Skip to main content

Abstract

Assuming that the continuation of pastoralism (Pastoralism includes all livestock breeding activities which extensively graze, the sources of fodder spontaneously supplied by natural areas, in order to provide all or part of animal feed. [Association française de pastoralisme, @: pastoralisme.net]) goes together with the conservation of open environments, one of the objectives of the program LIFE + MIL’OUV (www.lifemilouv.org) combines naturalist and zootechnical skills. For this aim, the specialists in animal husbandry and field ecology involved in this program, worked with breeders to identify ways and means for an optimized management of these environments. The method is succinctly discussed here to illustrate a cross-analysis of the viability of animal husbandry and that of the natural environment. This construction process seems also useful to create and maintain a common culture between domains too often evolving, separately, whereas reciprocal benefits could be obtained. Indeed, better management means both an optimal use of the resources available for herds, and the maintenance by the pastoral practices in these areas of high heritage value. The presentation of four systems of animal husbandry met during the project and their trajectories, highlights these reciprocal benefits: a rangeland can be considered as a reserve of grass for the herds or as an environment with challenging conservation stakes but the viability of one cannot be achieved without the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 1954, he becomes the first holder of the Chair of applied ecology and nature protection of the MNHN (Paris, Brunoy); see Heim (1965) for a biography

  2. 2.

    This article is a very personal account of works of a garrigue committee (consisting of scientists and socio-professionals) which met in 1943 and 1944 under the framework of the 10th Economic Region

  3. 3.

    The adjective ‘leplaysien’ was forged by Kalaora and Savoye (1986); it refers to the sociologist ‘Frédéric Le Play’ who was devoted to forests and who replaced them in their economic and social context to derive the management rules from them. The ‘Leplaysiens’ foresters distinguish themselves from other foresters by being interested in rural mountain societies and taking into account their development issues in the management and reforestation of these areas.

  4. 4.

    Foresters of the Nîmes School object to reforestation (artificial plantations of conifers) and urged their colleagues to be very careful about the natural dynamics (see Mure and Lepart 2006).

  5. 5.

    Olivier Nougarède (1994) made a critical analysis of its use

  6. 6.

    The notion of an ecosystem, which focuses on interactions without assuming equilibrium, was put forward as a theory by Tansley (1935) and the very first applications were carried out on natural systems during the Second World War

  7. 7.

    Lepart et al. 2011

  8. 8.

    Lepart and Fonderflick (in preparation)

  9. 9.

    CIVAM: Centres d’Initiatives pour Valoriser l’Agriculture et le Milieu rural, @: http://www.civam.org/index.php/agriculture-durable/agriculture-projets-locaux/471-le-civam-empreinte-un-groupe-d-echange-pour-valoriser-les-vegetations-spontanees

  10. 10.

    The AMAP promotes a marketing system based on the principle of a direct contract between the consumers and the producers

  11. 11.

    Terres Vivantes supports the creation of agricultural activity and the animation on rural areas. It welcomes and offers support to people wanting to settle in agriculture, often in a progressive manner, sometimes with “atypical” projects. @: http://www.terresvivantes.org/

References

  • Bertrand G (1978) Le paysage entre la Nature et la Société. Revue géographique des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest 48:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flahault C (1891) La question forestière. Bull de la Société de Botanique de France XXXVIII:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Flahault C (1926) Trois conférences forestières. Société française des amis des arbres, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Flahault C (1927) Le boisement des terres incultes et des montagnes. Bull de la Société centrale d’agriculture de l’Aude, 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim R (1965) G. Kuhnholtz-Lordat (1888–1965). Comptes rendus des séances de l’académie d’agriculture (28 Avril 1965), pp 505–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaora B, Savoye A (1986) La forêt pacifiée. Les forestiers de l’Ecole de Le Play, experts des sociétés pastorales. L’Harmattan, Paris. 134 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnholtz-Lordat G (1938) La terre incendiée. Essai d’agronomie comparée. Editions de la Maison Carrée, Nîmes. 362p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnholtz-Lordat G (1945) La silva, le saltus et l’ager de garrigue. Annales de l’Ecole Nationale d’Agriculture de Montpellier 26(4):1–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnholtz-Lordat G (1958) L’écran vert. Mémoires du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, IX, 276 p, XVI planches

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepart J, Marty P, Fonderflick J (2011) Landscape dynamics and biodiversity of agro-pastoral landscapes in ‘Les Causses’. Fourrages:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin CH (2002) Une méthode pour comprendre les pratiques d’alimentation des herbivores domestiques: analyse du fonctionnement des systèmes d’alimentation par enquêtes en élevages. Guide méthodologique. Institut de l’Elevage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mure V, Lepart J (2006) L’Ecole de Nîmes. Les conceptions de la gestion forestière en région méditerranéenne de Roger Ducamp, Conservateur des Eaux et Forêts (1861–1938). Forêt Méditerranéenne XXVII:275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Nougarède O (1994) L’équilibre agrosylvopastoral, premier essai de réconciliation entre l’agriculture et la forêt. Revue forestière française, XLVI, n° spécial, pp 165–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Poux X, Ramain B. 2009. L’agriculture à Haute Valeur Naturelle, mieux la (re)connaître pour mieux l’accompagner, EFNCP, 41p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing. 509p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Lepart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lepart, J., Huron, J., Girardin, S. (2019). Enhancing Coviability Through an Eco-Pastoral Approach, the European Project LIFE + MIL’OUV. In: Barrière, O., et al. Coviability of Social and Ecological Systems: Reconnecting Mankind to the Biosphere in an Era of Global Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78497-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics