Skip to main content

International Justice in Elder Care: The Long Run

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Economics and Bioethics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances in Behavioral Economics ((PABE))

  • 604 Accesses

Abstract

In the short run, the cross-border migration of elder-care workers is a zero-sum game, with the source country losing and the host country gaining. This offends our sense of justice, especially since the host populations tend to be richer. In this chapter, I argue that we ought to direct our gaze beyond the short run, at the long run. Once we do that, we will see possibilities of non-zero-sum games that are mutually beneficial. The large question arises, though, as to how nations may choose among them by committing to some principle of justice.

This chapter was published as Lee (2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United Nations (2006, Table A.III.3) defines an elderly person as someone who is 65 years or older and a young person as someone who is between 15 and 64 years old.

  2. 2.

    It is also suggestive of the harshness of the work that the turnover rate among care workers in nursing homes is relatively high (Smith and Baughman 2007, pp. 24–25).

  3. 3.

    There is also the risk that, as a result of population loss, the source population may not be able to sustain itself. The risk is high if the two populations are similar.

  4. 4.

    This relationship does not hold in general. The dependency ratio rises back up to 0.44 when the rate of immigration of young people increases to 1.0 million.

  5. 5.

    Immigrant caregivers substitute for “informal caregivers,” who are spouses and children. Studies show that, as more elder care is bought in the market, informal caregivers’ health improves (Christakis and Iwashyna 2003; Gaugler et al. 2007). This is another reason why immigration is good for national health.

  6. 6.

    The Nash Solution is the solution where the product of the net gains of participants is the greatest. (The largest rectangle that can be formed from a line segment is a square, which has equal borders.) In our case, the gains are the decreases in dependency ratios. With an annual flow of 1.0 million immigrants, the product (0.3 − 0.5)(0.5 − 0.7) = 0.04; with an annual flow of 0.5 million immigrants, the product (0.4 − 0.5)(0.6 − 0.7) = 0.01. Since 0.04 is greater than 0.01, the annual flow of 1.0 million immigrants is the Nash Solution.

References

  • Anand, Sudhir, Fabienne Peter, and Amartya Sen, eds. Public Health, Ethics, and Equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Colette V., and Kathryn L. Braun. “Immigration and the Direct Long-Term Care Workforce: Implications for Education and Policy.” Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 29 (2), July 2008, pp. 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, C., K. Braun, and P. Arnsberger. “Filipinas as Residential Long-Term Care Providers: Influence of Cultural Values, Structural Inequality, and Immigration Status on Career Choice.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 48, 2007, pp. 698–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, Lynda C., Bozena Zdaniuk, Richard Schulz, Sharon Jackson, and Calvin Hirsch. “Transitions in Spousal Caregiving.” The Gerontologist, 43, 2003, pp. 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, Nicholas A., and Theodore Iwashyna. “The Health Impact of Health Care on Families: A Matched Cohort Study of Hospice Use by Decedents and Mortality Outcomes in Surviving, Widowed Spouses.” Social Science and Medicine, 57 (3), August 2003, pp. 465–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covinsky, Kenneth E., Robert Newcomer, Patrick Fox, Joan Wood, Laura Sands, Kyle Dane, and Kristine Yaffe. “Patient and Caregiver Characteristics Associated with Depression in Caregivers of Patients with Dementia.” Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18 (12), December 2003, pp. 1006–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (US). The Future Supply of Long-Term Care Workers in Relation to the Aging Baby Boom Generation: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckenwiler, Lisa. “Care Worker Migration and Transnational Justice.” Public Health Ethics, 2 (2), July 2009, pp. 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, Joseph E., Anne M. Pot, and Steven H. Zarit. “Long-Term Adaptation to Institutionalization in Dementia Caregivers.” The Gerontologist, 47 (6), 2007, pp. 730–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, William E., Laurie A. LaMonde, Beth Han, Allison M. Burton, and Ronald Schonwetter. “Predictors of Depression and Life Satisfaction Among Spousal Caregivers in Hospice: Application of a Stress Process Model.” Journal of Palliative Medicine, 6 (2), April 2003, pp. 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Suzanne, Alfred Chan, Jean Woo, Portia Chong, and Aprille Sham. “Impact of Caregiving on Health and Quality of Life: A Comparative Population-Based Study of Caregivers for Elderly Persons and Noncaregivers.” The Journals of Gerontological Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64A (8), 2009, pp. 873–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, Larry, and Kelly Hubbell. “The Burnout Risk for Male Caregivers in Providing Care to Spouses Affiliated with Alzheimer’s Disease.” Journal of Health Human Service Administration, 25 (1), Summer 2002, pp. 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future Health Care Workforce for Older Americans. Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jung-Hyun, and Bob G. Knight. “Effects of Caregiver Status, Coping Styles, and Social Support on the Physical Health of Korean American Caregivers.” The Gerontologist, 48, 2008, pp. 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Li Way. “International Justice in Elder Care: The Long Run.” Public Health Ethics, 4 (3), 2011, pp. 292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Sunmin, Graham A. Colditz, Lisa F. Berkman, and Ichiro Kawachi. “Caregiving and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in U.S. Women: A Prospective Study.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24 (2), February 2003, pp. 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, F. M. E., J. Galvez-Tan, K. Icamina, and L. Javier. “Nurse Migration from a Source Country Perspective: Philippine Country Case Study.” Health Services Research, 42, June 2007, pp. 1406–1418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan, and Howard Raiffa. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Joanne. Sick to Death and Not Going to Take It Anymore! Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, Jane, Eric Latimer, Martin Cole, Antonio Ciampi, and Maida Sewitch. “Major Depression Among Medically Ill Elders Contributes to Sustained Poor Mental Health in Their Informal Caregivers.” Age and Ageing, 36 (4), 2007, pp. 400–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, Jeffrey, and D’Vera Cohn. “U.S. Population Projections: 2005–2050.” PEW Research Center, February 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfoot, Donald L., and Ari N. Houser. We Shall Travel On: Quality of Care, Economic Development, and the International Migration of Long-Term Care Workers. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute, October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Richard, and Scott Beach. “Caregiving as a Risk Factor for Mortality.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1999, pp. 2215–2219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Kristin, and Reagan Baughman. “Caring for America’s Aging Population: A Profile of the Direct-Care Workforce.” Monthly Labor Review, September 2007, pp. 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • The President’s Council on Bioethics. Taking Care: Ethical Caregiving in Our Aging Society. Washington DC, September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. World Population Ageing 2007. Population Division, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaliano, Peter P., Jianping Zhang, and James M. Scanlan. “Is Caregiving Hazardous to One’s Physical Health? A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin, 129 (6), 2003, pp. 946–972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Way Lee .

Appendix: Two Populations Linked by Migration

Appendix: Two Populations Linked by Migration

I assume that there are two populations in the world: the host and the source. In each population, the numbers of the elderly (E) and the young (Y) change according to linear differential equations:

$$\frac{\delta E}{\delta t} = aY - dE + i_{E}$$
(1)
$$\frac{\delta Y}{\delta t} = bY - cE + i_{Y}$$
(2)

where

a :

 the rate of aging

b :

the net replacement rate among the young

c :

the cost of caregiving in terms of young lives lost per elderly person

d :

the death rate among the elderly

i E :

the flow of migration of elderly people (+ if host; − if source)

i Y :

the flow of migration of young people (+ if host; − if source)

In my analysis, I assign numerical values to demographic parameters that ensure that both populations will converge in the long run. See Table 2.

Table 2 Demographic parameters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, L.W. (2018). International Justice in Elder Care: The Long Run. In: Behavioral Economics and Bioethics. Palgrave Advances in Behavioral Economics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89779-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics