Skip to main content

Imputation Methods for Single Variables

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Survey Methodology and Missing Data
  • 2716 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers imputation methods for single variables. Naturally, it may be necessary to impute the values of several variables in each dataset and to carry out several imputations for each dataset. It is essential to understand the basics of Chap. 11, which presents the starting point for imputation methods. It is helpful to look at that chapter for the core terms, but an important question is also why one should, or should not, use imputation. Before answering this question, it is necessary to analyse the missingness and the reasons for it thoroughly. Then again, it is good to remember that the imputation methodology always depends on the case; thus, each variable should be separately imputed even though the principles of the method used can be similar. Successful imputation therefore is ‘tailored’ to the specific case, and the best results are obtained if the ‘imputation team’ has sound knowledge of the basis of the data and its quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, B. D. (2005). Imputation of categorical variables with PROC MI. In SUGI 30 Proceedings. Retrieved February 2015, from http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/113-30.pdf

  • Björnstad, J. (2007). Non-Bayesian multiple imputation. Journal of Official Statistics, 23, 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., & Kenward, M. (2013). Multiple imputation and its application. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. L., Hoogland, J., Laaksonen, S., Mesa, D. M., Pannekoek, J., Piela, P., et al. (2001). The AUTIMP-Project: Evaluation of imputation software. Research Paper 0122. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, S. (2000). Regression-based nearest neighbor hot decking. Computational Statistics, 15, 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, S. (2003). Alternative imputation techniques for complex metric variables. Journal of Applied Statistics, 30, 1009–1020.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, S. (2016a). Multiple imputation for a continuous variable. Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Science, 2016, 624–643. Science Signpost Publishing, Newark, DE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, S. (2016b). A new framework for multiple imputation and applications to a binary variable. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 11, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, S. & Piela, P. (2003). Integrated modelling approach to imputation. In Euredit Project Documents. Standard Methods, D512 StatFI. Retrieved October 2004, from http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/euredit/)

  • Laaksonen, S., Rässler, S., & Skinner, C. (2004). Documentation of pseudo code of imputation methods for the simulation study. In DACSEIS Project Research Papers under Workpackage 11.2 ‘Imputation and Nonresponse’. Retrieved March 2004, from www.dacseis.de/deliverables

  • Lago, L. P., & Clark, R. G. (2015). Imputation of household survey data using linear mixed models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 57, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12108.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, J. F., & Rueda, M. M. (2009). New imputation methods for missing data using quantiles. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 232, 305–317.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • SAS/STAT 9.3 (2011). Help and Documentation, Users’ Guide for the MI Procedure. Details. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, H. (2003). Appendix B: data sets and perturbations. In Euredit project, vol. 2. Retrieved October 2004, from http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/euredit/)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laaksonen, S. (2018). Imputation Methods for Single Variables. In: Survey Methodology and Missing Data. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79011-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics