Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Prolapse Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 810 Accesses

Abstract

Laparoscopic urogynaecology has become increasingly popular over the past decade. When offering these procedures it is important to offer the full range of non surgical as well as appropriate surgical alternatives. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence has issued clear guidance on performing these procedures. Adequate training, working within an MDT and appropriate consent are the cornerstones of treatment and compliance with clinical governance advised. This chapter deals with litigation in relation to laparoscopic urogynaecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma D, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL. Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:555.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al O, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ismail S, Duckett J, Rizk D, et al. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: international Urogynaecological research and development committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1619–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg583.

  6. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg584.

  7. Leron E, Stanton SL. Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG. 2001;108(6):629–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. General Medical Counsel. Good medical Practice and Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vilos GA. Laparoscopic bowel injuries: forty litigated gynaecological cases in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24:224–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elneil S, Cutner AS, Remy M, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. BJOG. 2005;112(4):486–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jackson, S. (2018). Laparoscopic Prolapse Surgery. In: Jha, S., Ferriman, E. (eds) Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78682-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78683-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics