Abstract
This chapter contextualises the sport business marketplace. It begins by noting the radical expansion of the industry over the past few decades, from a modest amateur sector to an immense commercial powerhouse. Next, the chapter outlines sport’s remarkable and unique features from both an economic as well as a sociocultural perspective. In this respect, sport can inspire passion and people, it involves merchandise and money, supports ideology and identity, fosters community, enhances profile and professionalism, and generates sponsorship and symbolism. As a result—and as the motivation for this book—the right leadership, culture and innovative practices can create the foundation for social, cultural and commercial progress. The chapter also introduces several key concepts that permeate throughout all the chapters. In order to create a culture that enables innovation, attention has to be given to all aspects of innovation’s deployment. In particular, the book proposes that innovation must be considered within the context of a sport enterprise’s cultural perspective. Other themes address the necessity of bounded risk-taking, entrepreneurship, leadership, and the benefits that arise from an innovative culture. Finally, the chapter highlights the book’s culminating ‘Innovative Culture Framework’, which comprises the dimensions of (1) Leadership, (2) Aligning Business and Innovation Strategy, (3) Fostering Collaboration, (4) Reducing Fear of Failure and (5) Driving Openness to New Ideas. These dimensions provide the catalyst to foster a culture of innovation within sport enterprises to create new sport business trends and capture the resulting market opportunities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adner, R. (2016). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063166778451. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumer’s identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 171–184.
AT Kearney. (2014). Winning in the business of sports. https://www.atkearney.com/communications-media-technology/article?/a/winning-in-the-business-of-sports. Accessed 18 Oct 2017.
Bailey, J. (2014). The global sport ecosystem. New York: RSR Partners.
Basole, R. C. (2008). Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. In 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business (pp. 65–74). IEEE.
Belk, R. K. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
Belk, R. W. (1996). Hyperreality and globalization. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 8(3–4), 23–37.
Belk, R., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326–351.
Burrow, G. (2013). Not just a game: The impact of sports on U.S. economy. http://www.economicmodeling.com/2013/07/09/not-just-a-game-the-impact-of-sports-on-u-s-economy/. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
Cashman, K. (2013). 7 ways leaders can foster innovation. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevincashman/2013/08/21/7-ways-leaders-can-foster-innovation/#53ae220529a9. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Cave, A. (2015). Discover the potential of sport: A £20 billion industry. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/business-of-sport/potential-of-sport-20billion-industry/. Accessed 27 Nov 2017.
Compton, J., & Howard, D. (2002). The growth and financial status of professional sports in North America: Insights for English soccer leagues? Managing Leisure, 7(3), 145–163.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
Deloitte. (2017). Deloitte’s sports industry starting lineup: Trends expected to disrupt and dominate 2017. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/consumer-business/articles/sports-business-trends-disruption.html. Accessed 6 Nov 2017.
Downward, P., & Dawson, A. (2000). The economics of professional team sports. London: Routledge.
Hamel, G. (2007). The future of management (Harvard Business Review). Boston: Harvard Press.
Heitner, D. (2015). Sports industry to reach $73.5 billion by 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrenheitner/2015/10/19/sports-industry-to-reach-73-5-billion-by-2019/#3c52b5e91b4b. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
Hess, R., Nicholson, M., Stewart, B., & De Moore, G. (2008). A national game: A history of Australian rules football. Camberwell: Viking Penguin.
Hwang, V. W. (2014). Your secret weapon in business: Culture. https://www.forbes.com/sites/victorhwang/2014/06/08/your-secret-weapon-in-business-culture/#40b72e9547c0. Accessed 19 Oct 2016.
Kelly, E. (2015). Business ecosystems come of age – Introduction. Retrieved from https://dupress.deloitte.com/content/dam/dup-usen/articles/platform-strategy-new-level-business-trends/DUP_1048-Business-ecosystems-come-of-age_MASTER_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
KPMG Report. (2016). The business of sports: Playing to win the game. Confederation of Indian Industry, KPMG.
Maese, R. (2014). At World Cup, U.S. soccer fans converge by the thousands. https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/dcunited/at-world-cup-us-soccer-fans-converge-by-the-thousands/2014/06/21/188e90e8-f8ca-11e3-a606-946fd632f9f1_story.html?utm_term=.63b99cbcf22b. Accessed 14 Oct 2017.
Mason, R. (2015). Discover the potential of sport: A £20 billion industry. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/business-of-sport/potential-of-sport-20billion-industry/. Accessed 27 Nov 2017
Milton-Smith, J. (2002). Business ethics in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 131–142.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10126156.
Morgan, M. (2002). Optimising the structure of elite competitions in professional sport—Lessons from rugby union. Managing Leisure, 7(1), 41–46.
Nightengale, B. (2013, May 8). No joy in Wrigleyville as Cubs, neighbors clash. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/cubs/2013/05/08/chicago-cubs-want-to-renovate-99-year-old-wrigley-field/2145735/. Accessed 23 Nov 2017.
Noll, R. (2002). The economics of promotion and relegation in sports leagues: The case of English football. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(2), 169–203.
Oakley, B., & Green, M. (2001). The production of Olympic champions: International perspectives of elite sport development systems. European Journal for Sport Management, 8(1), 83–105.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Platow, M. J., Durante, M., Williams, N., Garrett, M., Walshe, J., Cincotta, S., Lianos, G., & Brautchu, A. (1999). The contributions of sport fan identity to the production of prosocial behaviour. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 3(20), 161–169.
Porter, M. (2004). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Rao, J., & Weintraub, J. (2013). How innovative is your company’s culture? https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-innovative-is-your-companys-culture/. Accessed 3 Nov 2017.
Ratneshwar, S., & Mick, D. (2005). Inside consumption: Consumer motives, goals and desires. Oxford: Routledge.
Ritzer, G. (1998). The McDonaldization thesis. London: Sage.
Schiuma, G. (2011). The value of arts for business. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schteiber, G. (2017). Sport has the power to change the world, Nelson Mandela. https://real-leaders.com/sport-has-the-power-to-change-the-worldnelson-mandela/. Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
Sherwood, D. (2002). Creating an innovative culture. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Skinner, J., & Smith, A. (2017). The uberization of the fitness industry. https://www.globalsportsjobs.com/article/the-uberization-of-the-fitness-industry/. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
Skinner, J., Stewart, B., & Edwards, A. (2003). The postmodernisation of rugby union in Australia. Journal of Football Studies, 6(1), 51–69.
Skinner, J., Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (2016). The evolution of anti-doping policy: Workplace implications for athletes. In M. Barry, J. Skinner, & T. Engelberg (Eds.), Research handbook of employment relations and sport. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Smith, A. C. T., & Stewart, B. (2010). The special features of sport: A critical revisit. Sport Management Review, 13(1), 1–13.
Stewart, R., & Smith, A. (1999). The special features of sport. Annals of Leisure Research, 2, 87–99.
Stewart, B., Smith, A., & Nicholson, M. (2003). Sport consumer typologies: A critical review. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(4), 206–216.
Stewart, B., Dickson, G., & Nicholson, M. (2005). The Australian Football League’s recent progress: A study in cartel conduct and monopoly power. Sport Management Review, 8(2), 145–166.
Syzmanski, S., & Kuypers, T. (1999). Winners and losers: The business strategy of football. Harmondsworth: Viking Press.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Timothy, D. J. (2005). Shopping, tourism retailing and leisure. Buffalo: Channel View Publications.
Weiller, C., & Neely, A. (2013). Business model design in an ecosystem context. Cambridge: Cambridge Service Alliance.
Winfree, J. A., & Rosentraub, M. (2012). Sport finance and management. Boca Raton: CRC Pres
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Case Study: Fostering Innovative Ecosystems—Under Armour
Case Study: Fostering Innovative Ecosystems—Under Armour
Under Armour was founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, a former football player at the University of Maryland. Plank used his entrepreneurial spirit to create something he personally needed, a sports shirt that didn’t make him ‘the sweatiest player on the football field’. Seeking wicking fabrics to wear on the field, rather than his sweat-laden cotton shirt, provided the impetus for Plank to establish the Under Armour brand . Plank experimented with underwear fabrics to find a light, cool fabric that would work on the field. The aim of the brand was to focus on performance wear for athletes, engineered lightweight clothing to keep athletes cool and dry throughout the course of a game, practice or workout. Under Armour uses complex technology to create diverse product ranges for men, women and youths. The brand offers HeatGear® when it’s hot, ColdGear® when it’s cold, and AllSeasonGear® between the extremes.
Whilst the brand is going from strength to strength, now taking 75% of the market share, inventing new fabrics and implementing technological advances and wearables into its product lines, perhaps the brand’s ability to foster a true environment of innovation is its real core strength. Under Armour positioned itself in the market place as high-quality apparel, the best available, using this positioning to establish its brand ethos. Under Armour challenged the norm and disrupted the marketplace, becoming a powerhouse in innovation in terms of marketing, sponsorship and branding, as well as fostering an environment of high performance as an innovative company ecosystem that stretches beyond their own company culture to the network of collaborators they create with.
Under Armour targets select athletes to market their campaigns; they push beyond their own brand to build a collaborative brand which incorporates the kind of athletes that resonate with their clothing lines. Whilst most sports apparel lines offer this link, Under Armour use innovation as the core of their values, it drives everything that they do. Marketing their brand to ‘overcoming obstacles’, encouraging consumers to be fearless and determined. These core values capture passion, intensity and drive. They successfully play the underdog card, a marketing strategy that has seen them compete equally with powerhouse brands such as Nike and Adidas, using their innovative edge to compete head-on in an already saturated market.
To foster this innovative culture, Under Armour built a unique brand strategy. In the early days Under Armour used lesser-known athletes to compete with Nike; in their first commercial they used Kevin Plank’s teammate from the University of Maryland to star in an ad for the brand . They fiercely championed the underdog. This drove the culture of ‘overcoming adversity’ and ‘overcoming obstacles’ and by using lesser known athletes that showed character and attitude they were able to work within lower budgets.
Fostering a diverse innovative ecosystem has led to them opening flagship stores in Shanghai, which follows a similar model to what we see with Apple, offering consumers a unique Under Armour experience. These opportunities foster consumer engagement and sustain the narrative of the brand . They drive innovation through creating new products, such as the infrared technology that drives heat around the body and developing new fabric technologies which are constantly evolving.
Under Armour have managed to systematically scale the brand whilst being true to their core values; they have added lines continuously , branched out with umbrella companies and branded each innovation, yet they remain close to their founding principles, which promotes and fosters this cultural ethos they have built up of determination against all odds. Branching out into women’s clothes lines using women athletes and female designers has been successfully managed. An example was the brand promoting products using the ballet dancer Misty Copeland, an athlete that was once told she did not have a ballet dancer’s body. They have strategically pushed the boundaries sensitively, and with very clever marketing campaigns have successfully scaled a brand which now competes with Nike head to head.
Under Armour, like Nike, have also faced controversy. Following the Sochi Winter Olympics, when the brand was blamed for the poor performance of the athletes due to the ‘skins’ suits the athletes were wearing, Under Armour committed to improving the line, adapting and bringing out new versions. When it was found that it wasn’t the fault of the clothing, the brand still sponsored the team and showed publicly their openness and willingness to challenge the innovations, whilst defending the technologies in the garments. This approach upheld the brand’s core values, and showed that as a sport enterprise they can overcome challenges and find solutions to problems. This openness offers transparency, it shows consumers the risks the brand takes—they are pushing the boundaries—fosters innovation in everything they do. They have been incredibly bold to compete in the sports apparel market, and by staying true to their founding shared values they continue to foster a collaborative and innovative ecosystem.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skinner, J., Smith, A.C.T., Swanson, S. (2018). Introduction: A Different Animal. In: Fostering Innovative Cultures in Sport. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78622-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78622-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78621-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78622-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)