Skip to main content

Optimizing the Strategic Asset Allocation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1058 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we discussed different approaches to forming expectations about future returns of the main asset classes but made only casual reference to the question of risk. In this chapter, we examine the issue of integrating risk and return, that is, optimizing the SAA. The mechanics of standard mean-variance optimization (MVO) are outlined in the Appendix to the book. Here we will focus on some of the challenges when applying MVO, possible remedies and alternative approaches.

“It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong.”

—Warren Buffet

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Early work in this field was done by Mandelbrot (1963a, b) and Fama (1965). For an overview of more recent studies, see, for example, Rachev et al. (2005).

  2. 2.

    Sample skewness is calculated as \( \frac{n}{\left(n-1\right)\left(n-2\right)}{\sum}_{i=1}^n{\left(\frac{x_i-\overline{x}}{\sigma_s}\right)}^3, \) where n is the number of observations, \( \overline{x} \) is the mean of the sample and σs is the standard deviation of the sample. As n becomes large, this expression can be approximated by \( \frac{1}{n}\kern0.1em {\sum}_{i=1}^n{\left(\frac{x-\overline{x}}{\sigma_s}\right)}^3. \) Excess kurtosis is calculated as \( \frac{n\left(n+1\right)}{\left(n-1\right)\left(n-2\right)\left(n-3\right)}{\sum}_{i=1}^n{\left(\frac{x_i-\overline{x}}{\sigma_s}\right)}^4-3 \) which can be approximated by \( \frac{1}{n}{\sum}_{i=1}^n{\left(\frac{x_i-\overline{x}}{\sigma_s}\right)}^4-3 \) for a large n.

  3. 3.

    Corresponding to a one-sided 99.73% confidence interval.

  4. 4.

    This value can be calculated in Excel by using the NORMSINV function.

  5. 5.

    See also Artzner et al. (1999).

  6. 6.

    See further Rockafellar and Uryasev (2002).

  7. 7.

    We provide an illustration of how weights are calculated using RP in the note at the end of the chapter.

References

  • Anderson, R., S. Bianchi, and L. Goldberg. 2012. “Will My Risk Parity Strategy Outperform?”, Financial Analysts Journal, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, Andrew, and J. Chen. 2002. “Asymmetric Correlations of Equity Portfolios”, Journal of Financial Economics, 63(3), 443–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath. 1999. “Coherent Measures of Risk”, Mathematical Finance, 9, 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asness, Clifford S., Andrea Frazzini, and Lasse H. Pedersen. 2012. “Leverage Aversion and Risk Parity”, Financial Analysts Journal, January/February, 68(1), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae, K. H., G. A. Karolyi, and R. M. Stulz. 2003. “A New Approach to Measuring Financial Market Contagion”, Review of Financial Studies, 16, 717–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Michael J., and Robert G. Grauer. 1991. “On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results”, Review of Financial Studies, 4(2), 315. 28p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten-Jones, Mark. 1999. “The Sampling Error in Estimates of Mean-Variance Efficient Portfolio Weights”, The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, M. 1993. “Computing Efficient Frontiers Using Estimated Parameters”, Annals of Operations Research: Special Issue on Financial Engineering, 45, 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G., E. Jacquier, M. Kritzman, and K. Lowry. 1999. “Optimal Portfolios in Good Times and Bad”, Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, Victor, Lorenzo Garlappi, and Raman Uppal. 2009. “Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient Is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy?”, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. 1965. “The Behaviour of Stock-Market Prices”, Journal of Business, 38, 34–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Paul D. 2009. “Déjà Vu All Over Again”, Morningstar Advisor, (February/March): 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman, M., and Y. Li. 2010. “Skulls, Financial Turbulence, and Risk Management”, Financial Analysts Journal, 66, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman, M., S. Page, and D. Turkington. 2010. “In Defense of Optimization: The Fallacy of 1/N”, Financial Analysts Journal, 66(2), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, Olivier, and Michael Wolf. 2003. “Improved Estimation of the Covariance Matrix of Stock Returns with an Application to Portfolio Selection”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10, 603–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, Olivier, and Michael Wolf. 2004. “Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix – Problems in Mean-Variance Optimization”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(4), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, John. 1965a. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, February, 47, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, John. 1965b. “Security Prices, Risk and Maximal Gains from Diversification”, Journal of Finance, December, 20, 587–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longin, F. and Solnik, B. 2001. “Extreme correlation of international equity markets”, Journal of Finance, 56(2), 649–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. 1963a. “New Methods in Statistical Economics”, Journal of Political Economy, 71, 421–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. 1963b. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices”, Journal of Business, 36, 394–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, Harry. 1952. “Portfolio Selection”, Journal of Finance, March, 7, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, Harry. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversifications of Investments. Cowles Foundation. Monograph No. 16. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, R. 1989. “The Markowitz Optimization Enigma: Is Optimization Optimal?” Financial Analysts Journal, 45(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin, Jan. 1966. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market”, Econometrica, October, 35, 768–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachev, S. T., C. Menn, and F. J. Fabozzi. 2005. “Fat-Tailed and Skewed Asset Distributions”. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, T. R., and S. Uryasev 2002. “Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distribution”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(7), 1443–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, William F. 1964. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk”, Journal of Finance, September, 19, 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J. L. 1962. “Toward a Theory of Market Value of Risky Assets”, Unpublished manuscript. Final version in Asset Pricing and Portfolio Performance, 1999, ed. Robert A. Korajczyk, 15–22. London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, J. X., and T. M. Idzorek. 2011. “The Impact of Skewness and Fat Tails on the Asset Allocation Decision”, Financial Analysts Journal, 67(2), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lumholdt, H. (2018). Optimizing the Strategic Asset Allocation. In: Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89554-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89554-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89553-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89554-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics