Skip to main content

Will the Transhuman Future Be Good or Bad for Humanity?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

The central question that this chapter addresses is the following: Is transhumanism a threat, or a benefit, to the good human life? One can imagine any answer landing somewhere between two poles: a utopian view, which generally sees transhuman proposals as enhancements to human living that would lead to better lives and a better world; and a dystopian view, which sees these changes as fundamentally destructive of the good life. I show that one cannot view a transhuman future as simply either good or bad. One’s view must, instead, fall not between, but outside, these two poles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kurzweil , Ray, Transcendent Man.

  2. 2.

    Bostrom, Nick. “Transhumanist Values.”

  3. 3.

    These include “homo faber” (Arendt , The Human Condition); “homo ludens” (Huizinga , Homo Ludens ); “homo sentimentalis” (Halton, Bereft of Reason ); “homo socius” (Berger and Luckmann , The Social Construction of Reality); “homo domesticus” (Jensen, Endgame); “homo animalis” (Martin Heidegger, “Letter on Humanism,” in Heidegger , Basic Writings ); “homo religiosus” (Alister Hardy, as quoted by Rüdiger Vaas, “God, Gains, and Genes,” in Voland and Wulf Schiefenhövel, The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior); “homo poetica” (Becker , The Structure of Evil).

  4. 4.

    Genesis 1:28 (New Revised Standard Version).

  5. 5.

    Winner , Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” in The Whale and the Reactor.

  6. 6.

    I am adapting a term coined first by architectural theorist Ian McHarg , and later popularized by the ocean ecologist Daniel Pauly. McHarg , Design with Nature; Pauly, “Anecdotes and the Shifting Baseline Syndrome of Fisheries.”

  7. 7.

    By “nontrivial” I mean a notion of fairness that makes contact with the specifics of how any of the games are actually played. One could, of course, point out that all these sports share a common understanding of fairness as “sticking to the rules,” but this trivial sort of definition only serves to illustrate the point I am making: that the rules and procedures of gameplay are so distinct that no definition of “fairness” that applies to all these games will provide any useful knowledge about how to actually play any of the games fairly.

  8. 8.

    For a representative case of this argument, see Conrad Gessner, Mithridate. Mithridates.

  9. 9.

    Gramophone.

  10. 10.

    Ellen A. Wartella and Nancy Jennings, “Children and Computers: New Technology. Old Concerns.”

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    I use the term “generation” here in something less than the strict, literal sense .

  13. 13.

    It is worth noting that, for reasons to do with organizational structure, the Catholic Church has often fared better in maintaining a coherent conservative stance than the Protestant Churches have. This is, however, not to say that the conservative stance is a good one.

  14. 14.

    We can also acknowledge that there are some “core” values that are intentionally upheld across many generations and are therefore somewhat more resistant to long-term change. These do not seem to include technology-oriented values.

Bibliography

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Ernest. 1976. The Structure of Evil: An Essay on the Unification of the Science of Man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, Nick. 2005. Transhumanist Values. Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner, Conrad. 2009. In Mithridate. Mithridates (1555), ed. Bernard Columbat and Manfred Peters, 14–48. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramophone, September 30, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halton, Eugene. 1995. Bereft of Reason: On the Decline of Social Thought and Prospects for Its Renewal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 2008. Letter on Humanism. In Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell, 141–183. San Francisco: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, Johan. 1949. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Derrick. 2006. Endgame, Volume II: Resistance. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, Ray. 2009. Transcendent Man. Directed by Barry Ptolemy. Ptolemaic Productions and Therapy Studios.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, Ian L. 1995. Design with Nature. 1st ed. New York: Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Daniel. 1995. Anecdotes and the Shifting Baseline Syndrome of Fisheries. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10 (10): 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallis, Raymond. 2007. Enhancing Humanity. Philosophy Now 61 (May/June). https://philosophynow.org/issues/61/Enhancing_Humanity

  • Voland, Eckart, and Wulf Schiefenhövel, eds. 2009. The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartella, Ellen A., and Nancy Jennings. 2000. Children and Computers: New Technology. Old Concerns. The Future of Children 10 (2): 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, Langdon. 1989. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glawson, G.M. (2018). Will the Transhuman Future Be Good or Bad for Humanity?. In: Donaldson, S., Cole-Turner, R. (eds) Christian Perspectives on Transhumanism and the Church. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90323-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics