Skip to main content

World Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bonn Handbook of Globality

Abstract

The article starts with an overview of four core mechanisms in the formation of world society: Communication, migration, observation, and knowledge. The first three can be seen as dynamic factors bringing about and transferring variants in world society; (world) knowledge is a kind of storage for temporary results of these dynamic operations. In the second part, the argument looks at semantics, concepts and theories, and their accumulation over 2000 years which prepare the idea and structural realization of world society as the most extensive social system which includes all sociality into its purview. In the third part, we introduce the “Eigenstructures of world society,” self-reinforcing structures which prepare world society as they are the result of the emergence of this system. The argument presents six candidates for Eigenstructures: Functional differentiation, small world networks, formal organizations, epistemic communities, global interaction systems, and world events. They all demonstrate the unity of structure formation and self-description characteristic of world society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Niklas Luhmann, Kommunikation und Handlung, in: Idem, Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1984, pp. 191–240.

  2. 2.

    Donald T. Campbell, Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

  3. 3.

    Rudolf Stichweh, Selbstbeschreibung der Weltgesellschaft, in: Jörg Baberowski/Hartmut Kaelble/Jürgen Schriewer (eds.), Selbstbilder und Fremdbilder. Repräsentationen sozialer Ordnung im Wandel, Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 2008, pp. 21–53.

  4. 4.

    Manfred Koch, Weimaraner Weltbewohner. Zur Genese von Goethes Begriff ‚Weltliteraturʻ, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2002.

  5. 5.

    Albrecht Wirth, Der Weltverkehr, Frankfurt/Main: Rütten und Loening, 10906; Wilhelm Schwedler, Die Nachricht im Weltverkehr. Kritische Bemerkungen über das internationale Nachrichtenwesen vor und nach dem Weltkriege, Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte, 1922.

  6. 6.

    Christopher Clark, The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. London: Penguin Books, 2013.

  7. 7.

    This can be easily examined in looking for “World Society” in Google Ngram. There is a steep rise of usages around 1942; in German it is only in the 1960s that the word is used frequently, but there are some German usages around 1800.

  8. 8.

    Laura Maples McMullen, Building the World Society. A Handbook of International Relations, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1931.

  9. 9.

    Linden A. Mander, Foundations of Modern World Society, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1941.

  10. 10.

    Interesting political documents in which you find the concept of world society are the Berlin Program of the German Social Democratic party (SPD) from 1989 and the revised version adopted in Leipzig 1998 which was valid until 2007. In the Hamburg Program from 2007 “world society” has completely been replaced by “Globalization.” In none of the programs of the Christian Democratic Party (CDU), the word “world society” occurs. For the Social Democratic programs, it is characteristic that they emphasize that world society is already a facticity. They demand a democratic character of world society, remind that world society is not yet a peace order, and highlight the interdependence of world society and ecology, perhaps the most programmatic statement. This, too, is a good indicator for a global turn. Ecological problems more than many other problems can only be dealt with as world problems.

  11. 11.

    Peter Heintz, Die Weltgesellschaft im Spiegel von Ereignissen, Diessenhofen: Rüegger, 1982.

  12. 12.

    John W. Burton, World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

  13. 13.

    Immanuel Wallerstein,The Modern World-System. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Academic Press, 1974.

  14. 14.

    John W. Meyer, World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

  15. 15.

    Niklas Luhmann, Die Weltgesellschaft, in: Idem., Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft, Ppladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2009, pp. 51–71. Other authors could be added, for example, the legal scholar and sociologist from Groningen, Bart Landheer, On the Sociology of International Law and International Society, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.

  16. 16.

    Rudolf Stichweh, Funktionale Differenzierung der Weltgesellschaft, in: Gert Albert/Steffen Sigmund (eds.), Soziologische Theorie kontrovers, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2010, pp. 299–306.

  17. 17.

    David Easley/Jon Kleinberg, Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Reasoning about a Highly Connected World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

  18. 18.

    Ronald S. Burt, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.

  19. 19.

    Rudolf Stichweh, Wissensordnungen und Wissensproduktion im 21. Jahrhundert, in: Merkur 68. 4(2014), pp. 336–344.

  20. 20.

    Émile Durkheim, De la division du travail social. Paris: P.U.F. 1973 (original edition 1893).

  21. 21.

    Rudolf Stichweh, Zur Soziologie des Weltereignisses, Stefan Nacke/René Unkelbach/Tobias Werron (eds.), Weltereignisse: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008, pp. 17–40.

Literature

  • Burt, Ronald S., Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John W. World Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Christopher, The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914, London: Penguin Books, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile, De la division du travail social, Paris: P.U.F. 1973 (original edition 1893).

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, David/Kleinberg, Jon, Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, Peter. Die Weltgesellschaft im Spiegel von Ereignissen, Diessenhofen: Rüegger, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Manfred, Weimaraner Weltbewohner. Zur Genese von Goethes Begriff ‚Weltliteraturʻ, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landheer, Bart, On the Sociology of International Law and International Society, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas, Die Weltgesellschaft, in: Idem., Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1971, pp. 51–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas, Kommunikation und Handlung, in: Idem., Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1984, pp. 191–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, Linden A. Foundations of Modern World Society, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maples McMullen, Laura, Building the World Society: A Handbook of International Relations, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer, New York: Oxford Univerity Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwedler, Wilhelm, Die Nachricht im Weltverkehr. Kritische Bemerkungen über das internationale Nachrichtenwesen vor und nach dem Weltkriege, Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, Rudolf, Selbstbeschreibung der Weltgesellschaft, in: Baberowski, Jörg/Kaelble, Hartmut/Schriewer, Jürgen (eds.), Selbstbilder und Fremdbilder: Repräsentationen sozialer Ordnung im Wandel, Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 2008a, pp. 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, Rudolf, Zur Soziologie des Weltereignisses, in: Nacke, Stefan/Unkelbach, René/Werron, Tobias (eds.), Weltereignisse: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008b, pp. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, Rudolf, Funktionale Differenzierung der Weltgesellschaft, in: Albert, Gert/Sigmund, Steffen (eds.), Soziologische Theorie kontrovers, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2010, pp. 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, Rudolf, Wissensordnungen und Wissensproduktion im 21. Jahrhundert, in: Merkur 68.4(2014), pp. 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Albrecht, Der Weltverkehr, Frankfurt/Main: Rütten und Loening, 1906.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf Stichweh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stichweh, R. (2019). World Society. In: Kühnhardt, L., Mayer, T. (eds) The Bonn Handbook of Globality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90377-4_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics