Abstract
Among the many uses of meta-analyses, it has become an increasingly relevant tool in the assessment of intervention for diseases. This chapter aims to outline the key points in conducting an intervention meta-analysis and explains how to make sense of the results of meta-analyses in understanding the effects of intervention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Scott A, Wolchok J, Old L. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:278–87.
Mohiuddin K, Swanson S. Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:315–9.
Abbott R, Cohen M. Medico-legal issues in cardiology. Cardiol Rev. 2013;21:222–8.
Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 29 June 2018.
Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L, Ahmad N, Aim F, Nizard R, Ravaud P. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2014;259:18–25.
Sedgwick P. Odds and odds ratios. BMJ. 2013;347:f5067.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benedetto, U., Ng, C. (2018). Transition to Intervention Meta-Analysis. In: Biondi-Zoccai, G. (eds) Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78966-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78966-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78965-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78966-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)