of coding. The meaning of the language contacts for the phonetization of the signs, and thus the development of writing in a narrower sense, is an example of the high culture-poetical meaning of cultural diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale, Lausanne: Payot, 1995 (original edition posthumously Lausanne: Payot, 1916).

  2. 2.

    Leonard Bloomfield, An Introduction to the Study of Language, London: H. Holt, 1935 (2nd edition); critical evaluation in Florian Coulmas, Writing: An introduction to their linguistic analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 (German original: Idem, Über Schrift, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1981).

  3. 3.

    Josef Vachek, Zum Problem der geschriebenen Sprache, in: Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 8/1939, pp. 94–104; Idem., Written Language, The Hague: Mouton, 1973; Idem./Philipp A. Lueldorf, Written Language Revisited, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1989; Jacques Derrida, Derrida, Writing and Difference, London: Routledge, 1978.

  4. 4.

    Konrad, Ehlich, Funktion und Struktur schriftlicher Kommunikation, in: Hartmut Günther/Otto Ludwig (eds.) Schrift und Schriftlichkeit/Writing and its Use. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung / An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research. Volume 1, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994, pp. 18–41; Idem., Textualität und Schriftlichkeit, in: Ludwig Morenz/Stefan Schorch (eds.), Was ist ein Text?, Alttestamentliche, ägyptologische und altorientalistische Perspektiven, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007, pp. 7–17.

  5. 5.

    Indeed there are of course still undeciphered or unsure deciphered writings on which we are not able to make precise statements.

  6. 6.

    The sometimes postulated old European writing (Harald Haarmann) is in any case a not yet deciphered system of signs that may only have a formal resemblance to writing in the strictest sense.

  7. 7.

    Overview in Nikolai Grube, Mittelamerikanische Schriften, in: Hartmut Günther/Otto Ludwig (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit/Writing and its Use. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung/An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research. Volume 1, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994, pp. 405–415.

  8. 8.

    Language contact can be named, for example, as a motivator for stronger phonetization of the signs in the Maya writing, see Søren Wichmann/ Albert Davletshin, Writing with an Accent: Phonology as a Marker of Ethnic Identity, in: Frauke Sache (ed.), Maya Ethnicity: The Construction of Ethnic Identity from the Preclassic to Modern Times. 9th European Maya Conference (Bonn, December 2004), in: Acta Mesoamerica 19/2006, pp. 99–106; this also applies to the sumeric script, see Jean-Jacques Glassner, Écrire à Sumer. L’invention du cuneiform, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2000.

Literature

  • Bloomfield, Leonard, An Introduction to the Study of Language, London: H.Holt, 1935 (2nd edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulmas, Florian, Writing: An introduction to their linguistic analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 (German original: Idem., Über Schrift, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference, London: Routledge, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Saussure, Ferdinand, Cours de linguistique générale, Lausanne: Payot, 1995 (original edition posthum Lausanne: Payot, 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, Konrad, Funktion und Struktur schriftlicher Kommunikation, in: Günther, Hartmut/Ludwig, Otto (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit/Writing and its Use. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung/An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research. Vol. 1, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994: 18–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, Konrad, Textualität und Schriftlichkeit, in: Morenz, Ludwig/Schorch, Stefan (eds.), Was ist ein Text? Alttestamentliche, ägyptologische und altorientalistische Perspektiven, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, Jean-Jacques, Écrire à Sumer. L’invention du cuneiform, Paris: Editions du Seuil, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, Nikolai, Mittelamerikanische Schriften, in: Günther, Hartmut/Ludwig, Otto (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit/Writing and its Use. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung/An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research.Vol. 1, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994: 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morenz, Ludwig, Bild-Buchstaben und symbolische Zeichen. Die Herausbildung der Schrift in der hohen Kultur Altägyptens, OBO (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis) 205, Fribourg: Academic Press/Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morenz, Ludwig, Kultur- und mediengeschichtliche Essays zu einer Archäologie der Schrift. Von den frühneolithischen Zeichensystemen bis zu den frühen Schriftsystemen in Ägypten und dem Vorderen Orient, THOT 4, Berlin: EBVerlag, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morenz, Ludwig/Schorch, Stefan (Hrsg.), Was ist ein Text? Alttestamentliche, ägyptologische und altorientalistische Perspektiven, Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachek, Josef, Zum Problem der geschriebenen Sprache, in: Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 8/1939: 94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachek, Josef, Written Language, The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachek, Josef/Luelsdorf, Philipp A., Written Language Revisited, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann, Søren/Davletshin, Albert, Writing with an Accent: Phonology as a Marker of Ethnic Identity, in: Sachse, Frauke (ed.), Maya Ethnicity: The Construction of Ethnic Identity from the Preclassic to Modern Times. 9th European Maya Conference (Bonn, December 2004), in: Acta Mesoamericana 19/2006: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morenz, L.D. (2019). Writing. In: Kühnhardt, L., Mayer, T. (eds) The Bonn Handbook of Globality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90377-4_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics