Skip to main content

Varicocele and Orchialgia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varicocele and Male Infertility

Abstract

A varicocele is the abnormal dilation and tortuosity of the pampiniform plexus of veins in the spermatic cord. Varicoceles affect approximately 15% of the male population. While the majority of men with varicoceles are asymptomatic, about 10% of patients may experience pain. The pain associated with varicoceles is typically restricted to the ipsilateral scrotum, is described as dull and achy, and is typically exacerbated by prolonged periods of standing or activity. A varicocele implicated as the etiology of chronic orchialgia is a diagnosis of exclusion, and a thorough history and physical examination must be performed to rule out other causes of pain, paying particular attention to atypical signs or symptoms. Adjunctive studies such as urinalysis and urine culture should be obtained if indicated. Though imaging is not necessary or indicated for the diagnosis of varicocele, several imaging modalities including ultrasound, CT, and MRI are often useful in the evaluation of other potential causes of chronic orchialgia. Additionally, given the known effect of varicoceles on fertility, a thorough sexual and reproductive history should be obtained, and a fertility evaluation should be offered. Initial management for suspected varicocele-related orchialgia should be aimed at conservative measures, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) drugs or medications, scrotal support, activity limitations, and a 6-month-long period of observation to allow other sources of pain to present themselves or resolve. If conservative measures fail to adequately manage the pain, or if activity limitations are not feasible, procedural intervention may be indicated. While the microsurgical subinguinal approach is the gold standard, surgical repair has been shown to be effective in treating varicocele-related chronic orchialgia, regardless of approach, with approximately 90% of patients experiencing significant improvement or complete resolution of pain with infrequent and mild complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lomboy JR, Coward RM. The varicocele: clinical presentation, evaluation, and surgical management. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016;33(3):163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomason AM, Fariss BL. The prevalence of varicoceles in a group of healthy young men. Mil Med. 1979;144(3):181–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Damsgaard J. Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels: a study of 7035 healthy young men from six European countries. Eur Urol. 2016;70:1019–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(3):613–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Witt M. Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain. J Urol. 1998;42:541–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson AC, Lance RS, Ruiz HE. Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain. J Urol. 1998;159(5):1565–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parekattil SJ, Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt JV, Priola KB, Vieweg J, Allan RW. Trifecta nerve complex: potential anatomical basis for microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for chronic orchialgia. J Urol. 2013;190(1):265–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Evolving approach to the varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35(2):183–9, viii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1556–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amelar RD, Dubin L. Therapeutic implications of left, right, and bilateral varicocelectomy. Urology. 1987;30(1):53–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21(8):606–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benson JS, Abern MR, Larsen S, Levine LA. Does a positive response to spermatic cord block predict response to microdenervation of the spermatic cord for chronic scrotal content pain? J Sex Med. 2013;10(3):876–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levine LA, Matkov TG. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord as primary surgical treatment of chronic orchialgia. J Urol. 2001;165(6):1927–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yaman Ö, Özdi̇ler E, Anafarta K, Göğüş O. Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Urology. 2000;55(1):107–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen S-S. Factors predicting symptomatic relief by varicocelectomy in patients with normospermia and painful varicocele nonresponsive to conservative treatment. Urology. 2012;80(3):585–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological A, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive M. Report on varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(Suppl 1):S142–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park HJ, Lee SS, Park NC. Predictors of pain resolution after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(5):754–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abd Ellatif ME, Asker W, Abbas A, Negm A, Al-Katary M, El-Kaffas H, et al. Varicocelectomy to treat pain, and predictors of success: a prospective study. Curr Urol. 2012;6(1):33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Altunoluk B, Soylemez H, Efe E, Malkoc O. Duration of preoperative scrotal pain may predict the success of microsurgical varicocelectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36(1):55–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang H, Liu X-P, Yang X-J, Huang W-T, Ruan X-X, Xiao H-J, et al. Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference? Asian J Androl. 2014;16(1):112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo L, Sun W, Shao G, Song H, Ge N, Zhao S, et al. Outcomes of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy with and without the assistance of Doppler ultrasound: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2015;86(5):922–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marmar J, Kim Y. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SO, Jung H, Park K. Outcomes of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles. J Androl. 2012;33(5):872–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kenan K, Temuçin Ş, Kadir B, Ferhat A, Cüneyd I, Doğan E. Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain. Int J Urol. 2005;12(5):484–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kachrilas S, Popov E, Bourdoumis A, Akhter W, El Howairis M, Aghaways I, et al. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain. JSLS. 2014;18(3):e2014.00302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maghraby HA. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles: merits and outcomes. J Endourol. 2002;16(2):107–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chawla A, Kulkarni G, Kamal K, Zini A. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for recurrent or persistent varicoceles associated with orchalgia. Urology. 2005;66(5):1072–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cassidy D, Jarvi K, Grober E, Lo K. Varicocele surgery or embolization: which is better? Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6(4):266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdulmaaboud MR, Shokeir AA, Farage Y, El-Rahman AA, El-Rakhawy MM, Mutabagani H. Treatment of varicocele: a comparative study of conventional open surgery, percutaneous retrograde sclerotherapy, and laparoscopy. Urology. 1998;52(2):294–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Puche-Sanz I, Floes-Martín J, Vázquez-Alonso F, Pardo-Moreno P, Cózar-Olmo J. Primary treatment of painful varicocoele through percutaneous retrograde embolization with fibred coils. Andrology. 2014;2(5):716–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Halpern J, Mittal S, Pereira K, Bhatia S, Ramasamy R. Percutaneous embolization of varicocele: technique, indications, relative contraindications, and complications. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tung M-C, Huang WJ, Chen K-K. Modified subinguinal varicocelectomy for painful varicocele and varicocele-associated infertility. J Chin Med Assoc. 2004;67(6):296–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Parekattil SJ, Brahmbhatt JV. Robotic approaches for male infertility and chronic orchialgia microsurgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21(6):493–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCormick, B.J., Coward, R.M. (2019). Varicocele and Orchialgia. In: Esteves, S., Cho, CL., Majzoub, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79101-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79102-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics