Abstract
There have been significant problems in precisely defining cultural competence and cultural sensitivity in applied psychology. This chapter examines definitional issues related to this problem and suggests that these constructs rest, at least partially, on an ethical premise. This may account for the paucity of empirical evaluation as ethical claims (when viewed deontically or from the perspective of virtue ethics) may not be decided on empirical grounds. Although these constructs may have empirical dimensions, significant paradoxes and contradictions continue to exist.
I would like to acknowledge Caroline Cummings for her helpful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.
Armstrong, E. G. (2001). Gangsta misogyny: A content analysis of the portrayals of violence against women in rap music, 1987–1993. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 8(2), 96–126.
Benuto, L. T., Casas, J., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2018). Training culturally competent psychologists: A systematic review of the training outcome literature. Training and Education in Professional Psychology.
Cummings, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Cummings, J. (Eds.). (2009). Psychology’s war on religion. Phoenix, AZ: Zweig, Tucker & Thiess.
Frisby, C. (2013). Meeting the psych educational needs of minority students. New York: Wiley.
Gonzalez, O. R. (2010). Tracking the bug chaser: Giving the gift of HIV/AIDS. Cultural Critique, 75, 82–113.
Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. New York: Hackett
Lauran, L. (1978). Progress and its problems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
McKinnon, C. (1987). Pleasure under patriarch. In: J. Geer & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality. Englewood Cliffs: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MacKinnon, C. (1987). Pleasure under patriarchy. In J. H. Geer & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality. New York: Plenum.
O’Donohue, W., & Levensky, E. (1992). Handbook of forensic psychology. New York: Academic Press.
O’Donohue, W. (2016). Oppression, privilege, bias, prejudice, & stereotyping: Problems in the APA Code of Ethics. Ethics and Behavior, 26(7), 527–544.
O’Donohue, W., & Benuto, L. (2010). The many problems of cultural sensitivity. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 7(2), 34–37.
Paul, G. L. (1969). Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In: C. M. Franks (Ed.), Behavior therapy: Appraisal and status (pp. 29–62). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sowell, T. (1996). The vision of the anointed. New York: Basic Books.
Sue, D. et al (2007). Racial microagressions in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286.
Zaitchik, M. C., & Mosher, D. L. (1993). Criminal justice implications of the macho personality constellation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(3), 227–239.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Donohue, W. (2018). Cultural Competence and Sensitivity in Applied Psychology: Ethical and Scientific Problems. In: Frisby, C., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Cultural Competence in Applied Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78997-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78997-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78995-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78997-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)