Skip to main content

User-Generated Content: Perceived Affordances in Students’ Usage of the Web for Tertiary Learning Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'18 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 746))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates which affordances students perceive when using the Internet for academic learning purposes, with a focus on user-generated content (UGC). Based on an explorative interview study, Wikipedia, Facebook, and YouTube were found to play an important role in students’ preparation and working settings. The findings indicate that the usage of Wikipedia and YouTube is mainly based on perceived content-related and physical affordances. In the case of Facebook, also social/relational and transactional affordances play a major role by enabling users to participate in peer groups and to share materials of interest. The results are to be validated in further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Benkler, Y.: Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm. Yale Law J. 112, 369–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pascu, C., Osimo, D., Ulbrich, M., Turlea, G., Burgelman, J.C.: The potential disruptive impact of Internet2 based technologies. First Monday 12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wunsch-Vincent, S., Vickery, G.: Participative Web: User-Generated Content. Working Party on the Information Economy (WPIE). OECD, Paris (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krumm, J., Davies, N., Narayanaswami, C.: User-generated content. Guest editors’ introduction. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7, 10–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer, C.A.: User Generated Content: Urheberrechtliche Zulässigkeit nutzergenerierter Medieninhalte. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Daugherty, T., Eastin, M.S., Bright, L.: Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. J. Interact. Advert. 8, 16–25 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor Books, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schroer, J., Hertel, G.: Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychol. 12, 96–120 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802669466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giles, J.: Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900–901 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. König, R.: Wikipedia: between lay participation and elite knowledge representation. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16, 160–177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.734319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stegbauer, C.: Wikipedia: Das Rätsel der Kooperation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Giles, J.: The Wiki-opoly threatening the world’s best encylopedia. New Sci. 218(2912), 38–41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorman, G.E.: Who Pays the ferryman? Will Wikipedia as a “democratic process survive, or cross the Styx?”. Online Inf. Rev. 37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/oir.2013.26437daa.001

  14. Ehmann, K., Large, A., Beheshti, J.: Collaboration in context: comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Wikipedia. First Monday 13 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., Ram, S.: Who does what: collaboration patterns in the Wikipedia and their impact on article quality. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 11:1–11:23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoo, S.J., Huang, W.D.: Comparison of Web 2.0 technology acceptance level based on cultural differences. J. Educ Technol. Soc. 14, 241–252 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zakaria, M.H., Watson, J., Edwards, S.L.: Investigating the use of Web 2.0 technology. Multicult. Educ. Technol. J. 4, 17–29 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G.: Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput. Educ. 56, 429–440 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagler, W., Ebner, M.: Is your university ready for the ne(x)t-generation? In: Siemens, G., Fulford, C. (eds.) Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009–World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 4344–4351. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Honolulu (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., Healing, G.: Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Comput. Educ. 54, 722–732 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lai, C.: Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Comput. Educ. 82, 74–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K., Krause, K.: First year students’ experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 24, 108–122 (2008). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Howard, S.K., Ma, J., Yang, J.: Student rules: exploring patterns of students’ computer-efficacy and engagement with digital technologies in learning. Comput. Educ. 101, 29–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, pp. 127–143. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things. First Doubleday (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harindranath, G., Bernroider, E., Kamel, S.: Social media and social transformation movements: the role of affordances and platforms. In: ECIS 2015 Completed Research Papers, Paper 73. Münster, Germany (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mesgari, M., Faraj, S.: Technology affordances: the case of Wikipedia. In: AMCIS 2012 Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Olapiriyakul, K., Widmeyer, G.: Affordances of virtual world commerce: instrument development and validation. In: AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, Paper 304 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. O’Riordan, S., Feller, J., Nagle, T.: Exploring the affordances of social network sites: an analysis of three networks. In: ECIS 2012 Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sarker, S., Lau, F., Sahay, S.: Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. DATA BASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 32, 38–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1145/506740.506745

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported with a netidee scholarship by the Internet Foundation Austria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Raith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Raith, C. (2018). User-Generated Content: Perceived Affordances in Students’ Usage of the Web for Tertiary Learning Activities. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 746. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_137

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_137

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77711-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77712-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics