Abstract
This volume has examined six cases of university engagement in peripheral regions. While these regions have often been overlooked in the mainstream literature on university-region dynamics because they do not readily offer up success stories, they do facilitate an exploration into the challenges and difficulties that arise at the intersection of the university and region. Beginning with a theory rooted in institutionalist literature that depicts the university as a set of five ambiguities rather than as a coherent whole, the chapters have sought to apply the ambiguities of intention, causality, history, structure, and meaning to their regional context. In this conclusion, we pull together all six case studies, showing how each of them dissects and analyzes one or more of these ambiguities through a complementary theory, and in so doing delves deeply in the inter-nested and co-evolving systems of university, region, industry, and policy. We argue further that by engaging with a wide range of complementary theories to interrogate these ambiguities and by providing insights valuable for both academics and practitioners, the volume as a whole represents an application of the methodology of analytic eclecticism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colelle, M., & Sapir, A. (2008). Higher aspirations: An agenda for reforming European universities. Retrieved from Brussels http://bruegel.org/2008/06/higher-aspirations-an-agenda-for-reforming-european-universities/
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE.
Benneworth, P., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Asheim, B. (2009). Exploring the multiple roles of Lund university in strengthening Scania’s regional innovation system: Towards institutional learning? European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1645–1664.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.
Berg, L., & Pinheiro, R. (2016). Handling different institutional logics in the public sector: Comparing management in Norwegian universities and hospitals. In R. Pinheiro, F. Ramirez, K. Vrabæk, & L. Geschwind (Eds.), Towards a comparative institutionalism: Forms, dynamics and logics across health care and higher education fields: Vol. Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 145–168). Bingley: Emerald.
Boschma, R. (2007). Path creation, path dependence and regional development. Path Dependence and the Evolution of City Regional Economies, Working Paper Series, 197, 40–55.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). The ashgate research companion to new public management. Surrey: Ashgate.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
Drucker, J., & Goldstein, H. (2007). Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 20–46.
Enders, J., Kehm, B., & Schimank, U. (2015). Turning universities into actors on quasi-markets: How new public management reforms affect academic research. In D. Jansen & I. Pruisken (Eds.), The changing governance of higher education and research higher education dynamics (pp. 89–103). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
European Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research, and innovation. COM (2006) 208 final.
Florida, R. (2006). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. Liberal Education, 92(3), 22–29.
Geschwind, L., & Pinheiro, R. M. (2017). Raising the summit or flattening the agora? The elitist turn in science policy in Northern Europe. Journal of Baltic Studies, 48(4), 1–16.
Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M., & Amaral, A. (2005). Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation. Consortium of higher education researchers. Conference proceedings. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. A. M. (2000). Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 267–285.
Hansen, H. F., Geschwind, L., Kivisto, J., Pekkola, E., Pinheiro, R., & Pulkkinen, K. (forthcoming). Balancing accountability and trust: Higher education reforms in the Nordic countries.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Springer.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huisman, J. (2009). International perspectives on the governance of higher education: Alternative frameworks for coordination. Routledge.
Isaksen, A. (2014). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Lester, R., & Sotarauta, M. (Eds.). (2007). Innovation, universities and the competitiveness of regions. Helsinki: Tekes.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.
Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
Oquist, G., & Benner, M. (2012). Fostering breakthrough research: A comparative study. Halmstad: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In I. Katznelson & H. Milne (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline Vol. Centennial (pp. 693–721). W. W. Norton & Company.
Pinheiro, R. (2012). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). Milton Park and New York: Routledge.
Pinheiro, R. (2014). Strategic change in the periphery: The case of the University of Oulu. In T. Aarrevaara & E. Berg (Eds.), Higher education and research in academe–Who should pay? Luleå: Luleå Tekniska Universitet.
Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (Eds.). (2016). Mergers in higher education: The experiences from Northern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pinheiro, R., Wengenge-Ouma, G., Balbachevsky, E., & Cai, Y. (2015). The role of higher education in society and the changing institutionalized features in higher education. In J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. Dill, & M. Souto-Otero (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance (pp. 225–242). London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinheiro, R., & Young, M. (2017). The university as an adaptive resilient organization: A complex systems perspective. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 119–136). Bingley: Emerald.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—New public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.
Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Beyond paradigms: Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Vang, J., & Asheim, B. (2006). Regions, absorptive capacity and strategic coupling with high-tech TNCs lessons from India and China. Science Technology Society, 11(1), 39–66.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
Young, M., Sørensen, M. P., Bloch, C., & Degn, L. (2017). Systemic rejection: Political pressures seen from the science system. Higher Education, 74(3), 491–505.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, M., Pinheiro, R., Šima, K. (2018). Conclusion: University Ambiguities and Analytic Eclecticism. In: Pinheiro, R., Young, M., Šima, K. (eds) Higher Education and Regional Development. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78643-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78643-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78642-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78643-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)