Abstract
An evolution equation model is provided for the two-slit experiment of quantum mechanics. The state variable of the equation is the probability density function of particle positions. The equation has a local diffusion term corresponding to stochastic variation of particles, and a nonlocal dispersion term corresponding to oscillation of particles in the transverse direction perpendicular to their forward motion. The model supports the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics and gives descriptive agreement with the Schrödinger equation model of the experiment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allahverdyan AE, Balian R, Nieuwenhuizen TM (2013) Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models. Phys Rep 525(1):1–166
Armstrong NJ, Painter KJ, Sherratt JA (2006) A continuum approach to modelling cell-cell adhesion. J Theoret Biol 243(1):98–113
Arndt M, Nairz O, Vos-Andreae J, Keller C, van der Zouw G, Zeilinger A (1999) Wave-particle duality of \(C_{60}\) molecules. Nature 401:680–682
Ballentine LE (1970) The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev Modern Phys 42(4):358–381
Ballentine LE (1998) Quantum mechanics: a modern development. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ
Barrachina RO, Frémont F, Fossez K, Gruyer D, Helaine V, Lepailleur A, Leredde A, Maclot S, Scamps G, Chesnel J-Y (2010) Linewidth oscillations in a nanometer-size double-slit interference experiment with single electrons. Phys Rev A 81:060702
Bassi A, Ghirardi G (2003) Dynamical reduction models. Phys Rep 379(5–6):257–426
Born M (1926) Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge (Quantum mechanics of collision). Z Phys A 38(11–12):803–827
Cetto AM, de la Peña L, Valdés-Hernández A (2015) Specificity of the Schrödinger equation. Quantum Stud Math Found 2(3):275–287
Cresser JD (2011) Quantum physics notes. Macquarie University. http://physics.mq.edu.au/~jcresser/Phys304/Handouts/QuantumPhysicsNotes.pdf
de la Peña L, Cetto AM, Valdés Hernández A (2015) The emerging quantum: the physics behind quantum mechanics, chapter The phenomenological stochastic approach: A short route to quantum mechanics, pp 33–66. Springer, Cham
Dyson J, Gourley SA, Villella-Bressan R, Webb GF (2010) Existence and asymptotic properties of solutions of a nonlocal evolution equation modeling cell-cell adhesion. SIAM J Math Anal 42(4):1784–1804
Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev 41(10):777–780
Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M (1965) The Feynman lectures on physics vol 3: Quantum mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Ford GW, O’Connell RF (2002) Wave packet spreading: Temperature and squeezing effects with applications to quantum measurement and decoherence. Amer J Phys 70(3):319–324
Friedman A (1969) Partial differential equations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Gisin N, Percival IC (1993) The quantum state diffusion picture of physical processes. J Phys A 26(9):2245–2260
Goldstein JA (1985) Semigroups of linear operators and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hongo H, Miyamoto Y, Furuya K, Suhara M (1997) A 40-nm-pitch double-slit experiment of hot electrons in a semiconductor under a magnetic field. Appl Phys Lett 70(1):93–95
Kato T (1966) Perturbation theory for linear operators. Springer, New York
Kocsis S, Braverman B, Ravets S, Stevens MJ, Mirin RP, Shalm LK, Steinberg AM (2011) Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer. Science 332(6034):1170–1173
Landé A (1965) New foundations of quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Landé A (1973) Quantum mechanics in a new key. Exposition Press, New York
Marcella TV (2002) Quantum interference with slits. Eur J Phys 23(6):615–621
McClendon M, Rabitz H (1988) Numerical simulations in stochastic mechanics. Phys Rev A 37(9):3479–3492
Nairz O, Arndt M, Zeilinger A (2003) Quantum interference experiments with large molecules. Amer J Phys 71(4):319–325
Painter KJ, Bloomfield JM, Sherratt JA, Gerisch A (2015) A nonlocal model for contact attraction and repulsion in heterogeneous cell populations. Bull Math Biol 77(6):1132–1165
Percival I (1998) Quantum state diffusion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Popper KR (1967) Quantum mechanics without “the observer”. In: Bunge M (ed) Quantum Theory and Reality. pp. Springer, Berlin, pp 7–44
Przibram K (ed) (1967) Letters on wave mechanics. Philosophical Library, New York
Schilpp PA (ed) (1970) Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist. Cambridge University Press, London
Sherratt JA, Gourley SA, Armstrong NJ, Painter KJ (2009) Boundedness of solutions of a non-local reaction-diffusion model for adhesion in cell aggregation and cancer invasion. European J Appl Math 20(1):123–144
Skála J, Čižek L, Kapsa V (2011) Quantum mechanics as applied mathematical statistics. Ann Phys 326(5):1174–1188
Styer DF, Balkin MS, Becker KM, Burns MR, Dudley CE, Forth ST, Gaumer JS, Kramer MA, Oertel DC, Park LH, Rinkoski MT, Smith CT, Wotherspoon TD (2002) Nine formulations of quantum mechanics. Amer J Phys 70(3):288–296
Thaller B (2000) Visual quantum mechanics: selected topics with computer-generated animations of quantum-mechanical phenomena. Springer, New York
Tollaksen J, Aharonov Y, Casher A, Kaufherr T, Nussinov S (2010) Quantum interference experiments, modular variables and weak measurements. New J Phys 12:013023
Tonomura A (1998) The quantum world unveiled by electron waves. World Scientific, Singapore
Tonomura A (2005) Direct observation of thitherto unobservable quantum phenomena by using electrons. PNAS 102(42):14952–14959
Tonomura A, Endo J, Matsuda T, Kawasaki T, Ezawa H (1989) Demonstration of single-electron buildup of an interference pattern. Amer J Phys 57(2):117–120
Webb GF (2011) Event based interpretation of Schrödinger’s equation for the two-slit experiment. Int J Theor Phys 50:3571–3601
Yosida K (1968) Functional analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
This work is dedicated to William Fitzgibbon and Yuri Kuznetsov in honor of their most valuable contributions to mathematical research and the community of mathematical researchers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Let \(X = C[-\infty ,\infty ]\), the space of bounded uniformly continuous functions on \((-\infty ,\infty )\) with norm \(\Vert f \Vert = \sup _{-\infty< x < \infty }|f(x)|\). For \(\sigma > 0\) let
Then \(T_{\sigma }(t), t \ge 0\) is a strongly continuous holomorphic semigroup of positive linear operators in X with infinitesimal generator \((A_{\sigma } f)(x) = \sigma d^2 f(x) / d x^2\) satisfying \(| T_{\sigma }(t) | \le 1, t \ge 0\) [41, Chap. IX]. For \(t > 0\), \(A_{\sigma } T_{\sigma }(t)\) is bounded in X, and there exists \(M_{\sigma } > 0\) such that \(| A_{\sigma } T_{\sigma }(t) | \le M_{\sigma } / t, t > 0\) [16, Part 2]. Further, \((T_{\sigma }(t)f)(x)\) is the strong solution in X to the diffusion equation
For \(\beta > 0\) define the bounded linear operator B in X by
Define
for \(f \in X\), \(t \ge 0\), \(-\infty< x < \infty \). Then \(\exp (t B)\), \(t \ge 0\), is a group of positive linear operators in X with infinitesimal generator B satisfying \(|\exp (t B) | \le 1\), \(t \ge 0\) (see [41, p. 244]).
Theorem 1
Let \(\beta > 0\), \(s = 1\), \(f \in X \cap L_+^1(-\infty ,\infty )\), and let \( \int _{-\infty }^{\infty } f(x) dx = 1\). Then for \(t \ge 0\),
If also, \(x^2 f(x) \in L^1(-\infty ,\infty )\), then the mean of \(\exp (t B)f = \) the mean of f and the variance of \(\exp (t B)f = \) the variance of \(f + 2 t \beta \).
Proof
From (15), we obtain (16), since for \(t \ge 0\)
Let \(\mu _f\) be the mean of f and \(\mu _{\exp (tB) f}\) the mean of \(\exp (tB) f\). Then
Let \(\nu _f\) be the variance of f and \(\nu _{\exp (tB) f}\) the variance of \(\exp (tB) f\). A calculation similar to (17) yields
since
\(\square \)
Theorem 2
Let \(\alpha > 0\), \(\beta > 0\), and \(s = 1\). For \(\omega _0 \in X \cap L_+^1(-\infty ,\infty )\) such that \(\int _{-\infty }^{\infty } \omega _0(x) dx = 1\), the unique solution \(\omega (x,z) = \omega (x,t)\) of (9) is
(where we have identified \(z = t\) in (9)). Further, there exists a constant C such that
Remark 1
If \(\omega _0\) also has compact support, then (19) implies that uniformly on bounded sets of \(x \in (-\infty ,\infty )\)
Proof
Since \(A_{\sigma }\) and B commute, \(T_{\sigma }(t)\) and \(\exp (t B)\) commute for \(t \ge 0\), and \(T_{\sigma }(t) \exp (t B), t \ge 0\) is the semigroup of operators for the solutions of (9). Since \(T_{\alpha }(t), t \ge 0\) is a holomorphic semigroup in X, \(T_{\alpha }(t) \exp (t B) \omega _0\) is the unique strong solution of (9) in X for \(t > 0\), \(\omega _0 \in X\). If \(f \in X\) is analytic, then
and
For \(g \in X\), \(t > 0\), \(T_{\alpha }(t) g\) is analytic, and so
Then,
From [20, Chap. 9] the solution of this nonhomogeneous equation satisfies
Thus, (19) follows, since for \(t \ge M_{\alpha }\),
and by L’Hospital’s Rule
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webb, G.F. (2019). Ensemble Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Two-Slit Experiment. In: Chetverushkin, B., Fitzgibbon, W., Kuznetsov, Y., Neittaanmäki, P., Periaux, J., Pironneau, O. (eds) Contributions to Partial Differential Equations and Applications. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78325-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78325-3_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78324-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78325-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)