Skip to main content

General Anaesthesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • 830 Accesses

Abstract

General anaesthesia for obstetric anaesthesia has declined however litigation has increased. Recognised standards exist to reduce the chance of complications which must be adhered to. Common reasons for litigation include awareness under general anaesthesia, harm from failed intubation which may include hypoxic injury to the patient and the fetus. Significant harm also occurs from aspiration, hypertensive intracranial haemorrhage and nerve injury under anaesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davies JM. Obstetric anaesthesia closed claims: trends over the last three decades. ASA Newsl. 2004;68(6):12–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pandit JJ, Cook TM, the NAP5 Steering Panel. NAP5. Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. London, The Royal College of Anaesthetists and Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland; 2014. ISBN: 978-1-900936-11-8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kinsella SM, Winton AL, Mushambi MC, Ramaswamy K, Swales H, Quinn AC, Popat M. Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 2015;24:356–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies JM, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW, Domino KB. Liability associated with obstetric anaesthesia a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(1):131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashpole KJ, Cook TM. Correspondence: litigation in obstetric general anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:529–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Consent for anaesthesia 2017. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. The anaesthesia team AAGBI. 2010. https://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/anaesthesia_team_2010_0.pdf.

  9. England and Wales High Court (Queens Bench Division) Decisions Cornish & Anor, R. v (rev 1) [2016] EWHC 799 (QB) (15 April 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association. GA For Caesarean Section. Online. http://www.oaa-anaes.ac.uk/ui/content/content.aspx?id=180. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.

  11. Mihai R, Scott S, Cook TM. Litigation related to inadequate anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:829–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. NICE (National Institute For Health And Care Excellence) Depth Of Anaesthesia Monitors BiSpectral Index (BIS), E-Entropy and Narcotrend-Compact-M. DG6. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adams JP, Bell MDD, Bodenham AR. Quality and outcomes in anaesthesia lessons from litigation. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(1):110–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(1):i68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, O’Sulivan EP, Woodall NM. Difficult airway society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(6):827–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mushambi SM, Kinsella SM, Popat M, Swales H, Ramaswamy KK, Winton AL, Quinn AC. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(11):1286–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner JA. Diagnosis and management of pre eclampsia an update. Int J Women’s Health. 2010;2:2327–37.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knight M, Nair M, Tuffnell D, Kenyon S, Shakespeare J, Brocklehurst P, Kurinczuk JJ (Eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving mothers’ care: surveillance of maternal deaths in the UK 2012–14 and lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Con dential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–14. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McGlennan A, Mustafa A. General anaesthesia for caesarean section. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9(5):148–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook TM, Scott S, Mihai R. Litigation related to airway and respiratory complications of anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:556–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngan Kee WD. Editorial: confidential enquiries into maternal deaths: 50 years of closing the loop. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(4):413–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Crawforth K. The ANAA foundation closed malpractice claims study: obstetric anaesthesia. ANAA J. 2002;70(2):97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McClure JH, Cooper GM, Saving Mothers C-BTH. Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(2):127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferner RE. Medication errors that have led to manslaughter charges. BMJ. 2000;321:1212–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Warner MA, Warner ME, Martin JT. Ulnar neuropathy. incidence, outcome and risk factors in sedated or anaesthetised patients. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(6):1332–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Warner MA, Martin JT, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Chute CG. Lower-extremity motor neuropathy associated with surgery performed on patients in a lithotomy position. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:6–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Scottish Courts and Tribunals (Outer House, Court of Session) Decisions Thompson, G v Lothian Health Board [2000] 0768/5/1995 (20 April 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cooper GM, McClure JH. Anaesthesia chapter from saving mothers’ lives; reviewing maternal deaths to make pregnancy safer. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(1):17–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Hird .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hird, S., Iqbal, R. (2018). General Anaesthesia. In: Jha, S., Ferriman, E. (eds) Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78682-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78683-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics