Skip to main content

Forget the “Nobody-Knows-Anything” Mantra: It’s Time for Entertainment Science!

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 119k Accesses

Abstract

When it comes to success for entertainment products, William Goldman famously quipped, “Nobody Knows Anything.” You’ve either got the gift—artistic and managerial intuition—or you don’t. This view has permeated entertainment for years and has suggested that scientific insights is less relevant for managing entertainment than for other industries in which it is used to create and market products. Today’s “big data analytics” revolution is seen by many as an alternative to managerial intuition. So which is the best way forward for creating successful entertainment products in the age of big data? We argue that the right path is a careful integration of intuition and analytics, building on the strengths of each and compensating for the weaknesses. We show that analytics also needs powerful theory to be effective, as empirical results and predictions will otherwise be misleading and useless. Entertainment Science fuses managerial intuition with data analytics and theory, suggesting a new path for the thoughtful entertainment manager.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Art De Vany’s reference to the Goldman idea is sometimes used as an academic fig leaf by industry managers who despise the use of analytical approaches. It, however, contrasts strongly with De Vany’s role as one of the “founding fathers” of empirical entertainment research, who studied the creative industry’s patterns and “rules” extensively with ambitious mathematical and statistical tools (De Vany [2004] offers a summary of his work). De Vany also used his insights as a consultant for movie producers via his firm, Extremal Film Partners (see, e.g., Indiewire Team 2011).

  2. 2.

    “Sabermetrics” was brought to prominence in the landmark book “Historical Baseball Abstract” by James (1985), in which the author uses historical data from the Society for American Baseball Research (SABR, hence “saber”) and applied advanced statistical analyses to identify the 100 top players in history at each baseball position.

  3. 3.

    Specifically, the econometric model was fed with information on advertising spending, the artist’s previous performance (a kind of “star power”), and the song itself.

  4. 4.

    Michel Clement’s paper (2004) marks a notable exception—in German though.

  5. 5.

    One of the problems of deviation metrics such as MAPE is that percentage deviations are systematically higher for smaller values of the dependent variable than for greater values. One approach to correct this is to weigh the cases. When we do so in our example, using the ad spending per movie as weight, the MAPE shrinks to 43% (from 58%). See also our discussion of prediction measures in the context of innovation management for entertainment.

  6. 6.

    This remains the case, by the way, when we adjust the R2 for the number of IVs—this adjusted R2 value rises from 0.59 to 0.76.

  7. 7.

    The same would happen if you would try to explain the extraordinary success of James Cameron’s Titanic as part of a sample of less successful films and include “Lead-actor-says-‘I-am-the-king-of-the-world’-while-standing-on-large-ship” as an IV.

  8. 8.

    Vigen (2015, p. 29) offers a colorful example when citing very high correlations between murder rates and ice cream consumption. So which ice cream ingredient turns us into killers? None, at least as far as we (and food scientists) know. Instead, the season is the omitted variable here: murders are more common in the summer, which is when people usually eat ice cream. Thus, any attempt to ban ice cream to reduce murder rates would turn out to be quite ineffective…

  9. 9.

    For readers who want to dive deeper into the method dimension of Entertainment Science, there is an abundance of good books about regression analysis and its extensions. For beginners, we recommend Hair Jr. et al.’s (2014) book, which covers the fundamentals of regression analysis, along with other statistical methods, in a way that is both highly competent and readable. For advanced topics and questions on regression analysis, we suggest the work of Angrist and Pischke (2009), who devote detailed attention to most of the pitfall issues we have listed here—as well as many others.

References

  • Amatriain, X., & Basilico, J. (2012a). Netflix recommendations: Beyond the 5 stars (Part 2). The Netflix Tech Blog, June 20, https://goo.gl/N6QNK9.

  • Amatriain, X., & Basilico, J. (2012b). Netflix recommendations: Beyond the 5 stars (Part 1). The Netflix Technology Blog, April 5, https://goo.gl/6ur2Qs.

  • Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired, June 23, https://goo.gl/usVwdK.

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, S. (2009). Marken aus der Manufaktur: Filme für das 21. Jahrhundert. In T. Hennig-Thurau & V. Henning (Eds.), Guru Talk – Die deutsche Filmindustrie im 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 47–63). Marburg: Schüren Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, B. A. (1989). Immediate seating: A look at movie audiences. California: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (2013). Solving equation of a hit film script, with data. The New York Times, May 5, https://goo.gl/S5RvQt.

  • Bart, P. (2017). Peter Bart: Amazon raises bet on movie business, but rivals still baffled about long-term strategy. Deadline, March 10, https://goo.gl/t46Vvj.

  • Beier, L.-O. (2016). Instinkt. Geschmack. Eier. Der Spiegel, February 27, https://goo.gl/r5dKPH.

  • Brodnig, I. (2015). Netflix-Produktchef Neil Hunt: ‘Ich weiß das alles über Sie’. profil, December 11, https://goo.gl/TSHFgD.

  • Caldwell, J. T. (2008). Production culture: Industrial reflexivity and critical practice in film and television. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catmull, Ed. (2008). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard Business Review, 86, 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. (2004). Erfolgsfaktoren von Spielfilmen im Kino – Eine Übersicht der empirischen betriebswirtschaftlichen Literatur. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52, 250–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, P. (2007). InsightOut: Blick auf digitales Kino und Verwertungskette insgesamt. Film-TV-Video.de, April 2, https://goo.gl/p432yW.

  • De Vany, A. (2004). Hollywood economics: How extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A. (2006). The movies. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 615–665). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, D. (2016). Welcome to Magenta! Magenta, June 1, https://goo.gl/gWNt8B.

  • Friend, T. (2016). The mogul of the middle. The New Yorker, January 11, https://goo.gl/8hYXxT.

  • Gladwell, M. (2006). Annals of entertainment: The formula. The New Yorker, October 9, https://goo.gl/x9e7qD.

  • Goldman, W. (1983). Adventures in the screen trade. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Uribe, C. A., & Hunt, N. (2015). The Netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 6, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indiewire Team (2011). Show me the money: Extremal Film Partners pitches a new financing product. September 7, https://goo.gl/U3NLkE.

  • Jaafar, A. (2016). The king of Cannes Mario Kassar on the glory days of Carolco, why buying Arnie a plane made sense and talking vaginas. Deadline Hollywood, May 12, https://goo.gl/eoW3fz.

  • James, B. (1985). The Bill James historical baseball abstract. New York: Villard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordanous, A. (2016). Has computational creativity successfully made it ‘Beyond the Fence’ in musical theatre? Conference Paper, University of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, H. (2014). Music business plays to big data’s beat. The Wall Street Journal, December 14, https://goo.gl/Rc3Tv7.

  • Litman, B. R., & Kohl, L. S. (1989). Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The 80’s experience. Journal of Media Economics, 2, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, C., & Holloway, D. (2017). Jeff Bezos mandates programming shift at Amazon Studios. Variety, September 8, https://goo.gl/GFtV37.

  • Liu, X., Shi, S., Teixeira, T., & Wedel, M. (2018). Video content marketing: The making of clips. Journal of Marketing, 82, 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. (2009). Netflix awards $1 million prize and starts a new contest. The New York Times, September 21, https://goo.gl/ZX38Up.

  • McCarthy, E. J. (1960). Basic marketing: A managerial approach. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. B. (2008). Why popcorn costs so much at the movies. Leipzig: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediabiz (2016). Jeffrey Katzenbergs Gedankenspiele um Paramount. March 3, https://goo.gl/Fn1TNA.

  • Moon, S., & Song, R. (2015). The roles of cultural elements in international retailing of cultural products: An application to the motion picture industry. Journal of Retailing, 91, 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newitz, A. (2016). Movie written by algorithm turns out to be hilarious and intense. Ars Technica, June 9, https://goo.gl/3RrB5n.

  • Nocera, J. (2016). Can Netflix survive in the new world it created? The New York Times Magazine, June 15, https://goo.gl/e1d2Zu.

  • Peltoniemi, M. (2015). Cultural industries: Product-market characteristics, management challenges and industry dynamics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, P. (2016). Nimm einen Hund rein. Die Zeit, April 22, https://goo.gl/pKVQ7o.

  • Seifert, M., & Hadida, A. L. (2013). On the relative importance of linear model and human judge(s) in combined forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, K. (2015). Mercedes-Rechenfehler in Monaco: ‘Wie zum Teufel konnte das passieren?’ Spiegel Online, May 25, https://goo.gl/K8HLRy.

  • The Economist (2016). Silver-screen playbook: How to make a hit film. February 27, https://goo.gl/J7daa7.

  • Thompson, D. (2014). The Shazam effect. The Atlantic, December, https://goo.gl/LasX8e.

  • Thompson, P., Jones, M., & Warhurst, C. (2007). From conception to consumption: Creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickld (2016). 31 Fascinating things most people don’t know about Netflix. https://goo.gl/8pNw7X.

  • Vance, A. (2013). Netflix, Reed Hastings survive missteps to join Silicon Valley’s elite. Business Week, May 10, https://goo.gl/ss45xZ.

  • Variety (2014). Variety launches Vscore to measure actors’ value. August 6, https://goo.gl/9W6tE7.

  • Vigen, T. (2015). Spurious correlations. New York: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2016). OMG! Analytics didn’t work! LinkedIn, February 25 https://goo.gl/2s2rNW.

  • Wallace, B. (2016). The epic fail of Hollywood’s hottest algorithm. Vulture, https://goo.gl/QbEYiK.

  • Zafirau, S. (2009). Audience knowledge and the everyday lives of cultural producers in Hollywood. In V. Mayer, M. J. Banks, & J. T. Caldwell (Eds.), Production studies: Cultural studies of media industries (pp. 190–202).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, C. (2016). In science, it’s never ‘Just a Theory’. The New York Times, April 8, https://goo.gl/dker2P.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Hennig-Thurau .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hennig-Thurau, T., Houston, M.B. (2019). Forget the “Nobody-Knows-Anything” Mantra: It’s Time for Entertainment Science!. In: Entertainment Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89292-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics