Abstract
Drawing on Dirk Nabers’s 2015 book on crisis and change, this edited volume is built on the key assumption that any social inquiry into global politics should transcend the canonical emphasis on intergovernmental relations with the privileged agency conferred to the role of states. Following a not so recent trend in social theory, we conceptualize the social realm as a discursive space of infinite, endless articulations in which power attempts to transform social relations in an open process to constitute society. We turn our lenses to Ukraine (which has been elsewhere described as a classic crisis) in order to engage with some of the assumptions prescribed above: What is the relationship between crisis and change? Is there an ontology of crisis? How are crises culturally and socially constructed? How do issues of agency and structure come into play in Ukraine? Which subjectivities were brought into existence by the Ukraine crisis discourse? How does identity come to play with the making of this crisis? This introductory chapter explains the rationale behind the book and summarizes the arguments behind the chapters that make this edited volume.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Stuart Croft (2006) developed a model of crisis as a social phenomenon. He understands crises as “engines” for discursive change that have to connect with traditional narratives to become hegemonic and perceived as legitimate. Looking into the 2008 subprime crisis in the USA, Brassett and Clarke (2012) demonstrated how traumatic imagery transmitted by the media, academia, and policy-makers has produced particular subjectivities.
References
Allison, G., and P. Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
Åslund, A. 2015. Ukraine: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Berenskoetter, F. 2014. “Parameters of a National Biography.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (1): 262–88.
Boin, A. 2004. “Lessons from Crisis Research.” International Studies Quarterly 6 (1): 165–74.
Brassett, J., and C. Clarke. 2012. “Performing the Sub-prime Crisis: Trauma and the Financial Event.” International Political Sociology 6 (1): 4–20.
Brecher, M. 1984. “International Crises and Protracted Conflicts.” International Interactions 11 (3–4): 237–97.
Brecher, M., and J. Wilkenfeld. 1982. “Crises in World Politics.” World Politics 24 (1): 380–417.
Brown, N. 2004. Global Instability and Strategic Crisis. London and New York: Routledge.
Carr, E. H. 2001 [1939]. The Twenty Years’ Crisis: 1919–1939. New York: Perennial.
Croft, S. 2006. Culture, Crisis, and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dayton, B. W., ed. 2004. “Managing Crises in the Twenty-First Century.” International Studies Review 6 (1): 165–94.
Deleuze, G. 1990. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. 2004 [1990]. Logic of Sense. London: Continuum.
Edkins, J. 2003. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, J. 1994. Cultural Identity and Global Process. London: Sage.
Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, C. 1996. “From Crisis to Catastrophe? The Ecological Pathologies of the Liberal-Democratic State Form.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences 9 (4): 421–34.
Hay, C. 2013. “Treating the Symptom Not the Condition: Crisis Definition, Deficit Reduction and the Search for a New British Growth Model.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (1): 23–37.
He, Kai. 2013. “Hazard Rate Determinants of Efficient and Successful Crisis Management: An Event History Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1918–2007.” Cooperation and Conflict 48 (1): 51–79.
Hebron, L., and P. James. 1997. “Great Powers, Cycles of Relative Capability and Crises in World Politics.” International Interactions 23 (2): 145–73.
Hermann, C. F. 1969. “International Crisis as a Situational Variable.” In International Politics and Foreign Policy, edited by J. N. Rosenau. New York: Free Press.
Hermann, C. F., and L. P. Brady. 1972. “Alternative Models of International Crisis Behavior.” In International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research, edited by C. F. Hermann. New York: Free Press.
Hollis, M., and S. Smith. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kouzmin, A., and A. M. G. Jarman. 2004. “Policy Advice as Crisis: A Political Redefinition of Crisis Management.” International Studies Review 6 (1): 182–89.
Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Lynn Doty, R. 1993. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 297–320.
Mälksoo, M. 2015. “‘Memory Must Be Defended’: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security.” Security Dialogue 46 (3): 221–37.
McCormick, J. M. 1978. “International Crises: A Note on Definition.” The Western Political Quarterly 31 (3): 352–58.
Menon, R., and E. Rumer. 2015. Conflict in Ukraine: The Unwinding of the Post-Cold War Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Morgenthau, H. J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Nabers, D. 2015. A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Plokhy, S. 2000. “The City of Glory: Sevastopol in Russian Historical Mythology.” Journal of Contemporary History 35 (3): 369–83.
Resende, E., and D. Budryte, eds. 2013. Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, Cases, Debates. London: Routledge.
Reynolds, J. 2008. “Wounds and Scars: Deleuze on the Time and Ethics of the Event.” Deleuze Studies 1 (2): 144–66.
Stern, E. K. 1999. Crisis Decisionmaking: A Cognitive Institutional Approach. Stockholm: CRISMART/The Swedish National Defence College.
Stern, E. K. 2003. “Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges.” International Studies Review 5 (1): 183–91.
Weldes, J. 1999. “The Cultural Production of Crises: U.S. Identity and Missiles in Cuba.” In Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger, edited by J. Weldes, M. Laffey, H. Gusterson, and R. Duvall. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Widmaier, W. W. 2007. “Constructing Foreign Policy Crises: Interpretive Leadership in the Cold War and War on Terrorism.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 779–94.
Widmaier, W. W., M. Blyth, and L. Seabrooke. 2007. “Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 747–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Resende, E., Budrytė, D., Buhari-Gulmez, D. (2018). Introduction. In: Resende, E., Budrytė, D., Buhari-Gulmez, D. (eds) Crisis and Change in Post-Cold War Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78589-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78589-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78588-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78589-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)