Skip to main content

‘How To Be Useful in War Time’ Queen Mary’s Leadership in the War Effort 1914–1918

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monarchies and the Great War

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Modern Monarchy ((PSMM))

Abstract

This chapter identifies the importance of the wider royal family for the success of individual monarchical institutions, with a focus on Britain’s Queen consort. It argues that active contributions made by a whole family, displayed as being united behind the monarch, were of significant value in reinforcing positive perceptions of the monarchy and demonstrating its relevance to contemporary concerns. From the start, Queen Mary played an active leadership role in the Great War. She not only ensured a public understanding that her husband was supported by his immediate family in the war effort, but also took a lead in demonstrating to the British public that the Royal Family as a whole, not just the King, were both appreciative of and actively and practically engaged with the war effort. Emphasis is often put on the contributions of women suffrage activists to inspiring their sisters to come forward and work for victory. This chapter demonstrates that for a majority of women both in Britain and the Empire, it was the Queen who acted as a crucial leadership symbol for their war efforts. Queen Mary from the start, sought to depict herself as emblematic of British womanhood generally, and in backing up her husband’s efforts to engage directly with his army and navy, she thereby broadened the public profile and usefulness of the Royal Family both in Britain itself and throughout the Empire. This helped to provide a very positive image for the female ‘stay-at-homes’, showing that they too had a total involvement in the war effort even if they were not engaged in high profile activity such as becoming a nurse on the Front Line, or volunteering to work in munitions factories. The Queen’s apparently indefatigable efforts to involve British women in being ‘useful’ in war included more traditional work like caring for the wounded and raising funds for war-related good causes. But it also led her into taking active steps (aided by ‘Red’ Mary Macarthur) to assist working women in Britain, and to her involvement with the formalisation of women’s roles in the Army Auxiliary Corps, with the formation of Queen Mary’s Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps—giving it her name to mark her approval of its members and its efforts. This chapter thus provides an assessment of the contribution made by women who did not challenge the traditional stereotypes of femininity, and who felt supported and confirmed in their usefulness in war by the royal role model provided by Queen Mary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Most notably, she had paid for a fully-equipped hospital ship to go to Africa, and in 1902, founded the Queen Alexandra’s Imperial Army Nursing Corps. See, for instance, Geoffrey Wakeford (1971) Three Consort Queens: Adelaide, Alexandra and Mary (London: Hale); Julie Piggott (1990) Queen Alexandra’s Royal Army Nursing Corps (Barnsley: Pen and Sword) pp38–9 in particular.

  2. 2.

    For the involvement and contributions of royal women from other states, see notably Chapter 4, p87; and Chapter 9, p251.

  3. 3.

    Catriona Pennell (2012) A Kingdom United: Popular Responses to the Outbreak of the First World War in Britain and Ireland (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p223.

  4. 4.

    For more discussion of this, see Heather Jones (2016) ‘The Nature of Kingship in the First World War’, in Matthew Glencross, Judith Rowbotham and Michael Kandiah, eds The Windsor Dynasty: Long to Reign Over Us? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) pp194–216.

  5. 5.

    See, for instance, the discussions of Queen Victoria’s active and sustained interest in the welfare of her soldiers and sailors during military campaigns during her reign in Helen Rappaport (2003) Queen Victoria: A Biographical Companion (London: ABC-Clio) p107; Paula Bartley (2016) Queen Victoria (Abingdon: Routledge) p287.

  6. 6.

    See, for example, W. Davenport Adams (1868) Stories of the Lives of Noble Women (London: Nelson and Sons); Anna Jameson (1836) Lives of Celebrated Female Sovereigns and Illustrious Women (London: Fisher and Sons).

  7. 7.

    Jean Bethke Elshtain (1998) Preface, Women and War (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press); Judith Rowbotham (2000) ‘“Only When Drunk”: The Stereotyping of Violence in Britain, c1850–1900’ in Shani D’Cruze, ed. Everyday Violence in Britain 18501950 (Harlow: Longmans) 155–69, pp55–6.

  8. 8.

    Elshtain, Women and War, px.

  9. 9.

    Rudyard Kipling (1903) ‘The Lesson’.

  10. 10.

    Piggott, QARANC; Anne Summers (1988) Angels and Citizens: British Women as Military Nurses 18541914 (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

  11. 11.

    For contemporary reflections on women’s roles see, amongst others, Evelyn Everett Green (1904) The Three Graces (London: Andrew Melrose) dealing with the domestic front during the Boer War; similarly see Rosa Nouchette Carey (1903) Passage Perilous (London: Macmillan); L. T. Meade (1901) A Sister of the Red Cross. A Tale of the South African War (London: Nelson). Most recently see Jennifer Doyle (2017) ‘Imagined Communities in the First World War: Food, Periodicals and Readers’, Unpublished PhD thesis, King’s College, London.

  12. 12.

    See, for example, Maggie Andrews and Janis Lomas, eds (2014) The Home Front in Britain: Images, Myths and Forgotten Experiences Since 1904 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

  13. 13.

    As histories of nursing show, as the war progressed, many more women became involved in nursing the wounded and sick servicemen than were members of the Army medical services. Civilian nurses on hospital ships and in hospitals at home, as well as the Voluntary Aid Detachments (VADs). See Summers, Angels and Citizens; Vivien Newman (2014) We Also Served: The Forgotten Women of the First World War (Barnsley: Pen and Sword) Chapter 2.

  14. 14.

    The extent to which women’s domestic duties to home and family were considered paramount is underlined by Vera Brittain’s experience. Men could not expect to be relieved from war duties because they were needed at home; women were expected to demonstrate their traditional feminine instincts by putting these first, as Vera did when her father summoned her home in March 1918, because her mother had collapsed under the strain of running a war-time household. Vera returned home in April 1918, and took up home duties, if resentfully. See Mark Bostridge (2015) Vera Brittain and the First World War: The Story of Testament of Youth (London: Bloomsbury) pp99–100.

  15. 15.

    ‘Ladies Page’, Illustrated London News, 25 July 1914.

  16. 16.

    Not all suffragists, or suffragettes, however, felt able to support the war directly because of their personal pacifist beliefs. Sylvia Pankhurst’s pacifism is well-known, but other figures including the suffragists Catherine Marshall and Maude Royden continued to agitate for peace. For more on this, including the Women’s International League and its activities during and just after the war, see David Patterson (2012) The Search for Negotiated Peace: Women’s Activism and Citizen Diplomacy in World War I (Abingdon: Routledge) pp233–4.

  17. 17.

    Susan Greyzel (2013) Women and the First World War (Abingdon: Routledge) pp37–38; Newman, We Also Served.

  18. 18.

    Helen Jones (2014) Women in British Public Life 19141950: Gender, Power and Social Policy (Abingdon: Routledge) p32.

  19. 19.

    See Antonia Raeburn (1973) The Militant Suffragettes (London: Michael Joseph), see also June Purvis (2003) Emmeline Pankhurst. A Biography (London: Routledge) pp275–9.

  20. 20.

    Ibid. See also ‘The Women’s March Through London’, The Times, 22 July 1915.

  21. 21.

    Many general and specialist texts on the period highlight Christabel Pankhurst’s claim that victory won with British women’s aid would advance the suffrage cause for women. See, for instance, George Robb (2014) British Culture and the First World War (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan); Sandra Houlton and June Purvis, eds (2002) Votes for Women (London: Routledge).

  22. 22.

    Peter Grant (2014) Philanthropy and Voluntary Action in the First World War: Mobilising Charity (Basingstoke: Routledge) p50. Mrs Fawcett made no attempt to dissuade other NUWSS members to share her internationalist views which made it difficult for her to emulate Mrs Pankhurst in taking part in recruitment activities etc. However, both condemned the International Congress of Women, meeting at the Hague in 1915, as giving comfort to the enemy. See Purvis, Emmeline Pankhurst, p274.

  23. 23.

    Jacqueline de Vries (2003) ‘Gendering Patriotism: Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst and World War One’, in Sybil Oldfield, ed. This Working Day World: Women’s Lives and Culture(s) in Britain 19141945 (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).

  24. 24.

    Ibid. By contrast, Sylvia came out formally as a pacifist and split with her mother and sister to form the Workers Suffrage Federation. See Grant, Philanthropy, p50.

  25. 25.

    ‘A Nation at Prayer’, The Times, 3 August 1914.

  26. 26.

    ‘Women’s Work’, The Times, 17 August 1914.

  27. 27.

    This activity was not, however, either lengthily or extensively reported. See ‘Women’s Future Status’, The Times, 29 March 1916; ‘The Future of the Suffrage’, The Times, 16 May 1916; ‘War Work and Votes. The Demands of Women Suffragists’, The Times, 21 February 1917.

  28. 28.

    Purvis, Emmeline Pankhurst, p309.

  29. 29.

    Millicent Fawcett (1923) The Women’s VictoryAnd After. Personal Reminiscences 19111918 (London: Sidgwick and Jackson) p87.

  30. 30.

    See, for instance, Grant, Philanthropy, pp50–4.

  31. 31.

    Notably Newman, We Also Served; Jones, Women; Grayzel, Women.

  32. 32.

    See for instance Robb, British Culture; Adrian Gregory (2008) The Last Great War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  33. 33.

    Recently, an admirable PhD thesis has begun to remedy this: Doyle, ‘Imagined Communities’.

  34. 34.

    The royal visit to Nottingham took place on 24 June 1914; that morning a militant suffragette, Eileen Casey, was arrested in an attempt to plant explosives under the platform the King and Queen would stand on in Market Square. ‘King and Queen’s Visit to Nottingham’, The Times, 25 June 1914; ‘Police News’, Nottingham Guardian, 26 June 1914.

  35. 35.

    See ‘The King’s Stroke for Irish Peace, the Ulster Conference’, Illustrated London News, 25 July 1914; ‘The King’s Speech’, The Times, 25 July 1914. The Buckingham Palace Conference failed, but the role of the King was generally applauded in the media.

  36. 36.

    In the face of attacks by the radical press on the King’s intervention and its tone, the mainstream press robustly refuted any suggestion of constitutional impropriety, see ‘Mr Asquith’s Vindication of the King’, The Times, 23 July 1914.

  37. 37.

    ‘England’s Duty’, The Times, 1 August 1914.

  38. 38.

    ‘The King’s Intervention’, The Times, 1 August 1914.

  39. 39.

    ‘Court and Society’, The Times, 2 August 1914. There is also an interesting echo in the use of the Dowager Duchess of Parma as a channel for ‘behind-the-scenes’ diplomacy, in Chapter 4.

  40. 40.

    ‘Cabinet Today’, The Times, 2 August 1914, which noted the large crowds assembled outside Downing Street, to watch the arrival of the full membership of the Cabinet. See also ‘The Nation and the Government’, The Times, 4 August 1914.

  41. 41.

    ‘A Nation at Prayer’, The Times, 3 August 1914.

  42. 42.

    See, for instance, ‘London and the Declaration of War. Impressive Midnight Scene: The King and His People’, The Times, 5 August 1914.

  43. 43.

    Frank Prochaska (1995) Royal Bounty: The Making of a Welfare Monarchy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) p75.

  44. 44.

    John Plunkett (2003) Queen VictoriaFirst Media Monarch (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p61. See also Helen Rappaport (2003) Queen Victoria. A Biographical Companion, (London: ABC Clio) p110.

  45. 45.

    ‘He has given his life for his Queen and Country’, Editorial, Western Mail, 30 October 1900.

  46. 46.

    ‘Prince and Peasant’, Western Mail, 31 October 1900.

  47. 47.

    Valerie Parkhouse (2015) Memorialising the Anglo-Boer War 18991902 (Leicester: Troubador Publishing) Chapter 3, on the royal family’s involvement.

  48. 48.

    See, for instance, James Macaulay (1904) Queen Victoria and Other Excellent Women (London: Religious Tract Society).

  49. 49.

    Anne Anderson (2002) ‘Queen Victoria’s Daughters and “The Tide of Fashionable Philanthropy”’, Women’s History Magazine, 41, pp10–15.

  50. 50.

    Frank Prochaska (1988) Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p35.

  51. 51.

    See, for instance, Sir Clement Kinloch-Cooke (1900) A Memory of Her Royal Highness, Princess Mary Adelaide, Duchess of Teck (New York: Scribners).

  52. 52.

    Charlotte Cavendish (1930) The Biography of H. M. Queen Mary (New York: A.E. Marriot) pp171–2.

  53. 53.

    The Duke and Duchess also toured the colonies, and similar sympathy and enthusiasm was demonstrated there. See ‘News of the Day’, Birmingham Daily Post, 24 July 1900; ‘Women’s Chat’, Ipswich Journal 19 December 1900; ‘The Royal Tour’, The Times, 29 May 1901.

  54. 54.

    ‘The King at War’, The Times, 5 August 1914.

  55. 55.

    See, for instance, ‘The King Salutes His Son’s Regiment: Grenadiers in War Kit’, Illustrated London News, 15 August 1914.

  56. 56.

    ‘The Canadian Force. The Duke of Connaught to Go Into Camp’, The Times, 12 August 1914.

  57. 57.

    See, for instance, ‘The Royal Tour’, The Times, 15 May 1917.

  58. 58.

    ‘Wounded Men at the Palace’, The Times, 22 March 1916.

  59. 59.

    For the full lyrics, see http://www.firstworldwar.com/audio/yourkingandcountrywantyou.htm, accessed 23 July 2015.

  60. 60.

    ‘A Woman’s Recruiting Song’, Daily Mail, 14 September 1914.

  61. 61.

    There had been a considerable scope for wartime philanthropy since the Crimean War. See Matthew Hendley (2012) Organised Patriotism and the Crucible of War (Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press); Grant, Philanthropy.

  62. 62.

    ‘Court and Society’, The Times, 9 August 1914.

  63. 63.

    ‘Queen’s Appeal’, The Times, 7 August 1914; ‘Queen Alexandra’s Appeal’, The Times, 8 August 1914.

  64. 64.

    ‘The War Day by Day’, The Times, 8 August 1914.

  65. 65.

    ‘The Prince of Wales’ Fund, The Times, 8 August 1914.

  66. 66.

    Ibid.

  67. 67.

    ‘Prince of Wales Appeal: £2,063,000’, Daily Mail, 4 September 1914. While there was some criticism over the administration and fears that it was not being promptly dispensed, Balfour provided detailed assurances this was not the case. See ‘The Prince of Wales Fund’, The Times, 14 September 1914.

  68. 68.

    ‘Princess Mary’s League’, Daily Mail, 2 September 1914; see also Grant, Philanthropy, pp40–41.

  69. 69.

    See, for instance, ‘Royal War Relief Purchases’, Daily Mail, 6 January 1914.

  70. 70.

    Newman, We Also Served, rightly dedicates a substantial amount of coverage to women’s fund-raising.

  71. 71.

    Ibid., Chapter 1.

  72. 72.

    David Llewellyn (2010) The First Lady of Mulberry Walk: The Life and Times of Irish Sculptress Anne Acheson (Leicester: Matador Press).

  73. 73.

    ‘Queen’s Committee’, The Times, 9 August 1914.

  74. 74.

    See for instance, Julia Bush (2000) Edwardian Ladies and Imperial Power (London: A & C Black) pp43–5.

  75. 75.

    ‘Queen Mary’s Needlework Guild’, The Times, 10 August 1914.

  76. 76.

    Then the Soldiers and Sailors Families Association; now Soldiers, Sailors and Airman Families Association, SSAFA.

  77. 77.

    ‘Her Majesty’s Appeal’, The Times, 10 August 1914.

  78. 78.

    ‘What Women Are Doing’, Daily Mail, 3 June 1915. There were many other women associated with the work of the Guild informally, of course.

  79. 79.

    ‘Women’s Work’, The Times, 17 August 1914. Daughter of the Dean of Westminster and author of several royal biographies, Mrs Alexander Murray Smith was the identified co-ordinator of this aspect of the QMNG, appealing also for women to come forward to act as local organisers, distributing materials, setting up working parties etc.

  80. 80.

    Anon (1919) Queen Mary’s Needlework Guild: Its Work During the Great War (London: St James’ Palace); Grant, Philanthropy, p74.

  81. 81.

    ‘Lord Kitchener’s Letter of Gratitude to the Queen’, Daily Mail, 15 December 1915.

  82. 82.

    ‘The Queen’s Appeal. Widespread Response from All Ranks’, The Times, 14 August 1914.

  83. 83.

    Set up in 1914 under the auspices of the Guild was the Surgical Requisites Association, based at Mulberry Walk, Chelsea, which particularly concentrated on the medical necessities needed for nursing the wounded. Initially concentrating on dressings, bandages etc., it went on to work on more ‘sculptural’ aids, from cages to plaster casts. For more details of its work, Llewellyn, First Lady of Mulberry Walk.

  84. 84.

    ‘Her Majesty’s Quest’, The Times, 28 March 1915; Anon, QMNG. The importance of the sustained anecdotal tributes to her involvement is that those paying tribute had no reason, post-1918, to give tribute where it was not due: so this suggests that her involvement made an enduring impact on ordinary Guild members.

  85. 85.

    ‘The Queen’, The Times, 28 March 1915. By all accounts, her habit of turning up to check on operations could be slightly off-putting to returning servicemen, when confronted by her immaculately-clad and imposing figure as they were consuming sandwiches or hot drinks, and then being exhorted by her to carry on consuming!

  86. 86.

    ‘The Queen and the Wounded. A Sympathetic Suggestion’, The Times, 22 August 1914.

  87. 87.

    ‘The King’s Return’, Editorial, The Times, 7 December 1914.

  88. 88.

    ‘Care of the Wounded’, The Times, 9 August 1914.

  89. 89.

    ‘The Queen and the Army’, The Times, 24 February 1915.

  90. 90.

    Doyle, ‘Imagined Communities’.

  91. 91.

    Grant, Philanthropy, p38.

  92. 92.

    ‘Voluntary Workers’, The Times, 22 August 1914.

  93. 93.

    It was the Queen who took the initiative in setting up a meeting, via Lady Crewe initially. See David Duff (1985) Queen Mary (London: Collins) p161.

  94. 94.

    ‘Women’s Work for Women Fund’, Editorial, Daily Mail, 4 September 1914; Deborah Thom (2010) Nice Girls and Rude Girls (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p30. Out of the QWWF emerged the Central Committee on Women’s Work and Training, also actively supported by the Queen and involving Mary Macarthur.

  95. 95.

    ‘The Queen’s Work for Women Fund. Message from Her Majesty. Employment Better Than Charity’, Daily Mail, 4 September 1914.

  96. 96.

    It is easy to criticise the low wages paid in these Workshops—but the aim was to employ as many as possible, and it was at least employment. The contemporary evidence is that many of the women employed were grateful for that overall and things improved, at least marginally, as government contracts began to be directed to the Workshops. Equally, Mary Macarthur continued to campaign for minimum wages and overall improved pay rates and conditions for women throughout the war. See Gerry Holloway (2007) Women and Work in Britain Since 1840 (Abingdon: Routledge) pp131–2; Gail Braybon (2012) Women Workers in the First World War (Abingdon: Routledge) pp44–5.

  97. 97.

    Thom, Nice Girls, pp30–1. See also ‘Women Breadwinners: Useful Work of the Queen’s Fund’, Daily Mail, 26 October 1914.

  98. 98.

    The association continued after the ending of the Great War, ending only with Mary Macarthur’s early death in 1921.

  99. 99.

    ‘Queen Visits East End Factories’, Daily Mail, 15 October 1914.

  100. 100.

    ‘King and Queen Visit Liverpool’, Daily Mail, 10 June 1916.

  101. 101.

    There were a number of these, in both domestic and industrial roles, as is revealed in contemporary fiction. See, in particular, C. N. and A. M. Williamson (1917) Everyman’s Land (London: Hutchinson) with its description of life on the front line immediately behind the trenches. While the focus is on the fighting forces, there are vivid depictions of the women working here as well.

  102. 102.

    ‘Queen’s Visit to France’, The Times, 19 July 1917. The origins of the Corps lay in the suggestion that a volunteer force of uniformed women be established to free up men from the need to serve in subsidiary support roles behind the Front lines—recognising the extent to which more informally, this was already going on. See Samantha Philo-Gill (2017) The Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps in France 191721. Women Urgently Wanted (Barnsley: Pen and Sword) Chapter 1.

  103. 103.

    Ibid.

  104. 104.

    ‘Queen Mary’s Army Named’, Daily Mail, 20 April 1918, advertised as giving the Corps ‘the royal recognition it deserved’. This was part of an attempt led by the Queen to redeem the racy reputation that the WAAC had rapidly acquired, which was reflected regularly in the media of the day. See Janet Watson (2004) Fighting Different Wars: Experience, Memory and the First World War in Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp36–40.

  105. 105.

    See, for instance, ‘Wounded WAACs’, The Times, 10 June 1918.

  106. 106.

    ‘A Hostel for Demobilised War Workers’, Daily Mail, 21 January 1919.

  107. 107.

    ‘Queen Filmed for Film on Women’s Work’, Daily Mail, 3 December 1918; ‘The Queen’s Cup for Women’, Daily Mail, 2 April 1919. See also Watson, Fighting Different Wars.

Select Bibliography

  • Adrian Gregory (2008) The Last Great War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catriona Pennell (2012) A Kingdom United: Popular Responses to the Outbreak of the First World War in Britain and Ireland (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Duff (1985) Queen Mary (London: Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Llewellyn (2010) The First Lady of Mulberry Walk: The Life and Times of Irish Sculptress Anne Acheson (Leicester: Matador Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Patterson (2012) The Search for Negotiated Peace: Women’s Activism and Citizen Diplomacy in World War I (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deborah Thom (2010) Nice Girls and Rude Girls (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Prochaska (1995) Royal Bounty: The Making of a Welfare Monarchy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gail Braybon (2012) Women Workers in the First World War (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrey Wakeford (1971) Three Consort Queens: Adelaide, Alexandra and Mary (London: Hale).

    Google Scholar 

  • George Robb (2014) British Culture and the First World War (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry Holloway (2007) Women and Work in Britain Since 1840 (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen Jones (2014) Women in British Public Life 1914–1950: Gender, Power and Social Policy (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janet Watson (2004) Fighting Different Wars: Experience, Memory and the First World War in Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Bethke Elshtain (1998) Women and War (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • June Purvis (2003) Emmeline Pankhurst. A Biography (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggie Andrews and Janis Lomas, eds (2014) The Home Front in Britain: Images, Myths and Forgotten Experiences since 1904 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew Glencross, Judith Rowbotham and Michael Kandiah, eds, The Windsor Dynasty: Long to Reign Over Us? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew Hendley (2012) Organised Patriotism and the Crucible of War (Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Millicent Fawcett (1923) The Women’s Victory – And After. Personal Reminiscences 1911–1918 (London: Sidgwick and Jackson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paula Bartley (2016) Queen Victoria (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Grant (2014) Philanthropy and Voluntary Action in the First World War: Mobilising Charity (Basingstoke: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samantha Philo-Gill (2017) The Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps in France 1917–21. Women Urgently Wanted (Barnsley: Pen and Sword).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandra Houlton and June Purvis, eds (2002) Votes for Women (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan Greyzel (2013) Women and the First World War (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybil Oldfield, ed. This Working Day World: Women’s Lives and Culture(s) in Britain 1914–1945 (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivien Newman (2014) We Also Served: The Forgotten Women of the First World War (Barnsley: Pen and Sword).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Rowbotham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rowbotham, J. (2018). ‘How To Be Useful in War Time’ Queen Mary’s Leadership in the War Effort 1914–1918. In: Glencross, M., Rowbotham, J. (eds) Monarchies and the Great War. Palgrave Studies in Modern Monarchy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89515-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89515-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89514-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89515-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics