Abstract
The city is one of the greatest products of human civilization that has been built to provide services; safety and comfort. However, uncontrolled urban growth caused some anonymous, and unsightly images of the cities among which are underused, abandoned, or deserted urban space. Public space in cities reflects social life, and hosts community interaction; the absence of social interaction changes the public space to wasted and lost spaces. Wasted urban space leads to the discontinuity of the urban fabric creating meaningless unstructured landscapes within the city’s urban fabric. Wasted space is the unrecognized areas of land that are in need of redesign; their value is derived from their potential in vitalizing and connecting their surrounding urban context.
The research significance lies in recognizing the importance of community urban open spaces, their value and impact. The research also addresses the reuse and the regeneration of lost urban spaces in order to enhance the physical and social quality of life in urban open space. In addition, the reuse of in-between left over space is an incremental process that is addressed in building totally new cities which follow phasing development plans; as well as vitalizing the land of already existing cities.
Connecting or stitching the discontinuous urban fabric, represents an exploratory process in the relationship between infrastructure and the urban fabric and seeks to establish an architectural solution to leftover spaces within the city. In doing so, the research establishes a framework (criteria) for reuse of lost urban space by implementing an inductive and deductive analytical methodology applied to relevant examples and case studies of lost urban space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archdaily. (2016). Archdaily. Retrieved from Archdaily: www.archdaily.com
ASLA. (2007). Retrieved from www.asla.org
Dara Rourke, G. N. (2002). MIT east campus life cycle assessment project. Retrieved from archi node web site.
Google Earth. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.googleearth.com
Im-Sik Cho, C. K. (2016). Re-framing urban space: Urban design for emerging hybrid and high-density conditions. New York: Routledge.
Lawrence Perkins, P. W. (2016). Perkins+will. Retrieved from perkins+will website: http://www.perkinswill.com
Matthew Carmona, F. M. (2011). Capital spaces: The multiple complex public spaces of a global city. London/NewYork: Routledge.
Michael Larice, E. M. (2013). The urban design reader. NewYork: Routledge.
Nefs, M. (2006). Unused urban space:Conservation or transformation? Polemics about the future of urban wastelands and abandoned buildings. City & Time, 2(1), 47–58.
PPS. (2016). Project for public spaces. Retrieved from www.pps.org, http://www.pps.org/?s=urban+squares
Rob Krier. (1979). Urban Space. Academy Group Ltd. London
The High Line. (2016). Retrieved from www.thehighline.org
Tiesdell, M. C. (2007). Urban design reader. Oxford: El Sevier.
Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. New York: Van.
Vladimir, D. (2007). Retrieved from www.vladimirdjurovic.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sameeh, R., Gabr, M., Aly, S. (2019). Reusing Lost Urban Space. In: Attia, S., Shafik, Z., Ibrahim, A. (eds) New Cities and Community Extensions in Egypt and the Middle East. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77875-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77875-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77874-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77875-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)