Abstract
In contemporary literary criticism, case studies have become more important than analysis of models, and the reflection on narratives more important than that of structures. This movement has been reinforced by a new scientism mainly represented by cognitive sciences that reintegrate literature into the order of ordinary mental facts dependent on brain function and justifying explanations. At the same time, the approaches founded upon data produced by digital humanities have also purported to render literary studies scientific, that is, falsifiable. This paper shows how the decline of linguistic theory has led to pragmatic and empirical field approaches to literary studies, and highlights how, just as post-structuralist hypertextualism dissolved the specificity of literariness, the normalization of literary knowledge in scientifically informed new approaches undermines the specificity of literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Baroni, Raphael. La Tension narrative: suspense, curiosité et surprise. Paris: Seuil, 2007.
Carroll, Joseph. Reading Human Nature: Literary Darwinism in Theory and Practice. Albany: SUNY Press, 2011.
Compagnon, Antoine. Le Démon de la théorie. Paris: Seuil, 1998.
Dehaene, Stanislas. Les Neurones de la lecture. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2007.
Duchan, Judith F., Gail A. Bruder, and Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.). Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
Ehrenberg, Alain. “Sciences sociales, pas cognitives” Libération, 23 septembre 2008. Web. http://www.liberation.fr/tribune/2008/09/23/sciences-sociales-pas-cognitives_14359. Last Accessed 26 December 2017.
Fish, Stanley. “Consequences.” Critical Inquiry 11, no. 3 (March 1985): 433–458.
François, Cusset, and Frédéric Lordon. “Débat: Le Refus de la théorie.” Web. http://te-doctorants.blogspot.fr/2013/09/debat-le-refus-de-la-theorie-23e-salon.html. Last Accessed 26 December 2017.
Fromm, Harold. The Nature of Being Human: From Environmentalism to Consciousness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
Gavins, Joanna, and Gerard Steen (eds.). Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge, 2003.
Gottschall, Jonathan. Literature, Science, and a New Humanities. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Gottschall, Jonathan. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Makes Us Human. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012.
Guerin, Wilfred L., Earle Labor, Lee Morgan, Jeanne C. Reesman, and John R. Willingham. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, 6e ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Knapp, Stephen, and Walter Benn Michaels. “Against Theory.” Critical Inquiry 8, no. 4 (Summer 1982): 723–742.
Lageira, Jacinto. “Artialisation” In Pouivet, Roger and Jacques Morizot (eds.), Dictionnaire de philosophie esthétique, 2nd ed. Paris: Armand Colin, 2012: 49–50.
Laugier, Sandra. L’Apprentissage de l’obvie: l’anthropologie logique de Quine. Paris: J. Vrin, 1992.
Laugier, Sandra. Wittgenstein, le mythe de l’inexpressivité. Paris: J. Vrin, 2010.
Leitch, Vincent B. Literary Criticism in the 21st Century. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
Max’s, D. T. expression in his “The Literary Darwinists.” The New York Times Magazine, 6 novembre 2005. Web. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/magazine/06darwin.html.
Metz-Lutz, Marie-Noëlle, Yannick Bressan, Nathalie Heider, and Hélène Otzenberger. “What Physiological Changes and Cerebral Traces Tell Us About Adhesion to Fiction During Theater-Watching?” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4 (2010): 59.
Mitchell, W. J. T. Against Theory: Literary Studies and the New Pragmatism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Mithen, Steve J. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion, and Science. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996.
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London and New York: Verso, 2005.
Moretti, Franco. “Literature, Measured.” Literary Lab Pamphlets, no. 12, April 2016. Web. https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet12.pdf. Last Accessed 26 December 2017.
Quine, W. V. “Epistemology Naturalized.” Ontological Relativity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.
Rorty, Richard. “Philosophy Without Principles.” Critical Inquiry 11, no. 3 (March 1985): 459–465.
Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. La Fin de l’exception humaine. Paris: Gallimard, 2007.
Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Théorie des signaux coûteux, esthétique et art. Présentation de Suzanne Foisy. Rimouski (Québec): Tangence éditeur, 2009.
Shapiro, Stuart C., and William J. Rapaport. “An Introduction to a Computational Reader of Narratives.” In Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., Hewitt, L. E. (eds.), Deixis in Narrative. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995: 79–105.
Stockwell, Peter. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2002.
Tallis, Raymond. “Neurotrash. Humans Are Special.” Prospect. Web. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/neurotrash-brain-chemistry-biologism-neurones-darwin/. Last Accessed 26 December 2017.
Tsur, Reuven. “Some Cognitive Foundations of ‘Cultural Programs.’” Poetics Today 23, no. 1 (2000): 63–89.
Vandaele, Jeroen, and Geert Brône (eds.). Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009.
Vidal, Fernando. “La neuroesthétique, un esthétisme scientiste” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 25, no. 2 (2011): 239–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gefen, A. (2018). The Empirical Turn of Literary Studies. In: Pireddu, N. (eds) Reframing Critical, Literary, and Cultural Theories. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89990-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89990-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89989-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89990-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)