Skip to main content

Frankenstein and the Peculiar Power of the Comics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Global Frankenstein

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Science Fiction ((SGSF))

Abstract

Comics have an affinity for monsters and a particular affinity for generating monsters that arouse a reader’s empathy. This chapter explores the representational strategies of prose and cinema around Frankenstein’s monster before turning to illustration and comics. Prose excels at presenting subjective experience, while cinema is more attuned to the imprint of the external world. Illustration accompanies printed text with the occasional image, but comics, with more persistent images, uniquely and easily allows the reader continual and intermingled access to both the objective monstrousness of the creature and its less monstrous consciousness. External and internal are kept before the reader’s eyes, giving these representations a complex poignance. Close readings of comics from the 1950s, 1970s and 2000s demonstrate the strategies deployed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to my editor Carol Margaret Davison for linking the bodies of these monsters to those of their readers. By the way, these monster-heroes were directly descended from the more monster-y monsters Marvel was featuring in the late 1950s and early 1960s. By turning its monsters into aliens, Marvel was able to elude the Comics Code Authority; Fin Fang Foom, for example, was an extraterrestrial dragon modestly sporting purple shorts.

  2. 2.

    She adds, ‘Once the monster becomes visible within contemporary horror films, monstrosity becomes less and less recuperable’ (Halberstam 1995: 39).

  3. 3.

    That edition featured but two facing images, on the frontispiece and title page (engraved by W. Chevalier from illustrations by Theodor Von Holst). These are effectively discussed in Ian Haywood, ‘Image of the Month: Theodore Von Holst, ‘Frankenstein’ (1831),’ https://romanticillustrationnetwork.wordpress.com/2016/11/26/image-of-the-month-theodore-von-holst-frankenstein-1831/

  4. 4.

    In conversation, 2017.

  5. 5.

    Incredibly, this unique characteristic of the medium has fallen from fashion over the past few decades in favour of running captions that mimic the more cinematic device of the voice-over.

  6. 6.

    Ploog apprenticed under Will Eisner, whose work similarly revelled in expressive close-ups while remaining appealingly cartoony.

  7. 7.

    This device was also used to introduce the ‘monstrous’ Buddy Love in Jerry Lewis’ The Nutty Professor (1963) a few years later.

  8. 8.

    There is so much more to say about Mignola’s work. See my Hellboy’s World: Comics and Monsters on the Margins (University of California Press, 2016).

  9. 9.

    In her editorial notes to this essay, Carol Margaret Davison comments that Mignola ‘opens up an entirely new avenue with Frankenstein in this instance, one that resonates with the narratives of Dracula and other doomed Gothic immortals.’ I fully agree, and wish I had the space to pursue that crucial development.

Works Cited

  • Bender, John B., and Michael Marrinan. 2010. The Culture of Diagram. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Mel (director, co-writer). 1974. Young Frankenstein. 20th Century Fox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukatman, Scott. 2016. Hellboy’s World: Comics and Monsters on the Margins. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denson, Shane. 2011. Marvel Comics’ Frankenstein: A Case Study in the Media of Serial Figures. Amerikastudien/American Studies 55 (4): 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Postnaturalism: Frankenstein, Film, and the Anthropotechnical Interface. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Al, and Jack Davis. 1953. Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall. Tales from the Crypt, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Gary, Mike Ploog, et al. 2015. The Monster of Frankenstein. New York: Marvel Comics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabilliet, Jean-Paul. 2010. Of Comics and Men: A Cultural History of American Comic Books. Trans. Bart Beaty and Nick Nguyen. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, Tom. 1999. Narrative Discourse and the Narrator System. In Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, ed. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen, 470–481. New York/London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, Judith. 1995. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, Ian. 2016. Image of the Month: Theodore von Holst, ‘Frankenstein’ (1831). https://romanticillustrationnetwork.wordpress.com/2016/11/26/image-of-the-month-theodore-von-holst-frankenstein-1831/

  • Mendelsund, Peter. 2014. What We See When We Read: A Phenomenology With Illustrations. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Christian. 1974. On the Impression of Reality in the Cinema. In Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mignola, Mike, and Ben Stenbeck. 2015. Frankenstein Underground. Portland: Dark Horse Comics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Grant, and Chris Weston. 2004. The Filth, Issue 10. Vertigo Comics: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, Dan. 2006. Art Out of Time: Unknown Comics Visionaries 1900–1969. New York: Harry N. Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestrick, William. 1979. Coming to Life: Frankenstein and the Nature of Film Narrative. In The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s Novel, ed. George Levine and U.C. Knoepflmacher. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake, Richard Brinsley. 1823. Presumption: Or, the Fate of Frankenstein. http://www.rc.umd.edu/editions/peake/index.html

  • Raub, Emma. 2012. Frankenstein and the Mute Figure of Melodrama. Modern Drama 55 (4): 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, Marc. 2003. Frankenstein’s Cinematic Dream. Romantic Circles. https://www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/frankenstein/redfield/redfield.html

  • Scott, Grant F. 2012. Victor’s Secret: Queer Gothic in Lynd Ward’s Illustrations to Frankenstein (1934). Word & Image 28 (2): 206–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. 2016. Frankenstein: The Lynd Ward Illustrated Edition. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary, and Barry Moser. (1983). Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus, The Pennyroyal edition. West Hatfield: Pennyroyal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Allen S. 2004. Ten Theses on Monsters and Monstrosity. TDR: The Drama Review 48 (1): 124–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whale, James (director). 1931. Frankenstein. Universal Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bukatman, S. (2018). Frankenstein and the Peculiar Power of the Comics. In: Davison, C., Mulvey-Roberts, M. (eds) Global Frankenstein. Studies in Global Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78142-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics