Abstract
While varicocele is considered to be a predominantly left-sided disease in 90% cases, the existence and implication of a contralateral varicocele over the right side, whether low grade or subclinical, are being largely overlooked. The concept of unilateral left varicocele exerting influence only on the ipsilateral testis could not sufficiently explain the overall decline in fertility as observed in infertile patients with varicocele. The lack of efficacy after varicocele repair in a significant number of patients represents another pitfall in the current practice. The deleterious effect of a left varicocele over the right testis has been shown in the absence of a varicocele over the right side. In addition, the high prevalence of a concomitant low-grade or subclinical right varicoceles in the presence of a clinical left varicocele represents another piece of evidence supporting the notion that varicocele may be a bilateral disease. Moreover, bilateral varicocelectomy resulted in better improvement in semen parameters in patients with clinical varicocele on one side with a contralateral low-grade or subclinical varicocele compared to unilateral varicocele repair. Although the conceptualization of varicocele as a bilateral disease seems reasonable, large-scale well-designed studies are eagerly required to further validate this hypothesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, Weidner W, Zini A. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60:796–808.
McDougal WS, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin A, Peters AG. Campbell-Walsh urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2016. p. 146.
American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Report on varicocele and infertility: an AUA Best Practice Policy and ASRM Practice Committee Report. American Urological Association, Inc; Birmingham: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; 2001.
Lee PA, Coughlin MT. The single testis: paternity after presentation as unilateral cryptorchidism. J Urol. 2002;168(4):1680–2.
Gat Y, Bachar GN, Zukerman Z, Belenky A, Gornish M. Varicocele: a bilateral disease. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:424–9.
McClure RD, Hricak H. Scrotal ultrasound in the infertile man: detection of subclinical unilateral and bilateral varicoceles. J Urol. 1986;135:711–5.
Sun XL, Wang JL, Peng YP, Gao QQ, Song T, Yu W, Xu ZP, Chen Y, Dai YT. Bilateral is superior to unilateral varicocelectomy in infertile males with left clinical and right subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(2):205–10.
Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21(8):606–9.
Dubin L, Hotchkiss RS. Testis biopsy in subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1969;20:51–7.
Saleh R, Mahfouz RZ, Agarwal A, Farouk H. Histopathologic patterns of testicular biopsies in infertile azoospermic men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2482–5, 5.e1-2.
Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, Duce MN, Bozlu M. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int. 2000;86:490–3.
Pfeiffer D, Berger J, Schoop C, Tauber R. A Doppler-based study on the prevalence of varicocele in German children and adolescents. Andrologia. 2006;38:13–9.
Woldu S, Nees S, Van Batavia J, Spencer B, Glassberg K. Physical exam and ultrasound characteristics of right varicocoeles in adolescents with left varicocoeles. Andrology. 2013;1(6):936–42.
Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, Miyake K, Ishigaki T. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol. 1996;155(5):1636–8.
Unal D, Yeni E, Verit A, Karatas OF. Clomiphene citrate versus varicocelectomy in treatment of subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized study. Int J Urol. 2001;8(5):227–30.
Kohn TP, Ohlander SJ, Jacob JS, Griffin TM, Lipshultz LI, Pastuszak AW. The effect of subclinical varicocele on pregnancy rates and semen parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(7):53.
Cervellione RM, Corroppolo M, Bianchi A. Subclinical varicocele in the pediatric age group. J Urol. 2008;179:717–9.
Zampieri N, Dall’Agnola A. Subclinical varicocele and sports: a longitudinal study. Urology. 2011;77:1199–202.
Amelar RD, Dubin L. Right varicocelectomy in selected infertile patients who have failed to improve after previous left varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(5):833–7.
Lemack GE, Uzzo RG, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Microsurgical repair of the adolescent varicocele. J Urol. 1998;160:179–81.
Scherr D, Goldstein M. Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral varicocelectomy in men with palpable bilateral varicoceles. J Urol. 1999;162:85–8.
Libman J, Jarvi K, Lo K, Zini A. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy is superior for men with bilateral versus unilateral repair. J Urol. 2006;176:2602–5.
Baazeem A, Boman JM, Libman J, Jarvi K, Zini A. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for infertile men with oligospermia: differential effect of bilateral and unilateral varicocele on pregnancy outcomes. BJU Int. 2009;104:524–8.
Elbendary MA, Elbadry AM. Right subclinical varicocele: how to manage in infertile patients with clinical left varicocele? Fertil Steril. 2009;92(6):2050–3.
Zheng YQ, Gao X, Li ZJ, Yu YL, Zhang ZG, Li W. Efficacy of bilateral and left varicocelectomy in infertile men with left clinical and right subclinical varicoceles: a comparative study. Urology. 2009;73(6):1236–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiu, P.KF., Cho, CL. (2019). Is Varicocele a Bilateral Disease?. In: Esteves, S., Cho, CL., Majzoub, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79101-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79102-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)