Skip to main content

Narratives of Kamayee/Dhanda (Income): Modes of Wages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Precarious Labour and Informal Economy
  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

Yadav describes the various work/employment options available and how the work comes to them and what is the meaning of work for the Gonds. She discusses ethnographies of work of the Gonds and how they construct around their livelihood strategies around these work options. She questions the nature of this relationship. For this, she analyses the different types of household portfolios mapping their motives and aspirations and their economic circumstances. She shows how the Gond households navigate and negotiate with their household members for division of labour and to achieve autonomous lives and how that varies from household to household.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I discuss this more in Chapter 6 on the state about how schooling is valued amongst the marginalised population drawing upon Froerer (2011) ethnography amongst the Hindu Oraons in Chhattisgarh.

  2. 2.

    Uxorilocal Households in Mahalapur In the village of Mahalapur, there are many (gharjamayees) move to their wives’ natal village and raise families there. Such living arrangement is a common strategy for food security: although they are landless in Mahalapur, they might have some landholding in their original village. For food security, they contribute towards the agricultural cost and sometimes can also care for their wives’ parents to reciprocate for the hospitality extended to build a house nearby the wives’ parent’s house.

  3. 3.

    The normative shift in the social role of women in India due to their economic contribution is only restricted to highly industrialised and urbanised areas like Mumbai where economic differentiation of work has helped women’s social roles to shift along class lines but not along gender or caste lines.

  4. 4.

    Sanskritisation in urban households is also associated with Westernisation where households move from joint to a more nuclear family and women’s work participation is allowed only in the formal economy and on farms sector. The practice of paying groom-price and veiling of the Gonds and other marginalised groups like tribal (ST) and Dalit (SC) women in India is a form of Sanskritisation.

References

  • Abrar, C. R., & Seeley, J. (Eds.). (2009). Social Protection and Livelihoods: Marginalised Migrant Workers of India and Bangladesh. University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (1999). Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Modified Version of a Paper Presented at the 1999 Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam Khan, I., & Seeley, J. (2005). Making a Living: The Livelihoods of the Rural Poor in Bangladesh. The University Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A. (2005). Livelihood and Food Security in Rural Bangladesh: The Role of Social Capital. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands, p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman, J. (1996). Footloose Labour: Working in India’s Informal Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breman, J., & Mundle, S. (Eds.). (1991). Rural Transformation in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carswell, G. (2002). Farmers and Fallowing: Agricultural Change in Kigezi District, Uganda. The Geographical Journal, 168(2), 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1989). Vulnerability, Coping and Policy. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. IDS Bulletin, 37(4), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century (IDS Discussion Paper 296). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (2005). The Inequality of Social Capital and the Reproduction of Chronic Poverty. World Development, 33(6), 893–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbridge, S., & Shah, A. (2013). Introduction: The Underbelly of the Indian Boom. Economy and Society, 42(3), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, R. J. (2004). Social Capital and Poverty of the Wage‐Labour Class: Problems with the Social Capital Theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, L., & Zoomers, A. (2005). Exploring the Frontier of Livelihoods Research. Development Change, 36(1), 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshingkar, P. (2006). Internal Migration, Poverty and Development in Asia: Including the Excluded. IDS Bulletin, 37(3), 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1998). Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froerer, P. (2011). Education, Inequality And Social Mobility In Central India. European Journal of Development Research, 23(5), 695–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, K. (2009). Lives in Motion: The Life-Course, Movement and Migration in Bangladesh. Journal of South Asian Development, 4(2), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garikipati, S., & Pfaffenzeller, S. (2012). The Gendered Burden of Liberalisation: The Impact of India’s Economic Reforms on Its Female Agricultural Labour. Journal of International Development, 24(7), 841–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K., & Swift, J. (2001). Household Food Security. In S. Devereux & S. Maxwell (Eds.), Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 67–92). London: ITDG Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White, B. & Garikipati, S. (2008). India’s Semi-Arid Rural Economy: Livelihoods, Seasonal Migration And Gender. European Journal of Development Research, 20(4), 547–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, K., & Nelson, J. (1998). Sustainable Livelihoods and Livelihood Diversification (IDS Working Paper No. 69). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kis-Katos, K. (2012). Gender Differences in Work-Schooling Decisions in Rural North India. Review of Economics of the Household, 10(4), 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P., & Shariff. A. (2004). Rural Non-farm Employment in India: Access, Incomes and Poverty Impact (Working Paper No. 81). New Delhi: National Centre for Applied Economic Work (NCAER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerche, J., Shah, A., & Harriss‐White, B. (2013). Introduction: Agrarian Questions and Left Politics in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhya Pradesh. (2002). Human Development Report. http://www.mp.gov.in/difmp/MPHDR2002.htm.

  • Meher, R. (2009). Globalization, Displacement and the Livelihood Issues of Tribal and Agriculture Dependent Poor People the Case of Mineral-Based Industries in India. Journal of Developing Societies, 25(4), 457–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. O. N. (1998). The Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies. World Development, 26(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D., Gupta, S., Mehta, M., Shah, V., Rees, J. F., & Team, K. P. (2002). Brokered Livelihoods: Debt, Labour Migration and Development in Tribal Western India. Journal of Development Studies, 38(5), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, D. F., Sen, K., & Kling, V. (2012). The Puzzling Decline in Rural Women’s Labor Force Participation in India: A Reexamination. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (Working Paper No. 196). Hamburg, Germany: GIGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehof, A. (2004). The Significance of Diversification for Rural Livelihood Systems. Food Policy, 29(4), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehof, A., & Price, L. (2001). Rural Livelihood Systems: A Conceptual Framework. Wageningen-Upward Series and on Rural Livelihoods No. 1. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wu-Upward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, W. K., & Ramanamurthy, R. V. (2000). Contract Labour and Bondage in Andhra Pradesh (India). Journal of Social and Political Thought, 1(2). http://Www.Yorku.Ca/Jspot/2/Wkolsenrvramana.Htm.

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). The Determinants of Gender Equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s Thesis with New Data. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 239–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogaly, B., Biswas, J., Coppard, D., Rafique, A., Rana, K., & Sengupta, A. (2001). Seasonal Migration, Social Change and Migrants’ Rights: Lessons from West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 4547–4559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmink, M. (1984). Household Economic Strategies: Review and Research Agenda. Latin American Research Review, 19(3), 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis (Working Paper No. 72). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, J. (2007). Livelihoods at the Margins: Surviving the City. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Start, D. & Johnson, C. (2004). Livelihood Options? The Political Economy of Access, Opportunity and Diversification (Working Paper No. 33). Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. (1998). Factors Influencing the Dynamics of Livelihood Diversification and Rural Non-Farm Employment in Space and Time. Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, S. (2008). Sustaining Livelihoods in Multi-local Settings: Possible Theoretical Linkages Between Transnational Migration and Livelihood Studies. Mobilities, 3(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Sanso, P. (2012). Gender, Poverty and Old Age, in Urban South India in an Era of Globalisation. Oxford Development Studies, 40(3), 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. (2002). Tracking Livelihood Change: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Perspectives from North-East Ghana. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28(3), 575–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2003). Staying Secure, Staying Poor: The ‘Faustian Bargain’. World Development, 31(3), 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. D. (2005). Poverty, Capabilities and Perverse Social Capital: The Antidote to Sen and Putnam. In J. Seeley & A. Khan (Eds.), Making a Living: The Livelihoods of the Rural Poor in Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2003). World Development Report 2002. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yadav, S. (2018). Narratives of Kamayee/Dhanda (Income): Modes of Wages. In: Precarious Labour and Informal Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77971-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77971-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77970-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77971-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics